<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Wager on the Turing Test: The Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computing Machinery and Intelligence &#8211; Alan Turing &#171; tylerayoung</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Computing Machinery and Intelligence &#8211; Alan Turing &#171; tylerayoung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>[...] AI people in the past. The test continues to be relevant to many; Ray Kurzweil has placed a wager that a machine will be able to pass the test by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AI people in the past. The test continues to be relevant to many; Ray Kurzweil has placed a wager that a machine will be able to pass the test by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurzweil: Why IBM&#8217;s Jeopardy Victory Matters (PC Magazine) &#124; Websbay</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules/comment-page-1#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurzweil: Why IBM&#8217;s Jeopardy Victory Matters (PC Magazine) &#124; Websbay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-wager-on-the-turing-test-the-rules#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>[...] Incidentally, properly designing a Turing test is not straightforward and Turing himself left the rules purposely vague. How qualified does the human judge need to be? How human does the judge need to be (for example, can he or she be enhanced with nonbiological intelligence)? How do we ensure that the human foils actually try to trick the judge? How long should the sessions be? Mitch Kapor and I bet $20,000 ($10,000 each), with the proceeds to go to the charity of the winner&#8217;s choice, whether a computer would pass a Turing test by 2029. I said yes and he said no. We spent considerable time negotiating the rules. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Incidentally, properly designing a Turing test is not straightforward and Turing himself left the rules purposely vague. How qualified does the human judge need to be? How human does the judge need to be (for example, can he or she be enhanced with nonbiological intelligence)? How do we ensure that the human foils actually try to trick the judge? How long should the sessions be? Mitch Kapor and I bet $20,000 ($10,000 each), with the proceeds to go to the charity of the winner&#8217;s choice, whether a computer would pass a Turing test by 2029. I said yes and he said no. We spent considerable time negotiating the rules. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
