Automated drug design using synthetic DNA self-assembly
December 6, 2012

Pharmaceutical molecules after self-assembly. The detail shows a single molecule, made up of strands of DNA (credit: Parabon NanoLabs)
Using a simple “drag-and-drop” computer interface and DNA self-assembly techniques, Parabon NanoLabs researchers have developed a new automated method of drug development that could reduce the time required to create and test medications, with the support of an NSF Technology Enhancement for Commercial Partnerships grant.
“We can now ‘print,’ molecule by molecule, exactly the compound that we want,” says Steven Armentrout, the principal investigator on the NSF grants and co-developer of Parabon’s technology.
“What differentiates our nanotechnology from others is our ability to rapidly, and precisely, specify the placement of every atom in a compound that we design.”
The Parabon Essemblix Drug Development Platform combines computer-aided design (CAD) software with nanoscale fabrication technology, developed in partnership with Janssen Research & Development, LLC, part of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson.
To develop new drugs, scientists can use the CAD software to design molecular pieces with specific, functional components. The software then optimizes the design using a cloud supercomputing platform that uses proprietary algorithms to search for specific sets of DNA sequences that can self-assemble those components.

Parabon Essemblix process (credit: Parabon NanoLabs)
“When designing a therapeutic compound, we combine knowledge of the cell receptors we are targeting or biological pathways we are trying to affect with an understanding of the linking chemistry that defines what is possible to assemble,” says Hong Zhong, senior research scientist at Parabon and a collaborator on the grants. “It’s a deliberate and methodical engineering process, which is quite different from most other drug development approaches in use today.”
With the resulting sequences, the scientists chemically synthesize trillions of identical copies of the designed molecules. The process, from conception to production, can be performed in weeks, or even days — much faster than traditional drug discovery techniques that rely on trial and error for screening potentially useful compounds, the company says.
In vivo experiments, funded by the NSF SBIR award, validated the approach, and Parabon filed a provisional patent for its methods and compounds on May 4, 2011. The final application was published in 2012.
Faster, more targeted rational drug design
The process is characteristic of rational drug design, an effort to craft pharmaceuticals based on knowledge of how certain molecular pieces will work together in a biological system. For example, some molecules are good at finding cancer cells, while others are good at latching on to cancer cells, while still others are capable of killing cells. Working together as part of a larger molecule, these pieces could prove effective as a cancer treatment.
While there are other methods to create multi-component compounds, they generally take more time, and the majority of them lack the precise control over size, charge and the relative placement of components enabled by the new technology, the company says.
The Parabon and Janssen researchers intend for their new prostate cancer drug to overcome several existing cancer-treatment obstacles. The drug design combines a toxin with a chemical that makes cancer cells susceptible to that toxin. The drug also incorporates components that improve delivery to cancer cells while avoiding healthy tissue, and chemical markers that allow researchers to monitor the drug’s arrival at tumors. For the new compound, total design time plus synthesis time will be a matter of weeks.
“Currently, most drugs are developed using a screening technique where you try a lot of candidate compounds against targets to ‘see what sticks’,” says Armentrout. “Instead, we’re designing very specific drugs based on their molecular structure, with target molecules that bind to receptors on specific types of cancer cells. In plug-and-play fashion, we can swap in or swap out any of the functional components, as needed, for a range of treatment approaches.”
Concurrently, Parabon is developing other applications for the technology, including synthetic vaccines for biodefense and gene therapies that can target disease, based on information from an individual’s genome. The technology also has applications outside of medicine, and Parabon’s co-founders Chris Dwyer and Michael Norton are building upon the initial NSF-supported work to develop processes to create nanoscale logic gates, devices critical for computing, and molecular nanosensors.
Comments (14)
by Arthur Paliden
So who will be the first to use this tech to build a living cell.
by Dr. X
This approach was already tested by team from University of Washington, one that developed Rosetta software(mostly known for Rosetta@home BOINC project). And that was few successful tests, they got binding sites exactly as they wanted them to be on molecular level, designing DNA from scratch.
But really nice to see commercial companies picking up this technology.
by Alex_shulgin
hopefully this will be used to further psychedelic studies with pure Lysergic Acid and will lead to harm reduction and increased safety with psychedelic compounds.
by Amit
More egg-on-the-face for Smalley’s “sticky fingers”.
by Bri
The future of medicine and the future of home 3D printing in one article( the pharmaceutical companies dont want you to think of it that way.).
by Mr.X
Conspiracy theories.
by melajara
It’s sad but my first thought was: hopefully this company will reach out to the public before being swallowed and disposed of by a big pharma name.
I’m feeling more and more uneasy facing the daily revolutionary news pouring out here and the lame statu quo on medications and procedures dispensed on your typical (and aging) hospital most probably facing cut after cut in staffing and budget with the ensuring drop in quality of life support for the patients.
by Gorden Russell
Oh, don’t be sad, melajara…look on the bright side. Yes, Johnson and Johnson will jump on this new advance just to wring every last drop of profit out of hospitals and patients. Johnson & Johnson will price it up to the maximum that they can squeeze out of insurance companies and Medicare and Medicaid.
But at least the medicine will be out there. They are not going to drag their feet on this, not when there is money to be made. They are going to get this into clinical trials as fast as the law allows, and that is good. The environment is full of carcinogens pumped out by big energy and big chemistry. Do you notice that whenever an old-time artist dies (today I’m thinking of Dave Brubeck who died in his 80s yesterday of cancer) they don’t die just because they got old. It’s often cancer that gets them.
Someday you might need one of these new molecules from Parabon, God forbid that you should, but it’s always a possibility for any one of us. We just have to be happy that these new treatments are in the pipeline.
Remember the graphs in Ray’s book, “The Singularity is Near.” All the lines of projected progress go off-chart up to the right by the year 2046. We have to live until then to see the Sing. It’s going to be a rough, up-hill slog, but you just might be the one to do it, melajara.
by Ian Clarke
Gorden, we don’t have to live that long to ensure that we’re around for the Singularity. According to Ray, we only have to make it through the next 15 years; that’s when we’ll reach the tipping point (when life expectancy increases by a year every year). So hopefully we can all be around for it. :-)
by Gorden Russell
Yes, Ian Clarke, thanks for reminding me. I saw that in his movie, but it slipped my mind for the moment.
by Mr.X
To make my remark clear: It is highly improbable that all parts of this bigger, abstract group (ph companies) are of one whole mind.
Bri’s remark presupposes that each of these companies thinks this stuff is viable and also detrimental to their own interests.
I wonder if they think about it at all.Some companies will, most will miss or dismiss this possible inflection point, if history can be relied upon to make such predictions at this very moment.
Like always, many companies will be swept away by the changes which usually accompany technological breakthroughs.
A big company may swallow the company mentioned here -with mischievious intent- but progress won’t be halted for long.Other groups, maybe in other countries, will spread these technologies instead.In the end, you guys will get them too.
But thinking that all parts of an industry act like one (which is -probably even in the wondrous land where there are companies who are people- illegal) is a strong mark of conspiracy theories.Other signs are excessive use of personal pronouns, mostly plural ones (like they), abstraction instead of concreteness and trying to encompass almost everything.
Having reach these heights of abstraction, THEY would explain everything by saying exactly nothing.
Btw: Taken to its logical conclusion, Ray’s “vision” come true would make all these things irrelevant in the long run.In this sense, ph companies would have no future anyway.It would not be a matter of if, but when they go down.
Of course, in the meantime people may die who could have been saved.Philosophical arguments about whether the singularity -even in its most positive outcome- would kill you (and others) set aside, there is one thinker in this field who allegedly hopes to bring back is deceased father.So, maybe we can bring back people later, and only patience is required, and people aren’t really lost.
Even if ph companies delay progress in some fields for some time, this would therefore only be a drop in the vast ocean of time before us (all), signifying nothing.
Of course, such a vision warrants the comparison with religion.
by Gorden Russell
Right, Bri, and don’t forget that last line of the story. This will help lead up to the DNA computers that we can inject into the hippocampus to give us an interface into the Cloud. Just think of what you will be able to do when you have your head in the Cloud. You’ll be able to run your business from wherever you are, and stay out in the world while you are at work.
by Mr.X
@Gorden: Maybe exponential growth will eliminate all business, at least our human forms of business.
by Gorden Russell
Sure, the rich will still have all the money, but when the age of abundance is here, there will be less real goods for them to spend the money on. Everyone will be able to grow anything they want out of carbon, air, and sunlight. People will still buy and sell the plans to program into the assemblers. After the Sing, the only property worth having will be intellectual property and the real estate to support your solar array.