Comments on: ‘Bi-Fi’ — the biological Internet

By: Katherine MacLean (old science fiction writer and research fan

Katherine MacLean (old science fiction writer and research fan — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:58:52 +0000

Stanford can handle the implications of this. Their esp research shows they can let everyone ignore the staggering implication of verified subliminal brain to brain connections in an ecology that relies on a disconnect between preditor and prey, for food and continuing evolution. The William James research collection of testimony of surprised people who claim to have momentarily experienced a fusion of consciousness with all living beings “The Varieties of Religious Experience,”) and their improved mental health mood and efficiency but inability to explain how it had happened. and that it seemed to have no connection to any established religion was just a personal experience. His indicates that we have the potential, but the necessity of competition between animals makes it necessary to suppress empathy and communication. The ridicule with which the semi-informed thinkers refuse to believe this line of case reports demonstrates to me that they have a right to refuse to know anything that conflicts with their survival. This new research will open an internet of fleshly communication that has often been opened and shut and locked. It is important, yes!, But imagine your mind open to the hatreds and griefs and pains of strangers. Handle with care! Keep it boxed.! .

By: Marcos Marin

Marcos Marin — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:09:47 +0000

We already are. The problem is when we begin hacking each other.

By: Vin

Vin — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 06:29:18 +0000

… if people become programming platforms, the hackers will probably be hacking into themselves. I wonder :D

By: Vin

Vin — Mon, 01 Oct 2012 06:25:38 +0000

Amazing. Biology becoming even more tangibly programmable. It surely will lead to a ‘new Cambrian explosion’ of creativity.

By: Marcos Marin

Marcos Marin — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:39:20 +0000

I would much rather have you allude to archetypal mythology than second hand English poetry. You would not then miss the allusion to the ‘navel’ , ‘marks’ or even the four ‘pillars’ of the world.. and the other three occult names to address.

By: Marcos Marin

Marcos Marin — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:02:41 +0000

Let’s heaaar the bard’s sooong! hahaha yeah, the Old Man of the Sea, if you know your Myth. ;-)

By: Durabys

Durabys — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:37:06 +0000

I have flashbacks to Greg Bears story “Blood Music”..hopefully those guys and gal don’t create Noocytes because we are done for.

By: John Troughton

John Troughton — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:32:04 +0000

This surely is a new future for biology that should be embraced by all

By: Mr.X

Mr.X — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:57:35 +0000

Listen the rhymes of the ancien mariner!

By: Marcos Marin

Marcos Marin — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:53:19 +0000

A few months back a study “proved” cells could communicate information around at a bitrate of LESS THAN 1 BIT (!) That was of the most brainless statements I can’t even conceive, hopefully this shows creativity is smarter than that, even though this is not particularly natural, nature is much more creative than often given credit for.