Biologists engineer algae to make complex anti-cancer ‘designer’ drug
December 13, 2012

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a green alga used widely in biology laboratories, can produce many kinds of “designer proteins” (credit: Nathan Schoepp/University of California – San Diego)
Biologists at UC San Diego have succeeded in genetically engineering algae to produce what has been a complex and expensive human therapeutic drug used to treat cancer.
Their achievement opens the door for making these and other “designer” proteins in larger quantities and much more cheaply than can now be made from mammalian cells.
“Because we can make the exact same drug in algae, we have the opportunity to drive down the price down dramatically,” said Stephen Mayfield, a professor of biology at UC San Diego and director of the San Diego Center for Algae Biotechnology (SD-CAB), a consortium of research institutions that is also working to develop new biofuels from algae.
Their method could even be used to make novel complex designer drugs that could be used to treat cancer or other human diseases in new ways.
“You can’t make these drugs in bacteria, because bacteria are incapable of folding these proteins into these complex, three-dimensional shapes,” said Mayfield. “And you can’t make these proteins in mammalian cells because the toxin would kill them.”
The advance is the culmination of seven years of work in Mayfield’s laboratory to demonstrate that Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a green alga used widely in biology laboratories as a genetic model organism, can produce a wide range of human therapeutic proteins in greater quantity and more cheaply than bacteria or mammalian cells.
In May of this year, Mayfield’s group working with another team headed by Joseph Vinetz from UC San Diego’s School of Medicine, engineered algae to produce an even more complex protein — a new kind of vaccine that preliminary experiments suggest could protect billions of people from malaria.
“What the development of the malarial vaccine showed us was that algae could produce proteins that were really complex structures, containing lots of disulfide bonds that would still fold into the correct three-dimensional structures,” said Mayfield. “Antibodies were the first sophisticated proteins we made. But the malarial vaccine is complex, with disulfide bonds that are pretty unusual. So once we made that, we were convinced we could make just about anything in algae.”
In their latest development, the scientists genetically engineered algae to produce a complex, three-dimensional protein with two “domains” — one of which contains an antibody, which can home in on and attach to a cancer cell and another domain that contains a toxin that kills the bound cancer cells. Such “fusion proteins” are presently created by pharmaceutical companies in a complex, two-step process by first developing the antibody domain in a Chinese hamster, or CHO, cell. The antibody is purified, then chemically attached to a toxin outside of the cell. Then the final protein is re-purified.
“Can we string together four or five domains and produce a designer protein in algae with multiple functions that doesn’t exist in nature? I think we can?” he added. “Suppose I want to couple a receptor protein with a series of activator proteins so that I could stimulate bone production or the production of neurons? At some point you can start thinking about medicine the same way we think about assembling a computer, combining different modules with specific purposes. We can produce a protein that has one domain that targets the kind of cell you want to impact, and another domain that specifies what you want the cell to do.”
The research project was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and The Skaggs Family Foundation.
Comments (10)
by asiwel
I’m not particularly worried about errata but I do appreciate spell-checking and I have begun to notice that this KurzweilAI Comment box of late seems to have been given an automatic, as-you-type, SPELLCHECKER now. YEA!! and Thank You! (Funny, the spellchecker thinks KurzweilAI is not a proper word :-} Now, next, the submitter needs to be able to edit the comment (say for 3 minutes) after it has been submitted. And while on this unrelated subject, what does “Awaiting Approval” mean? For some comments but not for others? And furthermore, one of those little up-or-down VOTE boxes used by various chat sites and discussion boards that readers can click on might help discourage some of the miscellaneous incendiary rhetoric of late on the site.
by asiwel
Ha, recently I have been using FIREFOX browser. It would be embarrassingly funny if this “spellchecker” I mentioned is a feature of the browser and not the website!
by asiwel
Well .. looks that way. IE8 is just too old-fashioned, I guess. Sorry about that.
by Bri
This is an under appreciated article. What these researchers have achieved will open up a whole new era of drug production. It will stream line the time and reduce the costs considerably. Designing proteins specific to a persons genome is the future of medicine. This will make that an affordable reality. It’s a pleasure to read of this breakthrough. Algea have the potential to produce innumerable compounds at an unbelievably low cost.
by asiwel
I definitely agree that this is extremely important. Not sure, but I suppose that producing a drug using algae that is identical to an expensive, already approved and patented, pharmaceutical … results in a “generic” form of the drug … and so all of these breakthroughs await, what?, 14 years of patent protection? Or perhaps the drug company can just license the procedure and start cranking out the medicine “inexpensively” until then while still charging the same – to “recover” its R&D costs. On the other hand, R&D for new drugs can begin here with this sort of new technology and/or synthetic biology. Then those costs might not be so high, the time to market shorter, and the cost to the consumer much less.
by Dennis R.
Dear editor,
“to produce a complex and expensive human therapeutic drug used to treat cancer.”
Should that be INexpensive?
by Bri
That’s it! Up against the wall! Shall I get the Pink Floyd album out? Maybe you have a cat of nine tails whip handy? Maybe you wouldn’t mind if I check out your work and point out in a nit picky way, any small errors you make, and if your flawless we’ll make a bronze statue of you and worship it. If you actually want to keep tabs on her you’ll see she makes many small mistakes. I don’t see any reason to focus on them. Instead I focus on the prodigious output of informative articles. Let’s try to be more constructive, not deconstructionist. I’m sure if she spent more time proof reading these little anomalies. I’d rather she spent her time on more valuable activities.
by Editor
“she makes many small mistakes”: I’d appreciate knowing about them
by Editor
Thanks. I just revised it to read: … “produce what has been a complex and expensive human therapeutic drug…” — more clear?
by Gorden Russell
This is a great development. Just providing a vaccine for malaria would be great enough…but to stimulate bone and neuron growth is greater still.