Can a picture inflate the perceived truth of true and false claims?
August 9, 2012
Trusting research over their guts, scientists in New Zealand and Canada examined the phenomenon that Stephen Colbert, comedian and news satirist, calls “truthiness” — the feeling that something is true.
In four different experiments they discovered that people believe claims are true, regardless of whether they actually are true, when a decorative photograph appears alongside the claim.
“We wanted to examine how the kinds of photos people see every day — the ones that decorate newspaper or TV headlines, for example — might produce “truthiness,” said lead investigator Eryn J. Newman of Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. “We were really surprised by what we found.”
In a series of four experiments in both New Zealand and Canada, Newman and colleagues showed people a series of claims such as, “The liquid metal inside a thermometer is magnesium” and asked them to agree or disagree that each claim was true. In some cases, the claim appeared with a decorative photograph that didn’t reveal if the claim was actually true — such as a thermometer. Other claims appeared alone.
When a decorative photograph appeared with the claim, people were more likely to agree that the claim was true, regardless of whether it was actually true.
Across all the experiments, the findings fit with the idea that photos might help people conjure up images and ideas about the claim more easily than if the claim appeared by itself. “We know that when it’s easy for people to bring information to mind, it ‘feels’ right,” said Newman.
The research has important implications for situations in which people encounter decorative photos, such as in the media or in education. “Decorative photos grab people’s attention,” Newman said. “Our research suggests that these photos might have unintended consequences, leading people to accept information because of their feelings rather than the facts.”
We added a photo to make you believe this post :) — Ed.
The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Comments (9)
by MikeB
OR … If you spent every second of every day questioning all the claims presented to you, you wouldn’t have much of a life. Instead, we question things that _matter_ to us. What’s in a thermometer? Who cares as long as it ndicates temperature as accurately as required for a given circumstance. This study illustrates trivially that we give credence to _banalities_ when it looks like someone made the effort to make more than just a stated claim. The study would have likely been different if their answers had real, physical consequences.
by Phil Osborn
There’s a simple explanation. In the mid ’90′s, I purchased a used Amiga 500 system for the software and accessories that included a crude video capture system that came with it. This system could capture 1~2 frames of incoming composite video per second – b/w only, I think – and display it on screen and record it on the HD at that speed.
So, I connected my VCR/tuner and brought up a network newscast and was startled to realize that suddenly I was seeing all the camera angles and a host of other information that had previously been effectively invisable to my consciousness. I could see WHY they moved to a particular camera setup. Recently I realized WHY I suddenly acquired that enhanced processing capability… Bandwidth. Simple enough?
I was able to see all that stuff because a high percentage of the stuff that usually crowded my mental circuits was missing, like 29 or so frames per second that I didn’t need to process, along with the relatively hi-definition and full color.
Here we have quite likely a reverse example of the same process. In fact, I also thought of that as soon as the first insight occured. I concluded that if the admen were NOT taking advantage of this information overload to swamp our judgment, then they were stupid. So, when and how much? Who is using our TV or internet screen to systematically overload or emphasize what they want to sell – detergent or politics? I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader…
by trent
BEST.COMMENT.EVER
by Paul
So this is why AI needs to eat humanities lunch.
by SpottedMarley
If people were encouraged to remain more conscious in general, people would notice more, think more and understand more. Our great modern society, however, likes to keep it’s citizens just conscious enough to continue glady accepting whatever information they’re fed, regardless of the little picture next to the talking head.
by Bri
I spotted Bob Marley once in a restaurant called Nirvanas. Such a genius, such a humanitarian. I consider it an honor to have been so close, two tables over. I could hear thier whole conversation. Are you the spotted marley that appears when I google your handle. Many wise words from you.
by asiwel
Apparently seeing .. any thing .. is believing .. any thing.
by Chuck Grigsby
I believe everything Steven Colbert says, and many things he doesn’t say but only hints at.
by Chris
“We added a photo to make you believe this post — Ed. ” <– This was enough to make me check the references lol