Cosmic radiation found harmful to astronauts during space travel
January 2, 2013

This NASA spaceship design for a trip to/from Mars may not fully protect astronauts (credit: NASA)
Cosmic radiation — which would bombard astronauts on deep space missions to places like Mars — could accelerate the onset of Alzheimer’s disease, a new study in the open-access journal PLOS ONE shows.
“Galactic cosmic radiation poses a significant threat to future astronauts,” said M. Kerry O’Banion, M.D., Ph.D., a professor in the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy and the senior author of the study.
“The possibility that radiation exposure in space may give rise to health problems such as cancer has long been recognized. However, this study shows for the first time that exposure to radiation levels equivalent to a mission to Mars could produce cognitive problems and speed up changes in the brain that are associated with Alzheimer’s disease.”
While space is full of radiation, the earth’s magnetic field generally protects the planet and people in low earth orbit from these particles. But once astronauts leave orbit, they are exposed to constant shower of various radioactive particles. With appropriate warning, astronauts can be shielded from dangerous radiation associated with solar flares. But there are also other forms of cosmic radiation that cannot be effectively blocked.
Because this radiation exists in low levels, the longer an astronaut is in deep space, the greater the exposure. This is a concern for NASA, which is planning manned missions to a distant asteroid in 2021 and to Mars in 2035. The round trip to Mars, in particular, could take as long as three years.
For over 25 years, NASA has been funding research to determine the potential health risks of space travel in an effort to both develop countermeasures and determine whether or not the risks warranted sending men and women on extended missions in deep space.
Since that time, several studies have demonstrated the potential cancer, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal impact of galactic cosmic radiation. The new study for the first time examines the potential impact of space radiation on neurodegeneration; in particular, the biological processes in the brain that contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s disease. O’Banion — whose research focuses on how radiation affects the central nervous system — and his team have been working with NASA for over eight years.
High-mass, high-charged (HZE) particles

Sections of rat neurovascular tissue were stained with ICAM-1, an indirect marker of CNS damage or inflammation. Left: no radiation; right: 100 cGy iron-particle irradiation at Brookhaven Lab. Images are at 20x magnification and the scale bar is 10 microns. (Credit: Jonathan D. Cherry et al./PLOS ONE)
The researchers studied the impact of a particular form of radiation called high-mass, high-charged (HZE) particles. These particles — which are propelled through space at very high speeds by the force of exploding stars — come in many different forms. For this study the researcher chose iron particles. Unlike hydrogen protons, which are produced by solar flares and can be blocked, the high mass of HZE particles such as iron, combined with their speed, enable them to penetrate solid objects such as the wall and protective shielding of a spacecraft.
“Because iron particles pack a bigger wallop it is extremely difficult from an engineering perspective to effectively shield against them,” said O’Banion. “One would have to essentially wrap a spacecraft in a six-foot block of lead or concrete.”
A portion of the research was conducted at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island. NASA located its research operation at Brookhaven to take advantage of the Lab’s particle accelerators which — by colliding matter together at very high speeds — can reproduce the radioactive particles found in space.
Mice show symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease.
The researchers specifically wanted to examine whether or not radiation exposure had the potential to accelerate the biological and cognitive indicators of Alzheimer’s disease, particularly in individuals who may be predisposed to developing the disease. To accomplish this they chose study the impact on animal models of Alzheimer’s disease. These particular models have been extensively studied and scientists understand the precise time frame in which the disease progresses over time.
At Brookhaven, the animals were exposed to various doses of radiation, including levels comparable to what astronauts would experience during a mission to Mars. Back in Rochester, a team of researchers — including URMC graduate student Jonathan Cherry who was first author on the paper — evaluated the cognitive and biological impact of the exposure.
The mice underwent a series of experiments during which they had to recall objects or specific locations. The researchers observed that mice exposed to radiation were far more likely to fail these tasks — suggesting neurological impairment — earlier than these symptoms would typically appear.
The brains of the mice also showed signs of vascular alterations and a greater than normal accumulation of beta amyloid, the protein “plaque” that accumulates in the brain and is one of the hallmarks of the disease.
“These findings clearly suggest that exposure to radiation in space has the potential to accelerate the development of Alzheimer’s disease,” said O’Banion. “This is yet another factor that NASA, which is clearly concerned about the health risks to its astronauts, will need to take into account as it plans future missions.”
The study was funded by NASA.
Comments (19)
by Jack
The creation of a magnetic field around the space vehicle would possibly solve the problem. Or is this solution too simple or not possible?
by eric
http://marsartists.blogspot.com/2013/01/obscene-headline-seeking-pos-plos-study.html
by Jim Mooney
But thanks to Einstein, the accelerated astronauts will age less. Okay, a few picoseconds – quibble, quibble.
by John Goodrich
Absent the science necessary to construct effective cosmic ray screening and artificial gravity, it is just foolishly risky to send humans into space.
If the AI people are correct, we will have human equivalent robots which will be able to do all a human can do and with greater efficiency and less cost in about 20 years . We can wait until then and in the twenty years after that, with the continued exponential growth in robotics and super-human AI , we will then have all the scientific know-how necessary to allow humans into space completely safely if we still want to do that ..
The protection now afforded astronauts utilizing current science is far too shoddy and space is far too hostile an environment for unaided or insufficiently aided human space flight .
There are also far better uses for the resources expended to make these unnecessarily showy and expensive space ventures which are, far too often, military in nature .
by Jason
There seems to be a potential flaw in this, and maybe related studies in that the researchers are dosing the rats with three years worth of cosmic radiation in a much shorter period of time. Low levels of radiation and high-energy particles over an extended period of time might allow the body to regenerate and repair itself. But give the equivalent exposure in say a week or a day or less and the body has no time to do damage control. I’m not saying exposure to the types of particles these studies are tracking is safe, but I wonder if they’re safer than the results seem to indicate.
by Dorian
Any chance that a highly magnetized rotating saucer could deflect these ions? I used to think that these gizmos use magnetic propulsion but apparently they have other uses.
by Bri
The problem with cosmic radiation is how it was made. These are extremely energetic particles, usually atoms stripped of there electrons, and shoddily by at near light speeds.. These particles reek havoc on solid metal, let alone squishy flesh.. The earths magnetic field traps this, and diverts it to the poles.Similiar shielding could be developed..
by GAUSS
We have to create shields to protect from the full spectrum of radiation. There are ways to do this using today’s tech, but they would be too bulky and expensive to take out on a craft. Maybe just send robotic astronauts until we figure this whole thing out.
by GatorALLin
Is there any trick where they can see what radiation particles are coming at you and then send out equal waves of energy to cancel or neutralize the effects? A reverse radiation suit of some kind?
…all I could think about when I read this is that sending humans to explore space is like sending fish to explore the land on a hot sunny day….
…lets hope that the research that comes from this will help the rest of us here on earth (fix negative effects of Alzheimer’s, or combat radiation poisoning, etc). Maybe if they can truly crack our own DNA codes, we can just regrow anything/everything we need or send the body into a repair sequence without limits?
by alliwant
“The stars are not for man,” wrote Arthur C. Clarke sixty years ago, and we are finding out more and more reasons why he was right. Send the robots, they can be engineered for the hazards of space.
by Steve Waclo
Sounds like one more reason to stay home and fix Mother Earth!
Bots can learn all we need to know :-)
Best wishes and Happt New Year, all.
by Bri
Not for nothing, there is no magnetic core to Mars, so being on it’s surface is like being in space.
by Steve Waclo
Not quite like being in space, but close enough to be troublesome for long term visitors.
by Sara Peterson
Just send the bots : )
by Asteroid Miner
Please read this book: “Radiation and Reason, The impact of Science on a culture of fear” by Wade Allison.
http://www.radiationandreason.com/
Professor Allison says we can take up to 10 rems per month, a little more than 1000 times the present “legal” limit. The old limit was 5 rems/lifetime. A single dose of 800 rems could kill you, but if you have time to recover between doses of 10 rems, no problem. It is like donating blood: You see “4 gallon donor” stickers on cars. You know they didn’t give 4 gallons all at once. There is a threshold just over 10 rems. You are getting .35 rems/year NATURAL background radiation right where you are right now.
Divide 5 rems by your present Natural Background Radiation. For Americans, Natural Background Radiation is at least .35 rems/year. Our Natural Background Radiation uses up our 5 rems/lifetime when we are 14 years old.
Natural Background Radiation is radiation that was always there, 1000 years ago, a million years ago, etc. Natural Background Radiation comes from the rocks in the ground and from exploding stars thousands of light years away. All rocks contain uranium. Radon gas is a decay product of uranium.
by Bri
I live on Long Island, it’s an Alluvial plane( crushed rocks from a glacier). Radon comes from granite, and other igneous rock, not too much radon around here. It leaked out long ago. Radon is a problem in basements that are near non weathered bedrock.
by deadalus
time to start looking for alternatives to the 6 foot block of lead approach! Shields up!
by gaoptimize
The majority of tissue damage from ionizing radiation come from chemical interactions in the ionization trail, not primary collisions. They should have put some of the mice on high-end anti-oxidants and compared the symptoms with the regular diet mice.
by Michael
“You don’t say?!” =P Definitely going to need shielding and artificial gravity for extended space missions.