By: Bri

Bri — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:04:07 +0000

Another really important point is the net energy gain we can get from robotics. In the past it was the power of labor that made any indever. We have leveraged machines to increase productivity. That’s how we have been able to adapt. It was still only a leverage point. Now that’s changed, because they are starting to surpass us in all respects. We can’t compete. No matter how much we integrate, they will have the edge, because they are designed specifically to a task. Something that would take evolution eons to do. What tasks we weigh them to do will define our future.

By: Bri

Bri — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:40:49 +0000

I’m sorry to say, that it’s a done deal. All that will be inside a robots head in a few years, with , rock , paper , hands, speed. No more Mc donalds workers, no more sanitation workers. Think of construction sites. Would you want to carry insurance for workers death, or a CHEAP machine , that doesn’t miss read the blue prints, or sever the gas lines, or not fasten something together right. We all can benefit from this. We all will. It’s inevitable. Not even billionaires will be able to compete with roboust A I . AI’s eyes are already fixed on finance. It’s still sleeping. Kinda grogy right now, but waking up. Like I said, Ramona has a soul. It’s an emergent property. The same is true of the life form that is munching on the globe. Now, because of the Internet, it has a nervous system. We as cells in this nervous system can communicate to the primary driving centers, and steer it’s course. Taxes is one proposition, but there is a more central position. Municipalities strive for it to fund their pensions. They spread the risk, by investing across the board, to minimize exposure. But the returns don’t reflect the true valuations. The top one percent owns most of it. When the ratio gets as bad as it is now, often revolutions start. When my father bought this house it cost twenty four thousand dollars. He made eight in a year. Three years straight pay could buy it . Everyone told him it was crazy to pay the mortgage and survive. But then there was just his income. Now in order to buy this house with three years income I’d have to make 150 thousand a year. Before the crash, 200 thousand. It’s the relativity of goods. That’s a fictitious number. Do you know how much a billion dollars is. If you spent a thousand dollars a day, since Jesus was around, you’d still have over three hundred years to go! The relativity of goods is set by people who rig it in there favor. What’s worse is that they can’t even begin to spend it, and our economy is a consumer economy. Once there are no more jobs left. In order to continue as a consumer economy, they are gonna have to give us money to spend. End of story. Period. It’s the singularity. Even manufacturing can be done at the final destination. Like I said even billionaires won’t be able to compete. How this settles out, I don’t know, but it won’t be pretty for a while. The fabric of society is ripping apart and people seem more interested in their pets.

By: Gorden Russell

Gorden Russell — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:56:43 +0000

Did you see where the article said Vulcan will be used for fabrication and manufacturing? This computer will put a lot of people out of work when it starts running highly automated factories. Our legislators have to step in and make it pay the unemployment taxes of all the workers it replaces.

Comments on: Deep Computing Solutions

By: Bri

By: Bri

By: Gorden Russell