DIY BioPrinter
January 28, 2013

DIY BioPrinter (credit: BioCurious/Instructables)
Bioprinting is printing with biological materials.
There’s a lot of work being done at research labs and big companies like Organovo on print human tissues and human organs, with an eye towards drug testing, and transplantation into humans.
Check out these amazing TED talks by Anthony Atala, for example:
Anthony Atala: Growing new organs
Anthony Atala: Printing a human kidney
The basic technologies are very accessible — based on inkjet and/or 3D printing. So a bunch of us at BioCurious decided we wanted to play around with this technology ourselves — and the BioPrinter Community Project was born! (Come join us, every Thursday evening at BioCurious!)
We wrote this instructable in part to document our project for our fellow Citizen Scientists in the DIYbio community. For a quick 1-minute intro, you may want to check this little video.”
(Read more on Instructables)
Comments (7)
by godot
“See the cat? See the cradle?”
–Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
(Great explanation.)
by Bucephalos
Today, in scant few hours, we see three news (a lot IMO) on 3D printing technology.
When can we print out whole organisms (even complex, intelligent animals)? Will probably sooner then we expect.
When that happens, then “Bringing Back the Dead” will be possible.
All people who had lived, or could had lived but did not have the chance to, will be brought back and given a new life.
Possibly, if resources are not scarce to allow that, we can bring back more than one copy per historical person.
That will make the world (aside from the Singularity) a very fun place.
There is a KurzweilAI page that is somehow related to this idea.
http://www.kurzweilai.net/ray-kurzweil-googles-director-of-engineering-wants-to-bring-the-dead-back-to-life
by deadalus
while i agree that complex tissues and organs are within a deckade or two’s reach, i wouldent exspect bringing back the dead and unborn life forms, could be some moral issues that keep that from happening? just maybe? anyways thats a very rudimentry printer and its not even 3d, so they can make lines of yeast.. we could already dol that with a machine for over a deckade so nothing truely new here, unless \I missed something.
by WLGJR
As soon the technology is available, all those moral issues will be circumvented (or simply ignored) if there are people want to profit from these techs.
If people all perfectly follow moral rules, such things as puppy farms (Google it – very disturbing) would not exist.
by Gorden Russell
I am very glad that you came to visit us here, Beucphalos. I always like to meet somebody who takes their screen name from Greek Mythology.
Here’s a place for the people brought back from the dead: HD 108874b, in the constellation Coma Berenices. The star is spectral type G5, a little bit cooler than Sol, our own G2 class star. The planet HD 108874b has a semimajor axis of 1.051 AU, so it is so close to having an orbit like ours, that it makes no never-mind. Its orbital period is 395.4 days, so you will need to write up a calendar with a 13th month to shoehorn in between January and February. Maybe we can name that month after Ray Kurzweil, but only if his fans sponsor the starship that first gets there. It could happen. There will be a lot of robots and 3D printers turning asteroids into starships after the year 2046. You can count on that. That’s about the time we will be bringing back the dead (more or less). Some of those robots will belong to somebody reading this post today.
This world has a mass of 1.36 Jupiter masses, so it is big enough to have moons larger than Io, Ganymede, Europa or Callisto. This means that this planet will have a magnetosphere greater than Jupiter’s (which stretches out to cover the first three of those moons…this means that an even larger world could keep it’s moons from losing their atmospheres to the wind blasting off of the surface of that star). (But there is the added problem that Jupiter’s first three large moons are blasted by ionizing radiation from Jupiter…Callisto is out of range of the radiation, but being that far out gives it such a long day that I fear photosynthetic plants might not make it through the long night.)
Yet, “It is expected that any moons orbiting this planet are enriched in carbon” (from Wikipedia). But since moons end up locked in by gravitational tides so that one face is always facing the mother planet, I don’t have much hope for a moon having a day short enough for even cyanobacteria to evolve. But not to worry.
Planets have spots along their orbits where the gravity of the star evens out with the gravity of the planet so that things in these spots can just park there. These are Lagrangian Points. Our planet Jupiter has a large number of asteroids leading and following it along its orbit, these are called Trojan asteroids. The Greek camp leads Jupiter by 60 degrees along its orbit and the Trojan camp follows by the same distance. There are as many asteroids in these two camps as there are in the Main Asteroid Belt. No kiddin’.
This means that any gas giant orbiting a G-class star could have large worlds preceding it or following it in its own orbit. That would be far enough away for those worlds to keep their spin and have a molten core of spinning nickel-iron to give them a magnetic field that would keep their atmospheres from being blown away by the stellar wind of the host star.
Even if the star HD 108874 doesn’t have such a planet, the Kepler mission has seen a few other gas giants in the Goldilocks Zones of their stars. There is one such world that is over six times the mass of Jupiter, so it could easily hold an Earth-sized planet in one of its Trojan Points.
In time humanity will find such a world and populate it with Benjamin Franklin, Edgar Allen Poe, Einstein, Edison, and Anne Frank and her family. There is a lot of room out there in the stars.
by Gorden Russell
Oh, sorry Bucephalus, I was thinking of Pegasus. Bucephalus is a name from the history of Alexander the Great.
by WLGJR
I suggest tearing down the planets to make such rotating habitats such as Bernal Sphere, Stanford Torus, ONeil cylinders, Bishop Rings ,Banks Orbital or Globus Cassus.
This way more surface area is created and allows larger population.
The population can be less concentrated (spread over many habitats) and minimize the casualty in accidents.
As for “Starships”, I prefer smaller ones (diameter less than 1m) containing uploadees, as accelerating large ships to just a significant fraction of C (not to mention impossible FTL) make impacts with small interstellar dust particles fatal.
Minimize the ship’s size is a crucial development to be made.
The people working at 100YSS should put some effort into study how to deflect these dusts and other possible objects that we may collide with.