Gene mutation associated with ‘Internet addiction,’ German researchers suggest
August 30, 2012
Researchers from the University of Bonn and the Central Institute of Mental Health in Mannheim found that “problematic” Internet users, especially women, are more often carriers of a variation in the CHRNA4 gene, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene, which that also plays a major role in nicotine addiction and generation of dopamine.
The T- variant (CC genotype) of the rs1044396 polymorphism on the CHRNA4 gene occurred significantly more frequently*, the researchers report. “The CC variant of rs1044396 has been associated with significantly higher trait anxiety and smoking,” the researchers note.
Over the past years, the Bonn researchers interviewed a total of 843 people about their Internet habits. An analysis of the questionnaires showed that 132 men and women in this group exhibited “problematic behavior” in how they handle the online medium, and they selected that group for the study. (There was no significant difference in smoking status.)
The research used a measure of generalized Internet addiction called the Internet Addiction Test, which has 20 items that measure “different facets of Internet addiction such as the Web’s impact on social or work life.”
The researchers state that for the selected group, “all their thoughts revolve around the Internet during the day, and they feel their well being is severely impacted if they have to go without it.” The study found the “addicts” spent 16.85 a week (2.4 hours a day) on the Internet in leisure, vs. 9.68 per week for controls.
What exactly is “Internet addiction”?
The researchers admit that the poorly defined research term “Internet addiction” is “still a matter of debate, because people are not addicted to the Internet per se, but to diverse contents of the World Wide Web such as the use of multiplayer-online games, social networks, or pornography. The researchers note that “Internet addiction” is included in the appendix of the DSM-5, “showing its potential to be acknowledged as an own behavioral addiction in the future.”
“A limitation of this study is that our investigated group of Internet addicts only consists of persons with occasional but not frequent problems in everyday life due to the use of the Internet” and ”it needs to be tested whether CHRNA4 also targets specialized Internet addiction, such as excessive use of social media. … A last limitation of this study represents the rather small sample size.”
Internet addiction has a prevalence between 0.3% and 10.6% in the population, depending on the investigated country culture, according to a 2008 study.
However, Internet addiction is estimated to be only about 1% in Germany, suggesting limitations on selecting a relevant and useful study population.
UPDATE 8/31/2012:
* 36 subjects (out of a total of 132 participants with problematic Internet use, after screening 850 participants) had the T- variant (CC genotype) of the rs1044396 polymorphism on the CHRNA4 gene vs. 22 out of a total of 132 for controls. For males it was 18 vs. 15 for controls and for females it was 18 vs. 7 for controls.)
“Given our a priori hypothesis together with the significant statistics (which hold for multiple testing), I am convinced that the results are robust,” lead author Dr. Christian Montag told KurzweilAI. “Nevertheless there is a BUT: in molecular genetics replication studies are of special importance and we’d like to encourage other work groups to look at this issue.”

Comments (17)
by Scienco
How can women be more affected than men if the same number of males and females have the mutation?
Read it: “For males it was 18 vs. 15 for controls and for females it was 18 vs. 7 for controls.)”!
That is, the same number of males and females (18) addicted to internet have the mutation! So can you say that women are more affected?!!!!
by Jan Parker
moron phd fodder, welcome to the obvious. But the genes are plastic, maybe being on the computer changed the genes to better adapt to the new tech? Oh that would be Dr. Captian Ovious.
by Guy from Germany
As a German myself, I can safely say that Germany is still a very conservative country and they play the “addiction” card whenever they can, mostly to conjure up some new draconian proposals / a new law or policy to restrict internet freedom or scapegoating certain undesirable fragments of the population. So it’s always very insidious if so called experts use the word “addiction”. The whole country and politics are interspersed with the Post Hoc fallacy.
by Foye Lowe
Certainly some of the diction in ads is questionable, but perhaps that’s how language evolves. :)
p.s. For some of us, impulsivity and compulsivity is simply due to having a pulse.
by Giulio Prisco
I am sure pre-verbal apes growled against addiction to language, in their caves, looking at the outrageously unPC new generation of talking apes.
This is usually one of the last defenses of luddites, when they are already outclassed and outsmarted, and know that.
by Gorden Russell
Just think what it will be like when we have computers in the hippocampus. We’ll be enmeshed in the world-wide-web 24 hours a day. We’ll be online in our sleep, surfing the cybersphere in our dreams.
by melajara
Internet is a mirror of the world, you find in it everything the world has to offer. Can you have an addiction to the world or its mirror? Put that way shows how loose a concept as “internet addiction” really is.
I suggest a much more specific study on kurzweil.ai.net internet addiction ;-)
And no, thanks, I don’t want to be cured from my epistemophilic drive.
by Editor
There are some addictions that are healthy, like air, water … and KurzweilAI! :)
by Bri
Here I though I’d have to seek a rehab program for my KurzweilAI addiction!
by Bri
You know of course that if they do find it addicting, then you are a dealer. Uh ohhhhh! Here comes the thought police!
by Khannea Suntzu
KurzweilAI is my daily hopeporn.
Its what gets me out of bed in the morn.
if only people would listen when I warn
right here right now the future is born
by Khannea Suntzu
w…what??
by Lord Penguin
There are statistics about the study, including the total number of subjects, the number of “addicts”, and the time spent on the internet for each group, but it’s missing the most important part… the amount of “addicts” that have the gene, vs “non-addicts” with the gene.
by Editor
A good question. UPDATE 8/31/2012:
* 36 subjects (out of a total of 132 participants with problematic Internet use, after screening 850 participants) had the T- variant (CC genotype) of the rs1044396 polymorphism on the CHRNA4 gene vs. 22 out of a total of 132 for controls. For males it was 18 vs. 15 for controls and for females it was 18 vs. 7 for controls.)
“Given our a priori hypothesis together with the significant statistics (which hold for multiple testing), I am convinced that the results are robust,” lead author Dr. Christian Montag told KurzweilAI. “Nevertheless there is a BUT: in molecular genetics replication studies are of special importance and we’d like to encourage other work groups to look at this issue.”
by BipedalJoe
No gene mutation does not cause internet addiction.. gene mutations predispose addictive phenotype. C´mon Kurzweil, u know better then to use pseudo-thesis’s as topics. If I see another one on my twitter, you´re off my sponge-web-ish cloud ;)
by Gabriel
Sorry if I’m mistaken, but as far as I know..the only thing Kurzweil himself does on this website is the rare ‘Ask Ray” q&a’s….he doesn’t actually post the topics himself or anything…I imagine he’s too busy to actually manage this site, especially on a daily basis.
Unless of course you were referring to the website and not the actual person; in which case, ignore me.
by Editor
Right. Headline modified. Ray is not involved directly on this site.