<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hallucinations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/hallucinations/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/hallucinations</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:26:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARaiken</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/hallucinations/comment-page-1#comment-47002</link>
		<dc:creator>ARaiken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=168549#comment-47002</guid>
		<description>I would appreciate something a little more open minded and not quite so subjective. He is clearly a materialist pushing that point of view with little to no empirical approach to his research. If you believe that everything is based out of the brain then you dismiss all other possibilities and can only interpret results based off of this bias. If someone where to honestly look at all the evidences then many things he is attributing to being hallucination don&#039;t hold up. No, I think I would find a more balanced approach. Despite the fact he&#039;s clearly telling the article writer exactly what he wants to hear. Proof of his own theories about the world. The Materialist Myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would appreciate something a little more open minded and not quite so subjective. He is clearly a materialist pushing that point of view with little to no empirical approach to his research. If you believe that everything is based out of the brain then you dismiss all other possibilities and can only interpret results based off of this bias. If someone where to honestly look at all the evidences then many things he is attributing to being hallucination don&#8217;t hold up. No, I think I would find a more balanced approach. Despite the fact he&#8217;s clearly telling the article writer exactly what he wants to hear. Proof of his own theories about the world. The Materialist Myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
