How to build a robotic bat wing
February 26, 2013

A robotic bat wing lets researchers measure forces, joint movements, and flight parameters, and learn more about how the real thing operates in nature (credit: Breuer and Swartz labs/Brown University)
Researchers at Brown University have developed a robotic bat wing that is providing valuable new information about dynamics of flapping flight in real bats — the function of ligaments, the elasticity of skin, the structural support of musculature, skeletal flexibility, upstroke, and downstroke.
The strong, flapping flight of bats offers great possibilities for the design of small aircraft, among other applications.
The robot, which mimics the wing shape and motion of the lesser dog-faced fruit bat, is designed to flap while attached to a force transducer in a wind tunnel.
As the lifelike wing flaps, the force transducer records the aerodynamic forces generated by the moving wing. By measuring the power output of the three servo motors that control the robot’s seven movable joints, researchers can evaluate the energy required to execute wing movements.
Testing showed the robot can match the basic flight parameters of bats, producing enough thrust to overcome drag and enough lift to carry the weight of the model species.
A paper describing the robot and presenting results from preliminary experiments is published in the journal Bioinspiration and Biomimetics. The work was done in labs of Brown professors Kenneth Breuer and Sharon Swartz, who are the senior authors on the paper. Breuer, an engineer, and Swartz, a biologist, have studied bat flight and anatomy for years.
The faux flapper generates data that could never be collected directly from live animals, said Joseph Bahlman, a graduate student at Brown who led the project. Bats can’t fly when connected to instruments that record aerodynamic forces directly, so that isn’t an option.
But the model does exactly what the researchers want it to do. They can control each of its movement capabilities — kinematic parameters — individually. That way they can adjust one parameter while keeping the rest constant to isolate the effects.
“We can answer questions like, ‘Does increasing wing beat frequency improve lift and what’s the energetic cost of doing that?’” Bahlman said. “We can directly measure the relationship between these kinematic parameters, aerodynamic forces, and energetics.”
One experiment looked at the aerodynamic effects of wing folding. Bats and some birds fold their wings back during the upstroke. Previous research from Brown had found that folding helped the bats save energy, but how folding affected aerodynamic forces wasn’t clear. Testing with the robot wing shows that folding is all about lift.
In a flapping animal, positive lift is generated by the downstroke, but some of that lift is undone by the subsequent upstroke, which generates negative lift. By running trials with and without wing folding, the robot showed that folding the wing on the upstroke dramatically decreases that negative lift, increasing net lift by 50 percent.
Data like that will not only give new insights into the mechanics of bat flight, it could aid the design of small flapping aircraft.
The robot doesn’t quite match the complexity of a real bat’s wing, which has 25 joints and 34 degrees of freedom. An exact simulation isn’t feasible given today’s technology and wouldn’t be desirable anyway, Bahlman said. Part of why the model is useful is that it distills bat flapping down to five fundamental parameters: flapping frequency, flapping amplitude, the angle of the flap relative to the ground, the amount of time used for the downstroke, and the extent to which the wings can fold back.
“The next step is to start playing with the materials,” he said. “We’d like to try different wing materials, different amounts of flexibility on the bones, looking to see if there are beneficial tradeoffs in these material properties.”
The research was funded by the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the National Science Foundation..
Insert obligatory Batman reference here. — Editor
Comments (10)
by asiwel
This sort of research is fascinating and reminds me of much similar research, such as an article in Scientific American, I think, quite a while ago, about how insects (particularly the fly) fly. I recall/have been led to believe that the mathematics of this sort of “flight” whether through air or through water – the computer algorithms, etc. – are well known. What I have not really understood is why these algorithms have not been applied to artificial magnetic fields in such a way as to allow spacecraft to literally fly or swim against the solar wind.
by Sea bass
Nature already made the wheel, motor, crankshaft, and rotor. ATP synthase uses a spinning wheel to move electrons and generate power. It’s as old as life…
by GatorALLin
..watching these slow motion videos of bats reminds me just how amazing Mother Nature is…. and how far we still have to go to try and catch up or even start to reproduce just a fraction of what it has been doing for hundreds of thousands of years…. I remembered this ted.com video of making a model bird fly…. and hope they could someday do the same for the bat. check out the bird video here http://www.ted.com/talks/a_robot_that_flies_like_a_bird.html?quote=1007
by Bri
Another fascinating thing about mother nature ability to evolve these mechanisms is the number of times different species evolve similar solutions. From pterodactyls to birds to bats. In a few million years flying squirrels would appear very bat like. ( Batman joke: The united States Air Force. Looking for a few good men to be a few good bats.)
by Gorden Russell
Hey Bri, you forgot to mention flying fish and flying squirrels (not to mention pterodactyls).
by Gorden Russell
Oh hell, I read your comment too fast.
by SmartAndSober
But Nature can never evolve wheels and propellers, or not directly (via the human beings).
by Bri
An interesting observation. What brings you to point this out? Nature evolves structures that rely on those principals but what I think you are referring to is connected shafts incorporated in an organism for propulsion. Many animals form wheel shapes for propulsion. Many seeds for propeller shapes for increased dispersal. I’m not sure of the way flagella are connected to bacterium. They may be the closest to a shaft that is acted upon and transfers it’s energy for propulsion. My guess is that the rotational forces sever the contacts to the power house or driving mechanism. It would bd interesting to do a thorough survey of all living things to see if you are correct.
by Jackus
Don’t forget the similarity between sharks, ichthyosaurs and dolphins.
by WLGJR
( Batman joke: The united States Air Force. Looking for a few good men to be a few good bats.)
In Canada they have “Snowbirds”.
http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/snowbirds/index-eng.asp
Looking for a few good men to be a few manly snowbirds.
Oorah!