How to print 3D microstructures in seconds
September 14, 2012

Printing three-dimensional blood vessels in seconds out of soft, biocompatible hydrogels (credit: Biomedical Nanotechnology Laboratory, Chen Research Group, UC San Diego Jacobs School of Engineering)
Nanoengineers at the University of California, San Diego have developed a novel technology that can fabricate, in mere seconds, microscale three dimensional (3D) structures out of soft, biocompatible hydrogels.
Near term, the technology could lead to better systems for growing and studying cells, including stem cells, in the laboratory. Long-term, the goal is to be able to print biological tissues for regenerative medicine.
For example, in the future, doctors may repair the damage caused by heart attack by replacing it with tissue that rolled off of a printer.
The biofabrication technology, called dynamic optical projection stereolithography (DOPsL), was developed in the laboratory of NanoEngineering Professor Shaochen Chen.
Current fabrication techniques, such as photolithography and micro-contact printing, are limited to generating simple geometries or 2D patterns, while stereolithography can print large objects such as tools and car parts.
The difference, says Chen, is in the micro- and nanoscale resolution required to print tissues that mimic nature’s fine-grained details, including blood vessels, which are essential for distributing nutrients and oxygen throughout the body. Without the ability to print vasculature, an engineered liver or kidney, for example, is useless in regenerative medicine.
With DOPsL, Chen’s team was able to achieve more complex geometries common in nature such as flowers, spirals and hemispheres. Other current 3D fabrication techniques, such as two-photon photopolymerization, can take hours to fabricate a 3D part.
How it works
The biofabrication technique uses a computer projection system and precisely controlled micromirrors to shine light on a selected area of a solution containing photo-sensitive biopolymers and cells. This photo-induced solidification process forms one layer of solid structure at a time, but in a continuous fashion.
The technology is part of a new biofabrication technology that Chen is developing under a four-year, $1.5 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01EB012597). The Obama administration in March launched a $1 billion investment in advanced manufacturing technologies, including creating the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute with $30 million in federal funding to focus on 3D printing. The term “additive manufacturing” refers to the way 3D structures are built layering very thin materials.
The Chen Research Group is focused on fabrication of nanostructured biomaterials and nanophotonics for biomedical engineering applications and recently moved into the new Structural and Materials Engineering Building, which is bringing nano and structural engineers, medical device labs and visual artists into a collaborative environment under one roof.
Comments (12)
by Bri
The picture is upside down!
by kwolph
This is powerful information that I enjoyed reading. Here is an easy infographic for further research worth checking out on nanotechnology in medicine. Thank you again for the good read!
http://www.keithley.com/knowledgecenter/How-Nanotechnology-Could-Reengineer-Us
by Bri
Another area of research that this should turbocharge is in kidney and spleen replacement.
by alliwant
Anyone looked into growing replacement heart valves via a similar approach? Replacement valves that don’t require blood thinners could be a great advance.
by GatorALLin
cool to think they are looking at 3d printing from all angles, both mini and huge. Thought this idea to build a house with 3d or additive printing was cool. Maybe we just need to ship to Mars some 3d printing robots that turn the soil into building blocks and so they can start building things now…. then be ready for us when we figure out how to get humans there next… Love this thinking in all extremes …
here is the house 3d printing link for fun. http://youtu.be/JdbJP8Gxqog
by Bri
At the speed of development we are currently experiencing, this stuff will be here before the end of the decade. Think of it in relation to lab grown meat. One of the biggest hurdles is the vascularization. Seed this with those peptide protein cues and it will replace the polymers with cells in no time!
by melajara
I would not be so optimistic here.
I had a small talk today with one person coordinating financing for EPFL projects and she spontaneously wondered about the amount of stunning research results which don’t manifest downstream to products, or do it so late (5 to 10 years).
Please, notice that she said that from the vantage point of view of a top notch public research facility (kurzweilai is regularly reporting from EPFL) from the top productive country in the world! (see http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_CountryProfilHighlights_2011-12.pdf)
It struck a chord with me. Actually, I don’t think there is any acceleration from proof of concept to commercial product launch time.
In critical sectors there is even braking from powerful lobbies abusing their dominant position in the market to fight innovations i.e. not doing so by better counter-innovations but by issuing patents wars.
Nothing new here but lobbying, greed and corruption are globally more powerful than ever!
However, I would love to be proved wrong here.
Maybe Ray could shed a light on this (non?) issue?
by asiwel
Actually, I think that this is certainly becoming a bigger and bigger issue and not simply because we (the consumer audience) are impatient or over-optomistic. Past directors of NIH and NSF are on record as complaining about the delay in the return on tax-payer investment in research, particularly in the area of cancer research. Every article ends with a caveat – “wait 5-10 more years”. But the fact is that time does pass and things do pay off, For instance, finally the amazing payoff of anti-malaria drug research in Africa this year – anticipated by an article in Scientific American, I think, about 5 years ago .. which of course ended “wait 5 years.” The wait appears to be sure worth it! I think the “acceleration” everyone expects is already clearly noticeable and the “economy” will begin to deliver over the next four years, no matter the politics ….
by Bri
I think Rays graphs take this into account. We may have log jambs at different periods of time, but innovation is a lot like a stream. It will pool up till the forces make it go around or bust through. On the chart it appears as events above and below the general curve. There is a definite impeading force now from industries trying to protect their investments and returns. It’s a relatively new phenomena because of things like lobbying, but nobody can stop progress. As things speed up there will be a greater push to implement more quickly.
by Vlad
‘One of the biggest hurdles is the vascularization.’
You should read this research paper:
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/12/13/1115973108.abstract
So this dextran hydrogel is able to completely regenerate skin wounds (full thickness skin excisions), completely prevents scar formation and it can create complex skin structures such as vascular networks, sebaceous glands and hair follicles and can do it without stem cells, cytokines or growth factors! Just like magic!
by Bri
Now that is miraculous! Think of veterans, firefighters, accident victims, birth defects! It goes on and on!
by Jules Ruis
A good alternative is using Fractal Trigeometry.
For more information see: http://www.fractal.org