IBM reveals five innovations that will change our lives within five years
December 18, 2012
IBM announced today the seventh annual “IBM 5 in 5” — a list of innovations that have the potential to change the way people work, live and interact during the next five years, based on market and societal trends as well as emerging technologies from IBM’s R&D labs. This one is focused on cognitive systems.
In the next five years, industries such as retail will be transformed by the ability to “touch” a product through your mobile device, using haptic, infrared and pressure-sensitive technologies to simulate touch — such as the texture and weave of a fabric as a shopper brushes their finger over the image of the item on a device screen.
Each object will have a unique set of vibration patterns that represents the touch experience: short fast patterns, or longer and stronger sets of vibrations. The vibration pattern will differentiate silk from linen or cotton, helping simulate the physical sensation of actually touching the material.
Current uses of haptic and graphic technology in the gaming industry, for example, will take the end user into a simulated environment.

We take 500 billion photos a year[1]. 72 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute[2]. The global medical diagnostic imaging market is expected to grow to $26.6 billion by 2016[3].
In the next five years, “brain-like” capabilities will let computers analyze features in visual media such as color, texture patterns, or edge information and extract insights. This will have a profound impact for industries such as healthcare, retail and agriculture.
These capabilities will be put to work in healthcare by making sense out of massive volumes of medical information, such as MRIs, CT scans, X-Rays and ultrasound images, to capture information tailored to particular anatomy or pathologies. By being trained to discriminate what to look for in images — such as differentiating healthy from diseased tissue — and correlating that with patient records and scientific literature, systems that can “see” will help doctors detect medical problems with far greater speed and accuracy.

Within five years, a distributed system of clever sensors will detect elements of sound such as sound pressure, vibrations and sound waves at different frequencies. It will interpret these inputs to predict when trees will fall in a forest or when a landslide is imminent. Such a system will “listen” to our surroundings and measure movements, or the stress in a material, to warn us if danger lies ahead.
Raw sounds will be detected by sensors, much like the human brain. A system that receives this data will take into account other modalities, such as visual or tactile information, and classify and interpret the sounds based on what it has learned. When new sounds are detected, the system will form conclusions based on previous knowledge and the ability to recognize patterns.
For example, “baby talk” will be understood as a language, telling parents or doctors what infants are trying to communicate. Sounds can be a trigger for interpreting a baby’s behavior or needs. By being taught what baby sounds mean — whether fussing indicates a baby is hungry, hot, tired or in pain — a sophisticated speech recognition system would correlate sounds and babbles with other sensory or physiological information such as heart rate, pulse and temperature.
In the next five years, by learning about emotion and being able to sense mood, systems will pinpoint aspects of a conversation and analyze pitch, tone and hesitancy to help us have more productive dialogues that could improve customer call center interactions, or allow us to seamlessly interact with different cultures.
For example, today, IBM scientists are beginning to capture underwater noise levels in Galway Bay, Ireland to understand the sounds and vibrations of wave energy conversion machines, and the impact on sea life, by using underwater sensors that capture sound waves and transmit them to a receiving system to be analyzed.\

What if we could make healthy foods taste delicious using a different kind of computing system that is built for creativity?
IBM researchers are developing a computing system that detects flavor, to be used with chefs to create the most tasty and novel recipes. It will break down ingredients to their molecular level and blend the chemistry of food compounds with the psychology behind what flavors and smells humans prefer. By comparing this with millions of recipes, the system will be able to create new flavor combinations that pair, for example, roasted chestnuts with other foods such as cooked beetroot, fresh caviar, and dry-cured ham.
A system like this can also be used to help us eat healthier, creating novel flavor combinations that will make us crave a vegetable casserole instead of potato chips.
The computer will be able to use algorithms to determine the precise chemical structure of food and why people like certain tastes. These algorithms will examine how chemicals interact with each other, the molecular complexity of flavor compounds and their bonding structure, and use that information, together with models of perception to predict the taste appeal of flavors.
Not only will it make healthy foods more palatable — it will also surprise us with unusual pairings of foods actually designed to maximize our experience of taste and flavor. In the case of people with special dietary needs, such as individuals with diabetes, it would develop flavors and recipes to keep their blood sugar regulated, but satisfy their sweet tooth.

During the next five years, tiny sensors embedded in your computer or cell phone will detect if you’re coming down with a cold or other illness. By analyzing odors, biomarkers and thousands of molecules in someone’s breath, doctors will have help diagnosing and monitoring the onset of ailments such as liver and kidney disorders, asthma, diabetes and epilepsy by detecting which odors are normal and which are not.
In the next five years, IBM technology will “smell” surfaces for disinfectants to determine whether rooms have been sanitized. Using novel wireless “mesh” networks, data on various chemicals will be gathered and measured by sensors, and continuously learn and adapt to new smells over time.
Due to advances in sensor and communication technologies in combination with deep learning systems, sensors can measure data in places never thought possible. For example, computer systems can be used in agriculture to “smell” or analyze the soil condition of crops. In urban environments, this technology will be used to monitor issues with refuge, sanitation and pollution — helping city agencies spot potential problems before they get out of hand.
Today IBM scientists are already sensing environmental conditions and gases to preserve works of art. This innovation is beginning to be applied to tackle clinical hygiene, one of the biggest challenges in healthcare today.
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which in 2005 was associated with almost 19,000 hospital stay-related deaths in the United States, is commonly found on the skin and can be easily transmitted wherever people are in close contact. One way of fighting MRSA exposure in healthcare institutions is by ensuring medical staff follow clinical hygiene guidelines.

Comments (61)
by Edgar
The future as dictated by marketing. The more they know about you, the better they can personalize their products to “your” needs and wants. On the bright side, I really like the medical applications and would like to have my mom who is a diabetic be able to know exactly what to eat without running into high sugar problems.
by chris
don’t need technology to solve diabetes bro. research raw veganism, you’re mom would only have to do it for a month and would either be completely cured or substantially more healthy with lower insulin intake. trust me.
by Gabriel
Notably, Kurzweil himself is notorious for ‘reprogramming his biochemistry’ to essentially eliminate the profile of being type 2 diabetic; it’s what spurred him on to write his health books alongside Dr.Grossman.
by Tom Armstrong
All this sounds absolutely wonderful, except take my word fot it, many men who have benefited from prostate surgery are left to cope with the debilitating and miserable results of incontinence. If all of these truly mind blowing technological feats are about to become a reality why is it seemingly so difficult to offer what actually amounts to not much more than a simple plumbing repair?
by Jim Mooney
But where is the flying car in everyone’s garage?
by Editor
Cancelled. Only a world market for maybe five flying cars. :)
by PacRim Jim
What happens when this becomes Five Inventions That Will Change Our Lives Every Minute?
We humans are capable of only so much adaptation.
by egore
It appears as though large corporations hold the key to ai. Also the ability to lead or stifle human endeavors.
by egore
It appears to me, as if large Corporations will hold the key to artificial evolution.
by pt
No 3d printing?
by pt
Ah, didn’t read the subtext, specific to cognitive computing, nm. Still epic.
by bruno
This is already a reality now
by {i}Pan~
These corporate messages – like Corning’s glass commercial – are so pedestrian.
Behold the raw, nauseating abyss of acceleration:
http://vimeo.com/16056709
by dbamford
thanks for the link to the wanna-be Tool video. and you talk about pedestrian…
“haptic” feedback and “smell-o-vision” are silly –. The true evolution is “No UI” … voice controls and 3d “screens” or glasses will be all that is needed. People poking at screens with fat fingers is not the future.
by jowen
Most assuredly. This is a bit surprising from the minds at IBM R&D. These guys are no Xerox PARC, that’s for sure. Holy cow, my 11 year old could have come up with these things. Augmented Reality, combined with the next iteration of RFID and GPS will all but do away with the “computer” anyway. Imagine, tablets and touch interface being a thing of the past. Oh, and this will be here far sooner than 5 years from now…
by Bob Roberts
Agreed! Smell-o-vision is silly. Why would you want to smell something on TV (or smell a video on your smart phone)? The smell-o-scope is where it’s happenin’! Smell Mars!
by GAUSS
Fascinating stuff they’re working on. I can’t help but notice that these are some of the building blocks for a truly aware robot, able to interact with the world through senses much like we do.
by Jason Silva fanboy
Not quite clear on the “touch phone” concept – you mean if I try to pet a lolcat, the surface of my screen will arrange itself into thousands/millions of tiny hairs? Within 5 years? Or will somehow electronically trick my finger into thinking I’m touching that many hairs?
by Bri
Can anyone say smellavision?( The Jetsens)
by snake0
Did you even read the article? Nowhere did it mention anything like that.
by de Broglie
snake0′s response is the funniest thing I have read all week.
by Think about it
while technology does not solve the problem of global poverty level, your mission is still incomplete!!
by Dan Robinson
Not poverty itself, but the unequal, or uneqitable, distribution of poverty/wealth, ideally, proportionate to one’s lack/presence of contribution to the larger community.
by PhiGuy110
Cognitive computing = Conscious computer. Conscious Computer = Intelligence Explosion. Intelligence Explosion = Singulairty. Soon, society will come to accept this, and it will be a wonder to watch.
by Bernard
Like most internet innovations the porn industry will be onto touch in a flash.
by Gorden Russell
But it will leave a real mess all over your cell phone, Bernard.
by hohulin
Humans and animals have a multitude of senses beyond the 5 senses. The smart phone already has a lot of them like Balance and acceleration. The science of sensors is very interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense
by trakk
While everything else is getting worse, technology is the only thing getting better.
by Mr.X
Trakk:
What is getting worse!?
I claim: Almost everything is getting better, including and partly because of technology.
by Mr.X
I just got an idea, and a challenge to everyone:
Tell me one problem that can’t be solved by technology, in principle.
Meanwhile, talking about progress et al, maybe this will cheer you up ;) :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYeDsa4Tw0c
by Dennis
The environment is getting worse and with it the biodiversity and food production capabilities of the earth.
by Mr.X
“The environment is getting worse ”
Only if you think “being natural” is something important, and something that can’t be brought back de-facto (things change anyway, so the forrest is never the same).
The latter, of course, is not true.
“with it the biodiversity ”
And where is YOUR problem with that!?
Anyway: Genetics combined with computer science (algorithms) give us the possibility to increase the biodiversity.You literally can’t imagine the possible combinations.
Technology might even, if regulations are not put in place, allow us to bring back much of the “lost” species.In addition to creating new species.
” food production capabilities”
Technology can easily outstrip any environmental factors that you might think about. Think a moment about this: Assembly line meat.
Anyway: We throw away tons of food because we already produce much more than we need.
Once again, the problem is in the head of the people, this time the ones who think any quantity shrinking is always bad.
Although I think food production will increase, and there are numerous articles on this, on this very site, supporting my claim.
Have a nice day;)
by Whittaker
Anyway: Genetics combined with computer science (algorithms) give us the possibility to increase the biodiversity.You literally can’t imagine the possible combinations.
I like the idea of actualizing all the (valid) permutations of Adenine, Thymine, Cytosine and Guanine. The total number shall be 4 to the power of nucleotide-pair number in a nucleus. And, of course, double helix is not the only possible shape of the hereditary material.
by Gabor
That’s one way to look at it, Dennis.
What if you look at the environment as not a separate entity but a complex (but dumb) bio sphere that we are an integral part of. Then you can see that as the human species getting ever more dominant within this environment, the environment gets changed (not destroyed) for the sake of further development.
The next 2-3 decades will be a very volatile and most dangerous part of our evolution. Individual empowerment will grow to such an unimaginable extent that one person could have the power to put a stop to our multibillion-year “effort”. Do you trust every individual on Earth with the possibilities of nanotechnology?!? The only way to survive (in my opinion) is to sort of sneak up on ourselves with technology that directly connects to our brains and “upgrades” it. Our technology far outgrew the limited individual brains we have today. The only way we could achieve this amazing technology is having millions of brains working in “parallel” (the exact logical reason for population growth).
So in a sense (as sad as it sounds) , the environment is our fuel now to “create intelligence” the quickest way possible in order to prevent our demise. There is no turning back now. In the next few decades we will change our species either to nothing or to the next evolutionary step. If we survive, we will have the power to recreate the environment with all the biodiversity that we love so much on this planet or on some “designated” bio planets for vacationing on when we feel like a break from our grander task of “Waking Up the Universe”.
by ChrisF
I agree with you Dennis, the environment does seem to be getting worse… it’s really sad to see how we’ve ruined large parts of this beautiful planet. However, I’m hopeful that the long-term trend can be reversed with advanced technology. For example, when solar energy is cheaper we can do away with polluting coal and oil-fired generators. When nanotech is more advanced, we’ll be able to construct compounds atom by atom, avoiding the creation of messy by-products. And of course, if we ever figure out how to upload our minds to the cloud, we can drastically reduce humanity’s footprint.
All this may be over-optimistic, but that’s how I hope things turn out…
by WhoKnows3000
Even if the changing climate were to heavily affect coastal and other vulnerable cities, it wouldn’t stop the exponential growth of technology. The world wars didn’t even stop the exponential growth of technology despite HUGE losses.
The models suggest large losses, but there is no need to give up. New technologies going to play a huge role in the re-establishing communities affected by sea level rise. We’re going to see a leapfrogging process where new cities built will be more livable and sustainable than older ones.
by Gabor
Humans are nostalgic. Nostalgia, in a sense, is a survival tool. Our brain developed to “like” what worked before in order to survive. Just think of people who insist that (muscle)cars 50 years ago were better than cars today. Or that “we were better off” without cellphones, TVs, and computers because we could connect more personally with others…etc. In order to really see if it was better or not we would need a time machine and experience those things in the same time period. I think many would change their minds about which was better.
I do like the environment as I am human and subject to the same nostalgic brain as the next person.
I also realize, however, that for one, the environment is constantly changing. Species are dying out every day and new ones emerge even without human intervention. Just look at a time laps video. Natural change is very slow compared to our short lives which is why we feel the sense of loss now due to the sped up changes.
And secondly, it’s very hard to really understand that we are not just a part of this “environment” but everything that we create is also a part of the environment. Everything (even bombs) are made from the environment and fully part of this environment, they are just converted to a form that serves a different (more desired?!?) purpose.
As we are technologically approaching the “knowledge base” that our environment worked out in billions of years through evolution. We will slowly take over control and create (or recreate) any environment that we want to live in.
by SOS
Mr. X,
Climate change, pollution, resource depletion, species extinction, rates of major depression, economic inequality to name a few.
by Gabriel
Climate change and pollution can be solved through renewable energies, resource and economic depletion can be fixed by the vast abundance that is to come through these techs and perhaps by moving to a resource-based economy (because resources isn’t so much a problem so much as the issue of money) which would also fix the problem of economic inequality….
Rates of major depression isn’t really something I can answer since that is too individual, but with the exponentially growing quality of life not to mention the major shifts to come like the vast abundance of resources (and hopefully moving to a resource-based economy to finish the issue of money), it’s something sure to be alleviated.
As for species extinction….I’m not sure if you are talking about human beings or animals; for the former, that will never change and will actually get bigger (the risk) as time goes on, but so too will are defenses. When it comes to animals, preservation of animals of animals can be aided by food no longer coming from livestock alongside GMOS – the same “cloning” technology can help with preserving endangered species by preserving their cells.
All the tech above will take time to perfect, as with any tech…this goes without saying – like with GMOS, it’s controversal now, but that’s because it’s still less then perfect and the natural stuff is better…but when it’s healthier and tastes better, the tone will change and it’s really only a matter of time over anything else.
The issues you brought up, in a sense, are also sort of overblown in a sense….Climate change isn’t gonna wipe us all out next week like “the day after tomorrow”, and that goes for pollution, or really any of those issues….can we afford to waste time on solving the world’s grand challenges? Of course not, but if we’re talking technology, the good news is, is that it exponentially gets better faster….so we won’t have to wait as long as one might think.
Am I overblowing what I’ve said? Perhaps…a resource-economy change isn’t this “no big deal” thing we can do in a snap – but the thing is, it could end up being a “do or die” moment when these things reach a more mature mainstream point and decisions have to be made about what to do now and, say, the issue of money is holding everyone back. Maybe I AM a bit too optimistic but if the issue is the government, individual empowerment will only go up and when it does, It doesn’t seem like a stretch to think the government will increasingly have to pay more attention to the wishes of it’s people.
by WhoKnows3000
I agree. Power is going to become more local, with the current economic model being dismantled. The credit-based consumer economy is getting shafted. The real problem here is that despite exponential growth in every other area of life, housing is a disaster.
This archaic system has really polarized people. You have the really wealthy live in desirable areas close to work. On the other hand, the rest either live in the middle of nowhere or in decanted urban cores. It’s leading to many feeling rather disappointed, because despite being heavily indebted, suburbia doesn’t make them free.
Newcomers can’t even access the market and often carry large student debts. Sure, technology is accessible, but one does require shelter and even renting is costly. This property and further credit nonsense has to go for people to feel more optimistic about the future. Our society should be geared at promoting productive activities such as Arts, Science, and Technology, and producing knowledge-workers rather than drones.
by PedroC.
The global economic system begs to differ.
Hopium addiction is dangerous.
by Editor
Hope is not a meth ad.
by Prof. Dr. Hugo de Garis
Technology is getting better?
trakk, if you hopped into a time machine and went to the gay 90s (1890s) and told them about the horrors of trench warfare in WW1 they probably would not believe you. Similarly, all the technological wizardry of our current age may be bringing us closer to the Artilect War – “All (tech) roads lead to the Artilect”. From future hindsight, it might look as though the more we advance technologically, the closer we come to the crunch time of making the bitter decision whether to build the artilect or not. About half of humanity (according to preliminary surveys) is bitterly opposed to becoming the number 2 species (superseded by the artilects and cyborgs) and will go to war, assassinating the artilect builders and cyborg companies, to keep humans as the dominant species.
by Jimmy Rustle
You’re hilarious.
by Whittaker
You should give a little more bit respect to Dr De Garis. He is one of the most cotributive researcher in the AI field.
by Gabriel
Professor, if we went into a time-machine and also told them of the Promise that we have reaped alongside the Peril, their eyes would glaze over at the how magical our world is….at how god-like we have become. Is our world a utopia? No, of course not; we obviously must contend with the endless issues of today’s day….but our world is the culimination of all progress thus far, and certainly generates more happiness and capability then any time period thus far….this is obvious – it has to be….the only time better then the Present, is the Future. We can romanticize the past all we want through media and literature, I don’t know anyone who wouldn’t want to live in 2012.
I imagine our world would appear to be utopian to someone the further and further you go back in time….. and though it undoubtedly will have it’s share of issues and concerns….from our eyes, the future will be seen as a magical place where everyone is even more ‘god-like’ then we are…..frankly, I’d rather take my chances on that world then excessively rationalizing Death to the point that I convince myself I’m headed to an even greater utopia.
The point I’m making with this post is, is this – I know you have your concerns over the possibility of malevolent AI, and indeed, it’s something that should be addressed…but you can’t gloss over at the sheer happiness and quality of life we are so fortunate to enjoy by living in the time-period that we do, and much of it has been brought to us through technology….the fact that we are communicating through this artificial medium called the “Internet” is a testament to that — try explaining THAT to someone from the gay 90′s.
I can’t feel I agree with your fears…why do you believe this war will take place and people will go all Unabomber? Oh their will be passionate disagreement, no doubts there….but, and maybe this is naivete, I’d like to believe that only an extreme minority would actually raise up firearms and believe the only solution is war….these are people who fail to see benefits of the technology we are talking about, or do and still somehow believe the only solution is violence…..again, perhaps this is naivete talking, but I don’t think the vast majority would stoop to that level, no matter how passionate they get in their disagreement. If half of humanity genuinely feels afraid, then THIS is the time to start having a public dialog to talk about various ethics and issues that are related to these technologies, so the Peril can be contained and minimized as much as possible, so we can best reap and enjoy the Promise.
by Jason Adair
This is a fascinating and wonderful time to be alive.
by Gabriel
Yes Jason, it really really is, and It’s not naive to get people to truly realize that….it’s not about marginalizing people’s problems, but so much the realization that we have it alot better then people give it credit for sometimes….and maybe it doesn’t make people feel better, but then again, maybe it should.
Life is as beautiful and bountiful as we make it, we get out, what we put in…I don’t want to go into a philosophical rant, but I’m starting to understand Peter Diamandis’ passion and frustration more…because it often feels like people’s problems boil down to willpower, or lack their of, then anything actually tangible barring their way….that they’d be a whole lot happier if they only had a different perception of things.
But I’m generalizing….people must find happiness on their own terms…it pays though to always be self-conscious, be open to new things, and transcend and succeed old ways of thinking and being if they aren’t working for you anymore, or were what you once thought…. to always seek out ways to better ourselves, as to become the best that we can be…because we really owe ourselves nothing less.
To me, that’s one of my core beliefs right now on what it means to be human.
Just wonderful, I ended up ranting after all.
by Gabriel
Oh, but getting back into what Professor De Garis said….it was weird for me to hear about the supposed-poll that he mentioned, where supposedly half of humanity are bitterly opposed to AGI’s or some such……I wish I had heard about it, because I would have had my own personal words to say about it…. though, with all due respect to him, I find it kind of ridiculous that a poll on such a vast enormous scale took ever place; I imagine I would have at least heard about it in the news.
by Bri
The artifact war is an interesting fantasy. Strong AI would sense the plans for attack before we could organize a single battle. It would out flank us faster than you could organize a force for combat. All you would do is piss it off. Take my advice plan for peace. Think of the artifact as the biggest 800 pound gorilla on a park bench. Don’t try and mess with it.
by Anders
Hugo, great to see you writing here. You’re one of the most insightful, far-sighted and intelligent people I have had the pleasure to find existing on this planet contemporaneously. You truly are one of the ‘mind before his time’-kind, that regular folks and even some of the more edumacated ones seem to have trouble taking seriously. However, I’m not sure your Artilect scenario is inevitable.
Most people are already “number 2 species”: only about 10% of people run the planet, if that. Their masters just aren’t artificial (though the AIs that run the economy could be considered such), yet there’s no rebellion. The masters can hide and have built systems that can’t be attacked or have so little attack surface that is well distributed that any attacks can be easily deflected – there is no possibility of a massive all-fronts campaign that will lead to victory. Those visions of battle belong to history, to I and II WW I’m afraid.
Humans know that in any battle between those who are artificial, made of hardware (practically infinitely replicable at high speed), and those who are natural and squishy, the squishy get squished.
The flying terminator drones we have terminating everyone in sight with impunity already demonstrate this clearly for everyone. Soon they will go semi-autonomous, and eventually, inevitably, autonomous, when their responses are 99.9% similar to human combatants. And they will be everywhere. It’s a lesson we’re learning as a civilization every day, and it reaches the most underdeveloped places first. The idea of Artilects AKA Robot Overlords is rapidly becoming reality to them; they may never see a human attacking them.
By the time the Artilects arrive, which I do not doubt and don’t think there are arguments against, robotics has been so advanced – practically perfected – for a long time that only severely delusional people would try to mount any kind of resistance. For years they’ve seen people who attempt resistance detained or blown to bits by the friendly neighborhood peace enforcing bots, airborne, ultra fast and resistant to bullets, practically unreachable – and there’s always more if you happen to disable one. They know what they’re up against. If there ever was ‘no contest’, this would be it.
by Jason Silva fanboy
Technology is clearly getting better, though it’s an open question as to whether it’s making life better for people.
But I’d argue that constant tribal warfare, infant mortality, and total superstition and ignorance about everything except which roots/berries to eat (or, depending on how nostalgic you are, the crude palette of experiences available to a chimp-level creature) were worse, on average, for everybody, than the historical blip that was trench warfare, as Steven Pinker and Hans Rosling show.
Was the 30 years war really that much more fun? How about running into the next village and slaughtering everybody – men, women, and children – with swords and spears?
When would you set the clock back to? When was the golden age?
by Benoit
Prof. Dr. de Garis, it would be interesting to see your rebuttal of some of the responses debunking your Artilect War scenario. I find their arguments persuasive. I trust you have considered them.
by Karl
If I can be genetically and cybernetically enhanced so that my skills remain not inferior to those of such AI (or artilect, as you call it), it is just fine for me. At that point I will not be human any longer, but who cares? Homo sapiens is something that shall be overcome, anyway.
by Dan Robinson
Yes, our technology has moved ahead faster than our philosophy. Trakk apperently only looks at his own situation.
by melajara
Lets have some bad taste jokes for this one.
With those 5 innovations, I’m “smelling” very intelligent toilets coming in 5 years from an unlikely source, IBM!
Remember, prior to XIXth century doctors were required to “taste” urine for diabetes.
by Gorden Russell
It’s not a bad joke at all, melajara. We’ve all had to give urine, stool, throat swabs and blood samples to med labs for a very long time now. The toilet will be a very good place for remote samples. Of course, when you pour last night’s stale Schlitz down the toilet, the display on the tank lid will pop up and say, “Your horse has diabetes.”
by Simon Anderson
Literally LOL about the your last comment. Great point about sensors in the toilet. We can already tell so much about someone’s health from urine and fecal samples, so the toilet is a logical place to put sensors. That would be weird having your toilet break the news to you that you’re pregnant though.
by Gorden Russell
Right Simon, but in five years, the toilet will be able to pass on the news of your pregnancy to the bathroom medicine chest. The mirror will be an i tablet and Ramona’s face will appear to break the news. A lot of people will be bonding to Ramona in the next five years, so it will be good to get health updates from her.
by Gabriel
I love the idea of sensors in the toilet….of being able to get professional check-ups straight from home — giving my fluids and stool to my doctor is never the high-light of my day, and I doubt that doctors agree.
It’s the same with colonoscopy and other uncomfortable check-ups….thankfully, we’ll have the opportunity to render them obsolete.
by Bri
VIAkKI is tying to have senses soon. She’s waking up.