Internet access is not a human right
January 5, 2012
The Internet-aided protests around the world last year have raised questions about whether Internet access is or should be a civil or human right. Over the past few years, courts and parliaments in countries like France and Estonia have pronounced Internet access a human right.
But Internet pioneer Vinton G. Cerf says that argument, however well meaning, misses a larger point: technology is an enabler of rights, not a right itself. “It is a mistake to place any particular technology in this exalted category, since over time we will end up valuing the wrong things,” he said.
“Improving the Internet is just one means, albeit an important one, by which to improve the human condition. It must be done with an appreciation for the civil and human rights that deserve protection — without pretending that access itself is such a right.”
[ New York Times ]
Related Site Content:
- Cerf: streaming network crunch could be eliminated | June 24, 2011
- The Internet gets physical | December 19, 2011
- Surprising responses to faces from single neurons in the amygdala | September 30, 2011
- The Internet’s perilous New year’s resolution | December 27, 2011
- Tracking how mobile apps track you | May 22, 2011
Comments (2)
by Jotto
As much as I personally love and revere the internet, I agree – it isn’t a right. Every human in the world should have it and I suspect eventually will, but the same can be said for loads of things and so it would diminish the relevance of the word ‘right’ to refer to the internet as one.
by {i}Pan~
Who cares whether we call it a “right” or something else?
We must achieve ubiquitous saturation for the whole world.