<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landscape House by Universe Architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/landscape-house-by-universe-architecture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/landscape-house-by-universe-architecture</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GatorALLin</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/landscape-house-by-universe-architecture/comment-page-1#comment-91432</link>
		<dc:creator>GatorALLin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=177423#comment-91432</guid>
		<description>I would love to see more examples....  and I would argue, just because it looks cool or unique does not make it a better living structure or design. I would also argue that you need to live (not just design up in software, etc) in this structure to have a chance to know what was good/bad about it. So many great ideas start on a napkin or in a computer, but the real design work in many cases has to be done by living in it and or using the thing you make. There is a special place in hell where designers go and forced to use products they made, but never had to use.... (just saying that to most of the people who make up instruction guides to assemble that cheap furniture we have all purchased at one time, but who never had to put one together before).  /rant over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see more examples&#8230;.  and I would argue, just because it looks cool or unique does not make it a better living structure or design. I would also argue that you need to live (not just design up in software, etc) in this structure to have a chance to know what was good/bad about it. So many great ideas start on a napkin or in a computer, but the real design work in many cases has to be done by living in it and or using the thing you make. There is a special place in hell where designers go and forced to use products they made, but never had to use&#8230;. (just saying that to most of the people who make up instruction guides to assemble that cheap furniture we have all purchased at one time, but who never had to put one together before).  /rant over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bri</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/landscape-house-by-universe-architecture/comment-page-1#comment-90619</link>
		<dc:creator>Bri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=177423#comment-90619</guid>
		<description>When seeing something like this it really makes you appreciate Frank Loyd Wright. He strove for the same ideal and was very successful at realizing it. This structure looks pretty useless as a house. I think the ides has merit. They need to incorporate reel living space. This looks more like an airport causeway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When seeing something like this it really makes you appreciate Frank Loyd Wright. He strove for the same ideal and was very successful at realizing it. This structure looks pretty useless as a house. I think the ides has merit. They need to incorporate reel living space. This looks more like an airport causeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
