<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living Tomorrow &#124; House of the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leomorg</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-13237</link>
		<dc:creator>leomorg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-13237</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not a party pooper. This thing was created a few years back and is backed by a load of big corporations and appears, by the look of this clip, to be a giant commercial for shiny gadgets and vertically integrated services (what Bruce Sterling called &quot;stacks&quot; in his SXSW2012 closing talk (http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP992407) ) and steers clear of the relevant features of energy efficiency/alternative energies (climate change), the needs of the not-so-rich and developing parts of society and the world and last but not least the coming biotech-revolution. And there is this interesting bit about Philip Morris using the predecessor of the current exhibition as a promotional tool (http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/13/4/375.full).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not a party pooper. This thing was created a few years back and is backed by a load of big corporations and appears, by the look of this clip, to be a giant commercial for shiny gadgets and vertically integrated services (what Bruce Sterling called &#8220;stacks&#8221; in his SXSW2012 closing talk (<a href="http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP992407" rel="nofollow">http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP992407</a>) ) and steers clear of the relevant features of energy efficiency/alternative energies (climate change), the needs of the not-so-rich and developing parts of society and the world and last but not least the coming biotech-revolution. And there is this interesting bit about Philip Morris using the predecessor of the current exhibition as a promotional tool (<a href="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/13/4/375.full" rel="nofollow">http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/13/4/375.full</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasReitsma</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-6192</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasReitsma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-6192</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t want to be a party pooper but I think this is rather silly. I&#039;ve hardly seen anything impressive, nothing money can&#039;t already buy.. Again it&#039;s all about commercial interest and little about innovation or rigorous change. Just as &quot;ilo123&quot; I&#039;m wondering why they&#039;re calling it environmentally friendly. Not to say a futuristic house can&#039;t have high energy consumption gadgets but I would expect the house at least for the most part to power itself by clever green technologies. I&#039;m a little disappointed but this nevertheless proves Ray&#039;s statement about the intuative linear view most people have, who try to predict the future. Frankly, I would be very surprised if the real houses in the future, five years from now (especially with that pricetag !!) will be so ehm 2011ish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t want to be a party pooper but I think this is rather silly. I&#8217;ve hardly seen anything impressive, nothing money can&#8217;t already buy.. Again it&#8217;s all about commercial interest and little about innovation or rigorous change. Just as &#8220;ilo123&#8243; I&#8217;m wondering why they&#8217;re calling it environmentally friendly. Not to say a futuristic house can&#8217;t have high energy consumption gadgets but I would expect the house at least for the most part to power itself by clever green technologies. I&#8217;m a little disappointed but this nevertheless proves Ray&#8217;s statement about the intuative linear view most people have, who try to predict the future. Frankly, I would be very surprised if the real houses in the future, five years from now (especially with that pricetag !!) will be so ehm 2011ish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilo123</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-5834</link>
		<dc:creator>ilo123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-5834</guid>
		<description>Frankly. I do not like this house. Why do you call it “environmentally friendly” having lots of electronic gadgets without real necessity and eating up energy? Where is nature or, at last, it’s imitation – grass, trees, flowers, water? I will imagine a future house rather a log cabin type with MINIMUM of gadgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly. I do not like this house. Why do you call it “environmentally friendly” having lots of electronic gadgets without real necessity and eating up energy? Where is nature or, at last, it’s imitation – grass, trees, flowers, water? I will imagine a future house rather a log cabin type with MINIMUM of gadgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djsutton</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-5566</link>
		<dc:creator>djsutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 23:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-5566</guid>
		<description>I would like a house that cleaned itself!  How about gadgets that really do remove dust particles  from the air, glass and tile that vaporized dirt and scum, an automatic dog ( child) washer, whole body warm air dryers to eliminate bath towels, vacuum systems that work by themselves- stuff like that.  I can remember my grocery list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like a house that cleaned itself!  How about gadgets that really do remove dust particles  from the air, glass and tile that vaporized dirt and scum, an automatic dog ( child) washer, whole body warm air dryers to eliminate bath towels, vacuum systems that work by themselves- stuff like that.  I can remember my grocery list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobinSongs</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-5536</link>
		<dc:creator>RobinSongs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-5536</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t a virtual house a little better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a virtual house a little better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirhotalot</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/living-tomorrow-house-of-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-5517</link>
		<dc:creator>sirhotalot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=132795#comment-5517</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see a more practical version of this in an average house and apartment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see a more practical version of this in an average house and apartment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
