Many billions of rocky planets in the habitable zones around red dwarfs in the Milky Way
March 29, 2012

This artist's impression shows a sunset seen from the super-Earth Gliese 667 Cc. The brightest star in the sky is the red dwarf Gliese 667 C, which is part of a triple star system. The other two more distant stars, Gliese 667 A and B appear in the sky also to the right. Astronomers have estimated that there are tens of billions of such rocky worlds orbiting faint red dwarf stars in the Milky Way alone. (Credit: ESO/L. Calçada)
There are tens of billions of these light planets around red dwarf stars in our galaxy alone, it has just been announced by an international team using observations with the HARPS spectrograph on the 3.6-meter telescope at ESO‘s La Silla Observatory in Chile [1].
A recent announcement [link], showing that planets are ubiquitous in our galaxy used a different method that was not sensitive to this important class of exoplanets.
The HARPS team has been searching for exoplanets orbiting the most common kind of star in the Milky Way — red dwarf stars (also known as M dwarfs [2]). These stars are faint and cool compared to the Sun, but very common and long-lived, and therefore account for 80% of all the stars in the Milky Way.
“Our new observations with HARPS mean that about 40% of all red dwarf stars have a super-Earth orbiting in the habitable zone where liquid water can exist on the surface of the planet,” says Xavier Bonfils (IPAG, Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Grenoble, France), the leader of the team. “Because red dwarfs are so common — there are about 160 billion of them in the Milky Way — this leads us to the astonishing result that there are tens of billions of these planets in our galaxy alone.”
The HARPS team surveyed a carefully chosen sample of 102 red dwarf stars in the southern skies over a six-year period. A total of nine super-Earths (planets with masses between one and ten times that of Earth) were found, including two inside the habitable zones of Gliese 581 [link] and Gliese 667 C respectively. The astronomers could estimate how heavy the planets were and how far from their stars they orbited.
By combining all the data, including observations of stars that did not have planets, and looking at the fraction of existing planets that could be discovered, the team has been able to work out how common different sorts of planets are around red dwarfs. They find that the frequency of occurrence of super-Earths [3] in the habitable zone is 41% with a range from 28% to 95%.
On the other hand, more massive planets, similar to Jupiter and Saturn in our Solar System, are found to be rare around red dwarfs. Less than 12% of red dwarfs are expected to have giant planets (with masses between 100 and 1000 times that of the Earth).
As there are many red dwarf stars close to the Sun the new estimate means that there are probably about one hundred super-Earth planets in the habitable zones around stars in the neighbourhood of the Sun at distances less than about 30 light-years [4].
“The habitable zone around a red dwarf, where the temperature is suitable for liquid water to exist on the surface, is much closer to the star than the Earth is to the Sun,” says Stephane Udry (Geneva Observatory and member of the team). “But red dwarfs are known to be subject to stellar eruptions or flares, which may bathe the planet in X-rays or ultraviolet radiation, and which may make life there less likely.”
One of the planets discovered in the HARPS survey of red dwarfs is Gliese 667 Cc [5]. This is the second planet in this triple star system [link] and seems to be situated close to the centre of the habitable zone. Although this planet is more than four times heavier than the Earth it is the closest twin to Earth found so far and almost certainly has the right conditions for the existence of liquid water on its surface. This is the second super-Earth planet inside the habitable zone of a red dwarf discovered during this HARPS survey, after Gliese 581d was announced in 2007 and confirmed in 2009.
“Now that we know that there are many super-Earths around nearby red dwarfs we need to identify more of them using both HARPS and future instruments. Some of these planets are expected to pass in front of their parent star as they orbit — this will open up the exciting possibility of studying the planet’s atmosphere and searching for signs of life,” concludes Xavier Delfosse, another member of the team [link].
Notes
[1] HARPS measures the radial velocity of a star with extraordinary precision. A planet in orbit around a star causes the star to regularly move towards and away from a distant observer on Earth. Due to the Doppler effect, this radial velocity change induces a shift of the star’s spectrum towards longer wavelengths as it moves away (called a redshift) and a blueshift (towards shorter wavelengths) as it approaches. This tiny shift of the star’s spectrum can be measured with a high-precision spectrograph such as HARPS and used to infer the presence of a planet.
[2] These stars are called M dwarfs because they have the spectral class M. This is the coolest of the seven classes in the simplest scheme for classifying stars accordingly to decreasing temperature and the appearance of their spectra.
[3] Planets with a mass between one and ten times that of the Earth are called super-Earths. There are no such planets in our Solar System, but they appear to be very common around other stars. Discoveries of such planets in the habitable zones around their stars are very exciting because — if the planet were rocky and had water, like Earth — they could potentially be an abode of life.
[4] The astronomers used ten parsecs as their definition of “close”. This corresponds to about 32.6 light-years.
[5] The name means that the planet is the second discovered (c) orbiting the third component (C) of the triple star system called Gliese 667. The bright stellar companions Gliese 667 A and B would be prominent in the skies of Gliese 667 Cc. The discovery of Gliese 667 Cc was independently announced by Guillem Anglada-Escude and colleagues in February 2012, roughly two months after the electronic preprint of the Bonfils et al. paper went online. This confirmation of the planets Gliese 667 Cb and Cc by Anglada-Escude and collaborators was largely based on HARPS observations and data processing of the European team that were made publicly available through the ESO archive.
Ref.: Bonfils et al., The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets ⋆,⋆⋆XXVI. Two giant planets around M0 dwarfs, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2012; (in press)
Comments (9)
by Sean Brazell
And so, if the odds weren’t ALREADY completely overwhelming that alien intelligent life exists in our galaxy, these new figures are completely overwhelming. The question is no long “Are we alone in the universe?”, but rather “Why are they not talking to us?”
I find this new question far more disturbing than the old one.
by Aezel
It is interesting that Jupiter protected Earth from probably more than a couple mass extinction events. Seeing as how most of these planetary systems around red dwarfs lack gas giants, it may be that these planets are constantly “hammered back into the stone age” so to speak.
by Editor
Yes, good point. Our future?
by Atmic
@Mortran
This is the first time I’ve heard that paradox explained, but it doesn’t seem like a very strong one to me. By the paradox’s own logic, who’s to say Von-Neumann devices didn’t already arrive undetected, got their information and left? Who’s to say that civilizations don’t exist which are more advanced, but chose not to create probes at all, for their own reasons?
If it’s Nanotech (and it’s not some mass of gray goo), then I see no reason why anyone would take notice of it, since it’s not like we have a constant scan of everything that is within our planet down to the nano-level at all times. All I’m saying is I don’t like the paradox — it just doesn’t hold any weight for me, personally.
by Chris
Mortran, it may be that as civilizations advance they go ‘in’ rather than ‘out’. This theory is described in massive detail on the internet somewhere.
by Mortran
Considering how many planets suitable for life are out there, it is surprising that we haven’t seen any evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence so far. Any civilization little more advanced than ours could build self-replicating von-Neumann-probes that would be able to visit every planet in the galaxy within less than 50 million years. Compared to the age of the universe (13.7 billion years), 50 million years is insignificant.
So obviously there hasn’t been a single extra-terrestrial civilization in the whole galaxy that ever surpassed our level, or their von-Neumann probes would have arrived here long ago. (so called Fermi paradox)
So what is wrong? Why is there no other intelligent life in the galaxy? Why are we alone? There is something very strange going on in the universe.
by Spikosauropod
Life may not be as probable as we suppose, and intelligent life may be extremely rare. Who knows, maybe life occurs only, on average, once per trillion iterations of the universe.
There is another possibility that I find more compelling. Maybe, at the point where civilizations can build a von Neumann machine, they enter a Technological Singularity and are off to better things. Maybe they discover that what we call the universe is just a small corner of what is available. I recommend a book called The Number of the Beast, by Robert Heinlein.
by Nicolas
At the risk of engaging in excessive anthropomorphism, we might speculate that, much like human biologists studying ants, chimps or dolphins, ET biologists would not want to make their presence known. I mean, would a biologist studying gorillas go in their midst armed with a 9 millimeter pistol, so as to let them know he’s the toughest s.o.b. on the block? Of course not! If ET is like other scientists, he will observe us from afar.
by gaoptimize
Red centered spectrum not the best to support photosynthesis as we know it. Let’s hope life finds a way.