Molecular code for destroying/correcting defective RNA cracked
August 21, 2012

A molecular model of a PPR protein recognizing a specific RNA molecule. The identity of specific amino acid residues in the protein (colored sticks) determines the sequence of the RNA molecule it can bind. (Image credit: Charlie Bond)
University of Western Australia (UWA) scientists have cracked a molecular code that may open the way to destroying or correcting defective gene products, such as those that cause genetic disorders in humans.
The code determines the recognition of RNA molecules by a superfamily of RNA-binding proteins called pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins.
(When a gene is switched on, it is copied into RNA. This RNA is then used to make proteins that are required by the organism for all of its vital functions. If a gene is defective, its RNA copy and the proteins made from this will also be defective. This forms the basis of many terrible genetic disorders in humans.)
Revolutionizing disease treatment
RNA-binding PPR proteins could revolutionize the way we treat disease. Their secret is their versatility — they can find and bind a specific RNA molecule, and have the capacity to correct it if it is defective, or destroy it if it is detrimental. They can also help ramp up production of proteins required for growth and development.
The new paper in PLOS Genetics describes for the first time how PPR proteins recognize their RNA targets via an easy-to-understand code. This mechanism mimics the simplicity and predictability of pairing between DNA strands, but at a protein/RNA interface.

This RNA extractions image shows a pipette being used in an RNA experiment. These instruments are capable of accurately delivering one millionth of a liter of liquid – which is essential when you are working with the molecules of the cell. (Credit: University of Western Australia)
“Many PPR proteins are vitally important, but we don’t know what they do. Now we’ve cracked the code, we can find out,” said Australian ARC Centre for Excellence in Plant Energy Biology Director Ian Small.
“What’s more, we can now design our own synthetic proteins to target any RNA sequence we choose. This should allow us to control the expression of genes in new ways that just weren’t available before. The potential is really exciting.”
“This discovery was made in plants, but is applicable across many species as PPR proteins are found in humans and animals too,” says Professor Bond.
The breakthrough comes from an international, interdisciplinary research team including UWA researchers Professor Ian Small and Aaron Yap from the ARC Centre for Excellence in Plant Energy Biology and Professor Charlie Bond and Yee Seng Chong from UWA’s School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, along with Professor Alice Barkan’s team at the University of Oregon.
The research was publicly funded by the the ARC Centre for Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, the WA State Government in Australia, and the NSF in the U.S.
Comments (8)
by Dan Robinson
So now they can make us all perfect, so we won’t need evolution any longer?
by Bri
If anything we are going to evolve that much faster. Want to swim with dolphins? Why not. Live in weightlessness? Why not. We will change ourselves in inumerable ways. Not everyone is going to want what you might want. What took millions of years could happen overnight. Not everyone is going to want to be blond haired and blue eyed, not by a long shot. Let’s go for purple too.
by Conrad Green
i have klein felters syndrome. so if they can help much appreciated
by Vin
Determine RNA profile set.
Optimise.
Synthesize complimentary PPR profile set.
Apply.
Monitor.
Reiterate as required.
= immortality?
by melajara
It is true that biology, especially genetics is more and more an IT science, a point of view encompassed now by Systems biology (cf http://www.bluesci.org/?p=7542).
When one is devising a computer program mapping an input to an output, there are usually several articulation points (to take a [call]graph analogy, say nodes representing function calls with high connectivity in the execution space of the program) for a possible intervention to modify the I/O relationship under analysis.
Considering DNA to phenotype as a particular I/O instantiation and “control flow”, it is time now to devise a coherent map of the currently known articulation points for better control or “correction” of this mapping.
This article is demonstrating yet another critical articulation point for possible leveraging, this time at the transcriptome juncture.
Fascinating stuff!
by Mrs. Jo Dermody
If they need a gunia pig to experiment on I volunteer.
I have Sjogrens and it has made my last 20 years of life
a living hell. I am told it is genetic. So here I am, let them
contact me.
mjdred@aol.com
by Bob Vasquez
Could this lead some day to “correcting” autism?
by gaoptimize
This significance of this breakthrough will be come apparent soon enough. Kudos and much wealth to the researchers (if anything is patentable).