Nanomagnets may replace silicon-based transistors in computers, say UC Berkeley researchers
November 20, 2013

As the current passes through a strip of tantalum, electrons with opposite spins separate. This “clocking” helps in orienting nanomagnets (on the top of the tantalum strip) so that they can be switched easily. (Credit: Debanjan Bhowmik/UC Berkeley)
New work by University of California Berkeley researchers could one day make nanomagnetic switches a viable replacement for the conventional power-consuming transistors found in all computers.
“Increased energy consumption of modern day computers is a major challenge that the computer industry faces,” researcher Debanjan Bhowmik explained to KurzweilAI. Bhowmik is a UC Berkeley graduate student in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences and the first author of a paper on this finding in Nature Nanotechnology.
“The faster the computers are, the hotter they get. This is because of a fundamental physical limit to the switching energy of a transistor, a semiconductor-based switch, which is at the heart of a computer. Nanomagnetic logic uses magnets as an ultra low energy alternative to transistors for computing because of their much sharper switching behavior.
“We project that our innovation, when implemented in the same scale as that of modern CMOS [used in transistors], would consume 10 times lower power.”
Nanomagnetic computing
For more than a decade, researchers have been pursuing magnets as an alternative to transistors because they require far less energy needs when switching. However, until now, the power needed to generate the magnetic field to orient the magnets so they can easily clock on and off has negated much of the energy savings that would have been gained by moving away from transistors.
UC Berkeley researchers overcame this limitation by exploiting the special properties of the rare heavy metal tantalum. They created a “Spin Hall effect” by using nanomagnets placed on top of tantalum wire and then sending a current through the metal. Electrons in the current will randomly spin in either a clockwise or counterclockwise direction. When the current is sent through tantalum’s atomic core, the metal’s physical properties naturally sort the electrons to opposing sides based on their direction of spin. This creates the polarization researchers exploited to switch magnets in a logic circuit without the need for a magnetic field.
“This is a breakthrough in the push for low-powered computing,” said study principal investigator Sayeef Salahuddin, UC Berkeley assistant professor of electrical engineering and computer sciences. “The power consumption we are seeing is up to 10,000 times lower than state-of-the-art schemes for nanomagnetic computing. Our experiments are the proof of concept that magnets could one day be a realistic replacement for transistors.”
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Semiconductor Research Corp. and the National Science Foundation helped support this work.
Abstract of Nature Nanotechnology paper
Spin-based computing schemes could enable new functionalities beyond those of charge-based approaches. Examples include nanomagnetic logic, where information can be processed using dipole coupled nanomagnets, as demonstrated by multi-bit computing gates. One fundamental benefit of using magnets is the possibility of a significant reduction in the energy per bit compared with conventional transistors. However, so far, practical implementations of nanomagnetic logic have been limited by the necessity to apply a magnetic field for clocking. Although the energy associated with magnetic switching itself could be very small, the energy necessary to generate the magnetic field renders the overall logic scheme uncompetitive when compared with complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) counterparts. Here, we demonstrate a nanomagnetic logic scheme at room temperature where the necessity for using a magnetic field clock can be completely removed by using spin-orbit torques. We construct a chain of three perpendicularly polarized CoFeB nanomagnets on top of a tantalum wire and show that an unpolarized current flowing through the wire can ‘clock’ the perpendicular magnetization to a metastable state. An input magnet can then drive the nanomagnetic chain deterministically to one of two dipole-coupled states, ‘2 up 1 down’ or ‘2 down 1 up’, depending on its own polarization. Thus, information can flow along the chain, dictated by the input magnet and clocked solely by a charge current in tantalum, without any magnetic field. A three to four order of magnitude reduction in energy dissipation is expected for our scheme when compared with state-of-the-art nanomagnetic logic.
comments 13
by josdorpjossie
I don’t think replacing silicium with tantalium is a good idea. There already is a shortage of tantalium in the world.
by Daniel
I’d love to start seeing more articles without the phrase “could one day”. Do a search for this exact phrase on this site; it’s not just my perception.
It seems like there are far more cool things “on the horizon” than cool things actually becoming a reality, even years after hearing about them. Does the news just tend to be overblown? Are universities patenting these ideas and no companies want to touch them? Specific to the topic of computer technology – are Intel and AMD sticking too rigidly to a long term roadmap?
by Editor
A good place to explore re that interesting question about a long-term roadmap is … the long-term roadmap :) — http://www.itrs.net/Links/2012ITRS/Home2012.htm.
by beephatron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick-Tock
that’s more practical if you’re looking to buy a computer in the next few years. The 10nm process is the big stumbling block, when those ‘quantum tunneling’ effects we hear about now and then are a major, practical problem. Apparently Intel seems to think 2015, next gen technology will be ready to go into the factory. Next gen being all these exotic materials we’ve been hearing about, nanotubes, non-silicon semiconductors, etc etc. I’m skeptical.. but those guys are a lot smarter than I am.
by Lightning
In reply to: Daniel
Please be reminded that your statement generalizes the publisher of this find: “UC Berkeley,” as a simple university archetype in spite of the fact that it is ranked the number two College of Engineering in the United States.
It is not an archetype applicable to all “universities” as your comment relies on having the word in plural, therefore your comment is not logically sound nor does it provide a factual argument.
It is like moaning about MITs own developments and breakthroughs and saying “lul dese guis not get it done 0k.”
I’d love to start seeing more logic from you.
UCB works side-by-side with Intel on a number of things, even on the robotics field — such as the laundry-folding robot (“PR2″) that both are developing together in joint operation. If one develops one thing, they both cooperate in pertaining projects together.
by Jeevul
So, what type of performance upgrade would this bring? I know power consumption is important, but what type of scales are we seeing in terms of performance increases?
by Gorden Russell
I’ve read this as carefull as I can, but I still don’t understand.
“An input magnet can then drive the nanomagnetic chain deterministically to one of two dipole-coupled states…”
I spent a lot of time as a child playing with magnets. I never found a way to change the polarity of one magnet with another.
by Gorden Russell
But not to complain, if they get these new processors online in a few years, it’ll make the robot pink-slip apocalypse come that much sooner.
So when do you think they will go into production with these, Amara?
by Gorden Russell
But these new computers will also make Technocopianism arrive sooner too, so not to worry.
I wrote a fuller comment about this in the third article posted today, the one about printing computer displays and solar cells.
There’s a paper about Technocopianism here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12rvGiSLP-hwq1qn0GnhM4W-UJWGx2x5nVbTtEGPLvig/edit?pli=1
by beephatron
it seems that technocopianism will bring our society back to the colonial days, when people handled their own food production, made their own furniture out of wood, built their own houses, handled their own self-defense. It was a lot of hard work, but it built a nation with a lot of character, for sure.
During this depression, instead of breeding parasites, as hand-outs inevitably do.. we could provide ’10 acres and a mule’.. But the acres could be vertical, and the mule could be a 3d printer!
by beephatron
you can magnetize/demagnetize magnets by rubbing them together in a certain direction repeatedly, spin on electrons can be flipped too, with magnetic fields.
by Gorden Russell
Thanks, beephatron.
by alvaro
Enter spintronic computer