Nanoparticles loaded with bee venom kill HIV
March 11, 2013

Nanoparticles (purple) carrying melittin (green) fuse with HIV (small circles with spiked outer ring), destroying the virus’s protective envelope. Molecular bumpers (small red ovals) prevent the nanoparticles from harming the body’s normal cells, which are much larger in size. (Credit: Joshua L. Hood/Washington University in St. Louis)
Nanoparticles carrying a toxin found in bee venom can destroy human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) while leaving surrounding cells unharmed, researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have shown.
The finding is an important step toward developing a vaginal gel that may prevent the spread of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS.“Our hope is that in places where HIV is running rampant, people could use this gel as a preventive measure to stop the initial infection,” says Joshua L. Hood, MD, PhD, a research instructor in medicine.The study appears in the current issue of Antiviral Therapy.
Bee venom contains a potent toxin called melittin that can poke holes in the protective envelope that surrounds HIV, and other viruses. Large amounts of free melittin can cause a lot of damage, including killing tumor cells..
Protecting normal cells
The new study shows that melittin loaded onto these nanoparticles does not harm normal cells. That’s because Hood added protective bumpers to the nanoparticle surface. When the nanoparticles come into contact with normal cells, which are much larger in size, the particles simply bounce off. HIV, on the other hand, is even smaller than the nanoparticle, so HIV fits between the bumpers and makes contact with the surface of the nanoparticle, where the bee toxin awaits.
“Melittin on the nanoparticles fuses with the viral envelope,” Hood says. “The melittin forms little pore-like attack complexes and ruptures the envelope, stripping it off the virus.”
According to Hood, an advantage of this approach is that the nanoparticle attacks an essential part of the virus’ structure. In contrast, most anti-HIV drugs inhibit the virus’s ability to replicate. But this anti-replication strategy does nothing to stop initial infection, and some strains of the virus have found ways around these drugs and reproduce anyway.
“We are attacking an inherent physical property of HIV,” Hood says. “Theoretically, there isn’t any way for the virus to adapt to that. The virus has to have a protective coat, a double-layered membrane that covers the virus.”
Therapy for existing HIV infections
Beyond prevention in the form of a vaginal gel, Hood also sees potential for using nanoparticles with melittin as therapy for existing HIV infections, especially those that are drug-resistant. The nanoparticles could be injected intravenously and, in theory, would be able to clear HIV from the blood stream.
“The basic particle that we are using in these experiments was developed many years ago as an artificial blood product,” Hood says. “It didn’t work very well for delivering oxygen, but it circulates safely in the body and gives us a nice platform that we can adapt to fight different kinds of infections.”
Since melittin attacks double-layered membranes indiscriminately, this concept is not limited to HIV. Many viruses, including hepatitis B and C, rely on the same kind of protective envelope and would be vulnerable to melittin-loaded nanoparticles.
Birth control alternative
Hood says the gel easily could be adapted to target sperm as well as HIV. But in some cases people may only want the HIV protection.
“We also are looking at this for couples where only one of the partners has HIV, and they want to have a baby,” Hood says. “These particles by themselves are actually very safe for sperm, for the same reason they are safe for vaginal cells.”
While this work was done in cells in a laboratory environment, Hood and his colleagues say the nanoparticles are easy to manufacture in large enough quantities to supply them for future clinical trials.
This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges Explorations.
Comments (9)
by GatorALLin
Ouch that stings a bit…
…or….. you want to put what …on my what?
…trying to imagine some of the things said for using this gel…
by eldras
Its great incremental steps.
The leap will come when we do all experiments in simulations.
Short-term we may be able to create immunity to HIV by gene therapy
ie altering our genes.
The convergence of computing and other disciples will get machine labs built perhaps as softwares and copied worldwide overnight.
Crowd- sourced solutions – where anyone can contribute to research will become common when human machine interfactes are very easy and A.I. takes off at google:
Like you can just talk to your screen and say do a lob experiment set to cure XYZ and it delivers the answer.
China and the EU have joined the US in mega diverse projects.
by W.
See this movie (The Emperor’s New Virus):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Li9MO3RfCQ
Is it true that nobody has isolated HIV virus so far? Do you know about any scientific proof? So how you can kill the virus if there is no proof that it exists? I am confused.
by VovixLDR
In a few words, that video is a big piece of anti-scientific BS for conspirology-susceptible people.
by W.
Asking questions isn’t anti-scientific. Emotional opinions are. If you know scientific proof based on research that is unquestionable, please share it to clear any doubts.
by melajara
Another huge news (there is an avalanche of important results on nanoparticle based therapies reported on this site nowadays) and actually, in this case, the last line is maybe the most important,
“This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Grand Challenges Explorations”
Big pharmas would have killed this research or buried it or at the very least found a plausible reason to make it actually inapplicable, but not the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ;-)
by Rob Smura
Are you kidding me? I suppose you think that the car companies are “hiding” a car that runs on water too.
by melajara
Not the car companies but maybe the oil companies ;-)
by Sz4r1ej
Wake up Rob, reality is knocking on your doors.
Treating patients is immensely much more profitable than curing them.
Not the first time in history where population would be controlled by withholding information.