Nanoscale technologies to cut DNA sequencing costs
September 26, 2012

Grants of almost $19 million will help to develop technologies to dramatically reduce the cost of DNA sequencing, the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health, has announced.
During the past decade, DNA sequencing costs have fallen dramatically (see www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts), fueled by tools, technologies and process improvements developed by genomics researchers. In 2004, NHGRI launched the Advanced DNA Sequencing Technology Program to accelerate improvements in DNA sequencing technologies.
By 2009, the program had surpassed its initial goal of producing high-quality genome sequences of roughly 6 billion base pairs — the amount of DNA found in humans and other mammals that receive roughly 3 billion base pairs from each of their parents — for $100,000 each.
Today, the cost of sequencing a human genome using these next-generation DNA sequencing technologies has dipped to just under $8,000.
Price is one hurdle in the way of widespread use of genomics in research and clinical care. Speed and accuracy are among other factors. The grants will attempt to address all of these challenges.
“We can now access data we could not dream of getting in 2004 when we started this program — tens of thousands of human genome sequences have been generated,” said Eric D. Green, M.D., Ph.D., NHGRI director. “And yet, the information we would truly like to get for understanding disease and, eventually, for treating patients, requires much better quality sequence data. That is the direction we would like to go with these grants.”
The use of nanoscale devices for sequencing, reflected in many of these projects, is accelerating. To say that nanoscale devices function on a very small scale is an understatement. A human hair is 100,000 nanometers in diameter and a single strand of DNA is 2 nanometers in diameter.
“Several of the investigative teams will explore novel nanoscale sensing modes and approaches for manipulating DNA molecules with great precision by using nanoscale structures,” noted Jeffery A. Schloss, program director for NHGRI’s Advanced DNA Sequencing Technology Program.
The 2012 awards are:
Genapsys, Inc., Redwood City, CA.
Hesaam Esfandyarpour, Ph.D.
Funding amount: $1.2 million in fiscal 2012 (total $3.3 million over three years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Develop easy-to-use, chip-based DNA sequencing that combines multiple sample processing steps with sequencing in a single device called the Gene Electronic Nano-Integrated Ultra-Sensitive platform.
Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Jene Golovchenko, Ph.D., and Daniel Branton, Ph.D.
Funding amount: $1.2 million in fiscal 2012 (total $3.6 million over three years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Develop a scalable graphene nanopore sequencing device that will identify DNA subunits on unlabeled, single-stranded genomic DNA molecules. Graphene is a special arrangement of a single layer of carbon atoms. The nanopore is a hole in the graphene about two nanometers in diameter.
GnuBIO, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
Tal Raz, Ph.D., with David Weitz, Ph.D., Harvard University
Funding amount: $1.5 million fiscal 2012 (total $4.5 million over three years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Increase the throughput of the current single channel microfluidic instrument to enable whole genome sequencing in about six hours, including data analysis, genome alignment and variant calling. Microfluidics refers to plastic devices in which fluids move through tiny channels that are the diameter of a human hair.
Columbia University, New York City
Kenneth Shepard, Ph.D., with Marija Drndic, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Funding amount: $500,000 in FY2012 (total $1.5 million over three years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Develop much faster and more sensitive electronics to enable sequencing based on arrays of nanopores.
Intel Corp., Santa Clara, Calif., University of Twente, Enschede-Noord, Netherlands, Columbia University, Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA
Madoo Varma, Ph.D., Oguz H. Elibol, Ph.D., Xing Su, Ph.D., Serge Guy Lemay, Ph.D., Kenneth Shepard, Ph.D., Stephen Turner, Ph.D.
Funding amount: $1.2 million fiscal 2012 (total $5 million over four years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Develop a real-time, single-molecule sequencer that detects electrically active tags that will be attached to each of the four DNA subunits
Northeastern University, Boston, Pacific Biosciences
Meni Wanunu, Ph.D., and Jonas Korlach, Ph.D.
Funding amount: $300,000 fiscal 2012 (total $825,000 over 3 years subject to the availability of appropriations)
Aim: Reduce the cost of Pacific Biosciences’ single-molecule real-time (SMRT) DNA sequencing by reducing the amount of DNA needed to picogram levels. A picogram is 1 trillionth of a gram.
Comments (8)
by gatorallin
Thought these videos were interesting….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T-CEpvnqfA&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKhxoGcr4Rk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv-JHafk4UA&feature=relmfu
by gaoptimize
Credentialism in medicine is the social monopoly. It will need to be burned away in te coming economic collapse in order for technology-enabled revolutionary affordability advances to take place.
by Gabriel
Looks like the knee of the curve was 2007-2008….suddenly, the price suddenly starts shooting down after that.
by Dennis R.
I hope they can develop this in time to save Medicare/Medicaid/Obamacare, whatever you want to call it, from running out of money. Affordable, effective healthcare is something we, as a society (and someday a world) should be striving for.
by Bennie Beaver
I often feel like I’m talking in an echo chamber when I say that yearly I read about wonderful medical breakthroughs, and yet, when I visit the doctors office nothing but nothing is different. Yes, I understand that it may take money and time, but we need those new technologies yesterday or risk going broke as a country. We need this new breakthrough out there, and we need, at home, on body 24/7 monitoring using IBM Watson (now being developed for smart phones) that connect wireless to other smart system and doctor. The individual can do more to prevent and care for themselves if an, at home, on body system informs them daily about their health, and even provides natural solutions to correct developing health problems.
For some reason I continue to sense resistance from our for-profit health care system over basic necessities made up of hospitals, doctors, and insurance companies, etc. I continue to read that France has better outcomes for patients, etc.
Maybe America needs a new Manhattan Project to get those new technologies on the market. We may need this kind of translation project to get best of ideas together and on the market! We need a Steve Jobs of health care technologies in the industry.
by redindi
The old saying about the world being a global village comes into play here. Sure, there may be resistance from various sources in country A, B, C etc but in country D, E and F etc resistance will be less or non-existent and use of new technologies/treatments/cures quickly available. In this instance, surely the public pressure in countries A, B and C for said new technologies etc would be too much for the various parties to resist and so on and so forth. The internet/media today ensures that usage of new technolgies quickly becomes available throughout those countries where the public see a need for it and on a cost/benefit analysis (ie staying alive a lot longer in health etc even without pensions) makes sense. I think it’s been mentioned here before but many health providers only hope for long-term survival will be to change direction slightly to meet the publics changing needs. Lets hope so!
by melajara
I fully agree, but on the other hand, the curve displayed on this article is impressive. DNA sequencing cost have decreased 1000x in 5 years. If the curve doesn’t flatten in the following years, this would mean $10 for 2017 and 1 cent for 2022!!!
Below $100 per patient, sequencing will proceed on a massive scale, driving the prices further down below $10 very soon after.
Now take the smartphones, the best breed of current generation has the computing power of a 2007 good laptop or a 2005 good desktop PC.
Soon enough they will be endowed with a paraphernalia of sensors (e.g.artificial noses to assess food quality or personal hygiene!). It is quite sure IMHO that those ubiquitous device will act as trojan horses to enforce a more prophylactic medicine.
Sure, this is not in the best (selfish)interest of big pharmas, and with their active and nefarious lobbying, I see here the principal source of resistance for medical progress.
Hopefully those companies will understand they have to reinvent themselves in more fruitful “products”, e.g. in aggressive rejuvenation therapies for an hedonistic society of aging people (see e.g. the credible world envisionned by Bruce Sterling in his lovely “Holy Fire” novel).
by Gorden Russell
Soon a medical worker in a third-world country will sequence genes from a small pack hanging from one shoulder, just like Dr. Bones McCoy.