<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New way to make synthetic collagen for regenerating tissues, organs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/new-way-to-make-synthetic-collagen-for-regenerating-tissues-organs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/new-way-to-make-synthetic-collagen-for-regenerating-tissues-organs</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: melajara</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/new-way-to-make-synthetic-collagen-for-regenerating-tissues-organs/comment-page-1#comment-4665</link>
		<dc:creator>melajara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=127972#comment-4665</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting and promising research. But as usual there is at the end of the article the typical caveat, &quot;clinical trials, if they prove warranted, are at least five years away&quot;. 
This is so typical of regenerative medicine, always 5, 10 or more years away. Is there not a generic way we could accelerate the transition from proof of concept to general availability? We need a kind of Marshall plan here to move on or the baby boomers hanging here will be all dead before this kind of research comes to fruition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting and promising research. But as usual there is at the end of the article the typical caveat, &#8220;clinical trials, if they prove warranted, are at least five years away&#8221;.<br />
This is so typical of regenerative medicine, always 5, 10 or more years away. Is there not a generic way we could accelerate the transition from proof of concept to general availability? We need a kind of Marshall plan here to move on or the baby boomers hanging here will be all dead before this kind of research comes to fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
