Comments on: Portable peer review http://www.kurzweilai.net/portable-peer-review Accelerating Intelligence Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:10:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Giulio Prisco http://www.kurzweilai.net/portable-peer-review/comment-page-1#comment-98865 Giulio Prisco Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:52:41 +0000 http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=180340#comment-98865 Fixing the broken "pee-review" process of the obsolete paper press, with its petty jealousies and ridiculous delays and costs, especially with streamlined procedures like publish first and peer review later, will certainly make more good quality papers available. This does not, by itself, ensure that _you_ can download and use the papers. For that, you need to support open access scientific publishing. As a taxpayer, you have already paid all public-funded research results, why should you pay twice? Fixing the broken “pee-review” process of the obsolete paper press, with its petty jealousies and ridiculous delays and costs, especially with streamlined procedures like publish first and peer review later, will certainly make more good quality papers available.

This does not, by itself, ensure that _you_ can download and use the papers. For that, you need to support open access scientific publishing. As a taxpayer, you have already paid all public-funded research results, why should you pay twice?

]]> By: WLGJR http://www.kurzweilai.net/portable-peer-review/comment-page-1#comment-98862 WLGJR Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:03:30 +0000 http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=180340#comment-98862 Wondering why our friend Giulio Prisco is not commenting on this. Does this make *more good-quality papers* available? That I can just download and *use*? Wondering why our friend Giulio Prisco is not commenting on this.
Does this make *more good-quality papers* available? That I can just download and *use*?

]]>