Privately owned genetic databases may hinder diagnosis
November 2, 2012

(Credit: U.S. Department of Energy Human Genome Program/Wikimedia Commons)
This week, the European Journal of Human Genetics published an article showing that Myriad Genetics, providers of the BRCA1/2 genetic test, has amassed vast quantities of clinical data without sharing it, Professor Martina Cornel, chair of the European Society of Human Genetics‘ Professional and Public Policy committee, said:
“We are very concerned that such important data is being withheld from those who most need it. Interpreting the variants of unknown significance (VUS) that may be found on analyzing the patient’s genome plays an essential part in being able to provide proper counselling and if necessary, preventive or therapeutic guidance.
“By not sharing their data on the VUS obtained from individuals undergoing BRCA1/2 testing, where Myriad is the sole commercial provider of a test in the U.S., geneticists have been unable to develop the up-to-date algorithms that are necessary to best interpret the effects of genetic variants. While Myriad has access to public databases in order to help interpret their VUS results, this is currently not reciprocal.”
“We know that, regrettably, medical geographic inequities are common, but what is particularly worrying about this situation is that it is the first time that such inequities have been based on a lack of access to clinical information, rather than lack of a product. Myriad’s stated aim to enter the European market more vigorously may lead to unfair competition with academic institutions for predictive precision.
“It is vital that progress towards personalized medicine, which holds out so much promise, is not hindered by companies maintaining private genomic databases. Policymakers should take an urgent look at the regulatory and reimbursement issues involved in genomic testing in order for all the data that is essential to understanding the clinical significance of VUS to be made public, to the benefit of patients and healthcare providers alike.”
Comments (7)
by Sea Bass
I doubt it. Myriad’s 2012 revenue tops 470 mill. No one will jump in now and topple that, unless Myriad shares the data. I’m all for free enterprise, but this reeks of a monopoly. Especially if the data is necessary for others to compete, which it is.
by Dennis R.
Myriad Genetics doesn’t “own” the genetic material they analyzed, do they? They are taking advantage of other shared databases of this type of information, yet are unwilling to share the same type of information which they’ve analyzed. This is less about science and more about trying to create a business advantage.
This is embarrassing to read about.
by Mr.X
“Professor Martina Cornel, chair of the European Society of Human Genetics‘ Professional and Public Policy committee, said:”
Europe= Communist alarm!
by de Broglie
If governments do not allow private investment to be favorable, then private investement will flow into this field.
by de Broglie
I meant to say, “willl NOT flow into this field.”
by Craig
So it is developed privately but the government wants to co-op it now, or am I misunderstanding?
by Imperator03
Sigh. Ignorance is everywhere. Myriad is the only provider today. If they’re stupid enough to withhold data people want, I’m pretty sure some bright energetic people will form an new company to out-compete Myriad. Let us not forget that it wasn’t a government-sponsored group that solved the human genome project, but a private group who got it done under budget and before the deadline.