Researchers prove that memories reside in specific brain cells
March 23, 2012
In a new MIT study, researchers used optogenetics to show that memories reside in very specific brain cells, and that simply activating a tiny fraction of brain cells can recall an entire memory — explaining, for example, how Marcel Proust could recapitulate his childhood from the aroma of a once-beloved madeleine cookie.
“We demonstrate that behavior based on high-level cognition, such as the expression of a specific memory, can be generated in a mammal by highly specific physical activation of a specific small subpopulation of brain cells, in this case by light,” says Susumu Tonegawa, the Picower Professor of Biology and Neuroscience at MIT and lead author of the study reported online today in the journal Nature.
“This is the rigorously designed 21st-century test of Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield’s early-1900s accidental observation suggesting that mind is based on matter.”
In that famous surgery, Penfield treated epilepsy patients by scooping out parts of the brain where seizures originated. To ensure that he destroyed only the problematic neurons, Penfield stimulated the brain with tiny jolts of electricity while patients, who were under local anesthesia, reported what they were experiencing. Remarkably, some vividly recalled entire complex events when Penfield stimulated just a few neurons in the hippocampus, a region now considered essential to the formation and recall of episodic memories.
Scientists have continued to explore that phenomenon but, until now, it has never been proven that the direct reactivation of the hippocampus was sufficient to cause memory recall.
Shedding light on the matter
To directly test the hypothesis about memory encoding and storage in a mimicry experiment, the researchers chose optogenetics, which can stimulate neurons that are genetically modified to express light-activated proteins. That would provide experimental evidence that even ephemeral phenomena, such as personal memories, reside in the physical machinery of the brain.
The researchers first identified a specific set of brain cells in the hippocampus that were active only when a mouse was learning about a new environment. They determined which genes were activated in those cells, and coupled them with the gene for channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), a light-activated protein used in optogenetics.
Next, they studied mice with this genetic couplet in the cells of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, using tiny optical fibers to deliver pulses of light to the neurons. The light-activated protein would only be expressed in the neurons involved in experiential learning — an ingenious way to allow for labeling of the physical network of neurons associated with a specific memory engram for a specific experience.
Finally, the mice entered an environment and, after a few minutes of exploration, received a mild foot shock, learning to fear the particular environment in which the shock occurred. The brain cells activated during this fear conditioning became tagged with ChR2. Later, when exposed to triggering pulses of light in a completely different environment, the neurons involved in the fear memory switched on — and the mice quickly entered a defensive, immobile crouch.
False memory
This light-induced freezing suggested that the animals were actually recalling the memory of being shocked. The mice apparently perceived this replay of a fearful memory — but the memory was artificially reactivated. “Our results show that memories really do reside in very specific brain cells,” says says co-author Xu Liu, a postdoc in Tonegawa’s lab, “and simply by reactivating these cells by physical means, such as light, an entire memory can be recalled.
“René Descartes didn’t believe the mind can be studied as a natural science. He was wrong. This experimental method is the ultimate way of demonstrating that mind, like memory recall, is based on changes in matter.”
“This remarkable work exhibits the power of combining the latest technologies to attack one of neurobiology’s central problems,” says Charles Stevens, a professor in the Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory at the Salk Institute who was not involved in this research. “Showing that the reactivation of those nerve cells that were active during learning can reproduce the learned behavior is surely a milestone.”
The method may also have applications in the study of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders.
Ref.: Xu Liu, et al., Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall, Nature, 2012; [DOI:10.1038/nature11028]

Comments (12)
by Beatriz Valdes
I was amazed at Deepak Chopra´s comment -in one of his audios- that we do not know where a melody, for instance, resides, before a player begins to execute it! This article, and the comments about it, clarify the point that we DO KNOW where information is stored: IN THE BRAIN. Brain surgery has even located the precise location of certain events, but we all have heard about that. Not Deepak apparently.
by Al Babich
Yes you need a brain to have a mind ( Check into the concept of Connectomes), but one trained response does not the “mind” make. Delagoto (spelling) did the same thing with a bull. Mind is a collection of neurons, brain waves, neurotransmitters (and more) that fires uniquely at any given moment to make choices that are sometimes contrary to hard wired brain like survival. Why do fireman go in a burning building. Their brain tells them to avoid life threating situations. Their “mind” directs them to save lives.
by Exploding Diarrhea
Looks like a techno colour vagina.
by David S
How about this as an article headline: “Science writers demonstrate damage the actual understanding of mind/brain interaction by irresponsibly shining light on overly suggestive simplifications of research data.”
It is a tragic leap to assume that the crouch reaction is evidence that “an entire memory can be recalled” from stimulation. Stimulating a small number of neurons can trigger brain activity resulting in behavior consistent with a danger/pain response. The felt experience is just as unknown as before, and now hundreds if not thousands of people will have the wrong impression of how memory works. Dang ol’ grandmother cell concept.
by Chrispium
Imagine a future, soon to come, where interrogators can read your mind as you think and also make you recall your entire lifes worth of memories.
Nothing will be hidden from scrutiny, it’ll be total auditing. All crime, significant or not, will be revealed and you’ll be the witness against yourself.
Interesting times indeed ;)
by Mentalyptis
Pfff.. madeleines are magical and make time-travel possible. EOS.
by TF
Very misleading title: suggests that a specific memory is stored in a specifc cell, which would be a drastic, radical change from how he currently hypothesize information processing in the brain actually works. Turns out, the article is saying something much more banal – that memory is something that the brain does. Wow. Great job disproving Descartes. I thought that had been done already.
by Samer
No, the memory exists in the pathway that the neuron activates. A neuron cannot contain a memory.
by Ryan
The memory may not reside IN that brain cell; it may be in the connections that brain cell uniquely maintains with other cells. By activating it, you activate the others it is connected to.
by Lukas K
The same principle is at work in all neural network firings! Circuits with emotional connections (stamps) are more easily fired. It doesn’t take as many input indexes to activate the neural circuitry.
This study is in line with my brief explanation of the ‘Cridabmge Wrod Gmae’! http://agintelligence.wordpress.com/2011/09/07/cridabmge-wrod-gmae/
;0)
by Mindprowler
I imagine something like this could have very interesting applications in future virtual reality technologies. Visually experiencing past memories rather than simply recalling them would be very cool, it would be like controlled dreaming. I’d love to see something like that developed one day.
by Mikus
Sorry…new poster…meant link below.