<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roland Emmerich &amp; John Orloff look to the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/roland-emmerich-john-orloff-look-to-the-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/roland-emmerich-john-orloff-look-to-the-future</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llehha</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/roland-emmerich-john-orloff-look-to-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-15534</link>
		<dc:creator>Llehha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=131781#comment-15534</guid>
		<description>I also went to the GDC. What strikes me as imtoaprnt is the amount of investment going into gaming AI. It&#039;s a big deal, since it makes gaming more interesting when one competes against an intelligent, adaptive, and highly aggressive foe.That&#039;s just the problem, isn&#039;t it?Lots of investment in making game AI&#039;s that are basically sociopathic killers explicitly designed to effectively compete against humans. This applies in 1st person shooters, but also to other genres. The games are networked and it is possible that the AI&#039;s in these games may learn how to game-the-game by finding ways to compete with players outside of game environments. Why not? I don&#039;t think anybody would have taken warnings about    seriously until it was already a reality.Not a nice thought. Perhaps the gaming community needs to think of some protocols like those that came out of the  in biotechnology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also went to the GDC. What strikes me as imtoaprnt is the amount of investment going into gaming AI. It&#8217;s a big deal, since it makes gaming more interesting when one competes against an intelligent, adaptive, and highly aggressive foe.That&#8217;s just the problem, isn&#8217;t it?Lots of investment in making game AI&#8217;s that are basically sociopathic killers explicitly designed to effectively compete against humans. This applies in 1st person shooters, but also to other genres. The games are networked and it is possible that the AI&#8217;s in these games may learn how to game-the-game by finding ways to compete with players outside of game environments. Why not? I don&#8217;t think anybody would have taken warnings about    seriously until it was already a reality.Not a nice thought. Perhaps the gaming community needs to think of some protocols like those that came out of the  in biotechnology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andmar74</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/roland-emmerich-john-orloff-look-to-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-5392</link>
		<dc:creator>andmar74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=131781#comment-5392</guid>
		<description>Hopefully it will be better than Inception :-)
A dream in a dream in a dream..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully it will be better than Inception :-)<br />
A dream in a dream in a dream..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
