Solar power without solar cells: A hidden magnetic effect of light could make it possible
April 15, 2011
A dramatic and surprising magnetic effect of light discovered by University of Michigan researchers could lead to solar power without traditional semiconductor-based solar cells.
The researchers found a way to make an “optical battery,” said Stephen Rand, a professor in the departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Physics and Applied Physics.
Light has electric and magnetic components. Until now, scientists thought the effects of the magnetic field were so weak that they could be ignored. What Rand and his colleagues found is that at the right intensity, when light is traveling through a material that does not conduct electricity, the light field can generate magnetic effects that are 100 million times stronger than previously expected. Under these circumstances, the magnetic effects develop strength equivalent to a strong electric effect.
“This could lead to a new kind of solar cell without semiconductors and without absorption to produce charge separation,” Rand said. “In solar cells, the light goes into a material, gets absorbed and creates heat. Here, we expect to have a very low heat load. Instead of the light being absorbed, energy is stored in the magnetic moment. Intense magnetization can be induced by intense light and then it is ultimately capable of providing a capacitive power source.”
What makes this possible is a previously undetected brand of “optical rectification,” says William Fisher, a doctoral student in applied physics. In traditional optical rectification, light’s electric field causes a charge separation, or a pulling apart of the positive and negative charges in a material. This sets up a voltage, similar to that in a battery. This electric effect had previously been detected only in crystalline materials that possessed a certain symmetry.
Rand and Fisher found that under the right circumstances and in other types of materials, the light’s magnetic field can also create optical rectification.
“It turns out that the magnetic field starts curving the electrons into a C-shape and they move forward a little each time,” Fisher said. “That C-shape of charge motion generates both an electric dipole and a magnetic dipole. If we can set up many of these in a row in a long fiber, we can make a huge voltage and by extracting that voltage, we can use it as a power source.”
The light must be shone through a material that does not conduct electricity, such as glass. And it must be focused to an intensity of 10 million watts per square centimeter. Sunlight isn’t this intense on its own, but new materials are being sought that would work at lower intensities, Fisher said.
“In our most recent paper, we show that incoherent light like sunlight is theoretically almost as effective in producing charge separation as laser light is,” Fisher said.
This new technique could make solar power cheaper, the researchers say. They predict that with improved materials they could achieve 10 percent efficiency in converting solar power to useable energy. That’s equivalent to today’s commercial-grade solar cells.
“To manufacture modern solar cells, you have to do extensive semiconductor processing,” Fisher said. “All we would need are lenses to focus the light and a fiber to guide it. Glass works for both. It’s already made in bulk, and it doesn’t require as much processing. Transparent ceramics might be even better.”
In experiments this summer, the researchers will work on harnessing this power with laser light, and then with sunlight.
The paper is titled “Optically-induced charge separation and terahertz emission in unbiased dielectrics.”
Comments (5)
by PlayForFood
Marvelous and inspiring. Discoveries like this continue to improve our understanding of the underlining physics of matter. Only good can come from this. I hope more young people will be drawn into this area, and metamaterials.
by JimL
This kind of PR is a form of intellectual dishonesty, in my opinion. Direct sunlight has an intensity of about a tenth watt per square centimeter, some eight orders of magnitude too faint for this effect to be important without dramatic gains after much more research. The best sunlight concentrating systems have an upper limit of, as I recall, less than 100,000x due to hard physics limits, require expensive materials and processing, and of course must be on tracking mounts to work at all. The researchers and the article’s author ignore all these costs and downsides, sweeping them all under the rug. While I am a supporter of solar power and use 6300 watts of it on the roof of my home, I have to say that the industry and its university researchers would do themselves a favor not to keep issuing these glowing press releases that all too often turn into nothing but future disappointment. The general public keeps hearing all these geewiz claims that don’t turn into viable products. It is no wonder the average guy on the street is turned off to alternate energy claims.
by TheVenusProject.Com
This is the game changer in Energy. But Unfortunately we all know that these kinds of Innovations and Scientific Breakthroughs would soon get “Silenced’ for the sake of the Larger and More Powerful Corporations which would just bribe out the authors and buy their Patents.. OR if they would not achieve that they would sabotage them and forcefully take out the Patents for the Invention thus leaving the world without an ACCESS to those inevtnions.. Worlds Top 1% would be using all these technologies for their own best interests thus further unemploying Billions of people.. We have got to be thinking somehow to DEMONTAGE todays Monetary System and build a brand New Economy based not on Money as we know it.. But on Resources of the Planet.. thats exaclty what the Venus Project proposes : To learn more about the Venus Project: Venus Project FAQ: http://thevenusproject.com/en/the-venus-project-introduction/faq
by Timbo555
Hey Venus,
I read your little Utopian screed. It is high tech communism. Period. You talk of this enormous disruption of Capital markets; indeed the destruction of capitalism to further your ends. Who agrees with you now? What kind of ridiculous movie could you make that would make more than a few hundred people agree with you after it’s first “world wide” screening? It brings to mind one of those Mickey Rooney movies in which he rallies the gang to put on a show and raise some money to save the park or the old folks home or some such. The difference between their scheme and yours of course is that theirs worked. On the other hand, neither yours nor theirs is based in reality, so don’t feel too badly.
Have you considered that hundreds of millions, and quite probably a billion or more people would die following the financial collapse and ensuing depression? And then of course there would be the decades of wars killing an additional billion or more people. Or do you and your “planners” have a means by which you can transform the world in your image without precipitating a world wide catastrophe? Or are you ghoulish enough to have already taken that inevitability into account and are OK with
It.
Further, your suggestion that this will happen with out any one group of people (other than your gang, I’m guessing) assuming control of the enormous political power attendant to this kind of world domination is ludicrous. An enormously complex transformation requires leadership, and my first impulse would always be to kill the person who wants to rule the world.
Your utopia would render the world an unlivable place, simply because you would have to enforce your will on the masses. Stop it. Go away. To quote Jack Nicholson in more recent movie. “Go sell crazy somewhere else; we’re full up here.”
by innovator116
No need to be afraid of big oil and big corporations…what it takes to reverse engineer and make open designs based on such technologies. There will be situation when, people will be forced to break patent law…for survival.
So don’t care about patents and copyrights…just try to implement technologies in an open source manner.