<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Artilect War: Cosmists Vs. Terrans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-artilect-war-cosmists-vs-terrans/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-artilect-war-cosmists-vs-terrans</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-artilect-war-cosmists-vs-terrans/comment-page-1#comment-96289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=103190#comment-96289</guid>
		<description>&quot;My dream is to create &quot;artilects,&quot; or artificial intellects, with intellectual capacities many orders of magnitude above human levels. The scale of these systems will eventually shrink to the molecular level, with one bit per atom. But high-function systems will still require many bits or atoms. And with that large size comes an enormous heat-dissipation problem.

If you can develop a system that dissipates zero heat - using reversible computing, for example - it&#039;ll be possible to build asteroid-sized, or even moon-sized, artilects, if you want to get into science fiction. By the late 21st century, you&#039;re talking huge computing capacities with 10&lt;sup&gt;30&lt;/sup&gt; or 10&lt;sup&gt;40&lt;/sup&gt; components. Compare that to our brains, which have around 10&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt; -- that is, tens of billions -- neurons.&quot;

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/degaris_pr.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My dream is to create &#8220;artilects,&#8221; or artificial intellects, with intellectual capacities many orders of magnitude above human levels. The scale of these systems will eventually shrink to the molecular level, with one bit per atom. But high-function systems will still require many bits or atoms. And with that large size comes an enormous heat-dissipation problem.</p>
<p>If you can develop a system that dissipates zero heat &#8211; using reversible computing, for example &#8211; it&#8217;ll be possible to build asteroid-sized, or even moon-sized, artilects, if you want to get into science fiction. By the late 21st century, you&#8217;re talking huge computing capacities with 10<sup>30</sup> or 10<sup>40</sup> components. Compare that to our brains, which have around 10<sup>10</sup> &#8212; that is, tens of billions &#8212; neurons.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/degaris_pr.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/degaris_pr.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WLGJR</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-artilect-war-cosmists-vs-terrans/comment-page-1#comment-96283</link>
		<dc:creator>WLGJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=103190#comment-96283</guid>
		<description>1040 components (of an artilect)? How did he come up with that figure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1040 components (of an artilect)? How did he come up with that figure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let the AIs, not us, formulate a billion-year plan! &#124;Trax Asia™</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-artilect-war-cosmists-vs-terrans/comment-page-1#comment-41506</link>
		<dc:creator>Let the AIs, not us, formulate a billion-year plan! &#124;Trax Asia™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=103190#comment-41506</guid>
		<description>[...] (Google car). (I’m personally skeptical of the efficacy of friendly AI long-term, concurring with Hugo de Garis; but read Steve Omohundro’s defense [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Google car). (I’m personally skeptical of the efficacy of friendly AI long-term, concurring with Hugo de Garis; but read Steve Omohundro’s defense [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
