The ‘chemputer’ that could print out any drug
July 26, 2012
Professor Lee Cronin has turned a 3D printer into a universal chemistry set that could make its own prescription drugs via downloadable chemistry.
Cronin is the leader of a world-class team of 45 researchers at Glasgow University, primarily making complex molecules.
The “inks” are simple reagents, from which more complex molecules are formed.
As he points out, nearly all drugs are made of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, as well as readily available agents such as vegetable oils and paraffin. “With a printer it should be possible that with a relatively small number of inks you can make any organic molecule,” he says.
The real beauty of Cronin’s prototype system, however, is that it allows the printer not only to control the sequences and exact calibration of inks, but also to shape, from a tested blueprint, the environment in which those reactions take place. The scale and architecture of the miniature printed “lab” could be pre-programmed into software and downloaded for use with a standard set of inks. In this way, not only the combinations of reactants but also the ratios and speed at which they combine could be ingrained into the system, simply by changing the size of reaction chambers and their relation with one another;
Cronin calls this “reactionware” or, because it depends on a conceptualised sequence of flow and reorientation in a 3D space, “Rubik’s Cube chemistry”.
The next stage, also successfully demonstrated, and where things start to get interesting, is the ability to “print” catalysts into the walls of the reactionware. Much further down the line he envisages far more complex reactor environments, which would enable chemistry to be done “in the presence of a liver cell that has cancer, or a newly identified superbug”, with all the implications that might have for drug research.
UPDATE 7/26/2012: Cronin adds the caveat that they are still essentially at the “science fiction” stage of this process.

Comments (17)
by Andrés Gómez
It should not be “Selfish Matter.” If we take the analogous equivalent of the “Selfish Gene” we would have to think about how every pattern arises; when we focus on sub-gene patterns that replicate, then we might as well call it the selfish drive of the pattern.
by Bri
It’s a principal that has been talked about for years. That a desk top box could produce anything, like the steamy chicken , in the microwave, in Fith Element. These are the precursors to that tech. The article may be mildly misleading, but I suspect that they are s little sheepish about, what they are up to. Even to loose a single blockbuster drug will hurt the drug companies. In time it will have the same effects that we are exploring. “printers” will grow in capability at the same breakneck speed we are seeing in all fields. It still is an elegant proof of concept, even if it does resemble the first transistor now. Shame though, it would be great if we could push a button and get all those supplements that Ray takes!!!
by Nick
I believe this article summary is easily misinterpreted. Many people will read it believing that this prototype 3D printer is already capable of printing prescription drugs. It should make it clearer that Professor Lee Cronin has made a 3d printer that COULD print any prescription drug, not that it CAN. (In other words, if further R&D pans out.)
The original article explains that, “In the shorter term, his team is looking at ways in which relatively simple drugs – ibuprofen is the example they are using – might be successfully produced in their 3D printer or portable “chemputer”. If that principle can be established, then the possibilities suddenly seem endless.”
and also:
“Not surprisingly Cronin is excited by these prospects, though he continually adds the caveat that they are still essentially at the “science fiction” stage of this process.”
by Editor
Agreed, updated
by Ralph Dratman
Every drug company monitors the strength and purity of its products. Will the same quality control be built into home-printed drugs? Pardon me if I doubt that.
by Bri
Cats out of the bag. Now that the proof of concept is over, somebody somewhere will make one for nefarious purposes. It’s a big game changer. Think of all the pension money invested in drug companies. No more pharmacies, cocaine growers, etc. Could wipe out all dope dealers too!
by Gorden Russell
The Mexican narco cartel has murdered 50,000 innocent people. This could put them out of business…but it will lead to another 50,000 innocents being slaughtered on this side of the border.
by Bernard
This is on a par with the printed firearm story. Anyone motivated enough to want one of these will have one and like the gun enthusiasts there will be a big community spreading knowledge to all interested parties.
by egore
Wonderful tool, could have deadly consequences.
by Jonathan Cole
If ‘the government’ can get a malware code into an iranian secure nuclear facility then they can certainly get some into your chemprinter, to send them info on what you are making. Get comfortable with the idea that NOTHING you do can remain private for any length of time, starting very soon. Plan accordingly!
by melajara
It will be very interesting to see if those “reactors”, once real, could be miniaturized enough to be embedded in our bodies if not our cells (somewhat completing the Golgi apparatus), then we’ll have another path to emmortality.
by Spotted Marley
@Bill .. paranoid much? you know that’s a common drug side effect
by Bill
Illegal designer drugs labs are going to set this up in the garage producing drugs that keep you up all night completely lucid so you can study for that exam, drugs that are so addictive you’ll never be free of them, new highs that will make cocaine look like caffeine.
by Roma
On the bright side, the pushers will only be able to charge you for the convenience of getting you the drug ready made.
After all, with open source printers, online instruction, and ‘motivation’ you or your clever friend can duplicate the setup to produce your own supply.
by Marcos Marin
Only if your “clever friend” is pharmaco-chemist with enough time and motivation to reverse engineer yet-another designer drug. Let alone risking getting any little detail wrong and overdosing you with a more potent version or bypassing cytochromes you might have less copies of in your genes ;-) Thus, professionals will have a lot to gain from proprietary “code”, in the beginning at least.
by Devon
You make it sound like being addicted to a drug that improves cognitive capacity is a bad thing… So long as there are no harmful side affects, why not? After all, aren’t we all addicted to sugar, caffeine, and plenty of sleep? All of these act by altering our bio-chemistry in a way that is not fundamentally out of the reach of drugs. This could be greatly elaborated upon, but surely you can see my point.
by Bri
Like I said in earlier posts, soon your cell phone will make your doctor, and the drug companies obsolete. The ” phone” will diagnose, and prescribe. Then this type of printer will make the drug. It’s just that it could also make heroin, or a toxin. Can be very good, we just tend to be bad. ( I really hate my enemy, I’ll fix thier wagon!).