<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Law of Accelerating Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-149196</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-149196</guid>
		<description>Evidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-127457</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-127457</guid>
		<description>&quot; In mathematics, all exponential growth results in asymptotes. There are, however, no physical asymptotes – they simply do not exist.&quot;

There is a physical limit at the end of the century. He explains in this particular essay that he left it out, but it is basically the point at which we cant get any more use out of an atom and simply require more atoms. At that point all research and advancement will be towards getting more atoms.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
&quot;That is why we “stew” on things to think them through – our brain needs to be preoccupied sometimes (watching TV, listening to music, etc.) in order to “think”. Our brain doesn’t do the thinking, that is a metaphysical thing.&quot;

We are unaware of the vast majority of our brains activity. This is the work being done in the subconscious. We are only aware of the activity on the thin outer film on the outside of the brain, and we have even shown that many of the decisions we think we consciously make were actually your subconscious making the decision and lying to you conscious brain that you made the decision. You can tell these &quot;decisions&quot; apart from the rest by asking yourself if you actually considered alternatives to what you just did; if not, that is your subconscious. Your subconscious considers almost every thing you could possibly do next, and analyzes the world in very unconventional ways... sometimes seeing past our rigid conception of reality. 95% of our brain is in the subconscious. Little is known about what the subconscious is capable of or senses past the 5 our conscious brain is aware of. Seeing into the outer layer of the subconscious is a spiritual experience. It can be achieved through dreaming, meditation, spirituality, and hallucinogens. 
When you &quot;feel&quot; things you are not aware of or &quot;stew&quot;, this is your subconscious working away. This is the real you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
&quot;Thinking that cognitive self-awareness comes from neural activity is a stretch that is not supported by any medical knowledge, it is simply assumed&quot; 

Self awareness is shown to take place in the brain only when it is in a highly interconnected state. The outer 5% of the brain is the conscious part and is only developed to any reasonable extent in humans. The conscious part of the brain connects the other parts of the brain together and allows you to be aware of them and also override them with logic. Scientific inquiry into this by watching chain reactions in the brain has shown that when are are no longer self aware, the difference in the brain is that the separate parts are no longer communicating with each other...they are simply acting. This is how it is in animals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; In mathematics, all exponential growth results in asymptotes. There are, however, no physical asymptotes – they simply do not exist.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a physical limit at the end of the century. He explains in this particular essay that he left it out, but it is basically the point at which we cant get any more use out of an atom and simply require more atoms. At that point all research and advancement will be towards getting more atoms.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8220;That is why we “stew” on things to think them through – our brain needs to be preoccupied sometimes (watching TV, listening to music, etc.) in order to “think”. Our brain doesn’t do the thinking, that is a metaphysical thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>We are unaware of the vast majority of our brains activity. This is the work being done in the subconscious. We are only aware of the activity on the thin outer film on the outside of the brain, and we have even shown that many of the decisions we think we consciously make were actually your subconscious making the decision and lying to you conscious brain that you made the decision. You can tell these &#8220;decisions&#8221; apart from the rest by asking yourself if you actually considered alternatives to what you just did; if not, that is your subconscious. Your subconscious considers almost every thing you could possibly do next, and analyzes the world in very unconventional ways&#8230; sometimes seeing past our rigid conception of reality. 95% of our brain is in the subconscious. Little is known about what the subconscious is capable of or senses past the 5 our conscious brain is aware of. Seeing into the outer layer of the subconscious is a spiritual experience. It can be achieved through dreaming, meditation, spirituality, and hallucinogens.<br />
When you &#8220;feel&#8221; things you are not aware of or &#8220;stew&#8221;, this is your subconscious working away. This is the real you.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8220;Thinking that cognitive self-awareness comes from neural activity is a stretch that is not supported by any medical knowledge, it is simply assumed&#8221; </p>
<p>Self awareness is shown to take place in the brain only when it is in a highly interconnected state. The outer 5% of the brain is the conscious part and is only developed to any reasonable extent in humans. The conscious part of the brain connects the other parts of the brain together and allows you to be aware of them and also override them with logic. Scientific inquiry into this by watching chain reactions in the brain has shown that when are are no longer self aware, the difference in the brain is that the separate parts are no longer communicating with each other&#8230;they are simply acting. This is how it is in animals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Roth</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-127418</link>
		<dc:creator>John Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-127418</guid>
		<description>Are you sure about this? Animal often communicate non-verbally because they don&#039;t have a structured, organized universal way of communicating with one another. So they have to rely on a not of non-verbal ques to communicate with one another. Therefore you example of &quot;walking into a room with an argument&quot; isn&#039;t a very good example of a &quot;spiritual&quot; perception, because humans display certain actions and characteristic when under pressure, and some of us have been wired to perceive these unconscious non-verbal forms of communication. Looks of worry, muscles tensing up, frowns, fidgeting...

It&#039;s a romantic idea that we have a soul, but to claim we have souls is to deny the elegance and beauty that is our brains. So don&#039;t be mean to your brain, give credit where credit&#039;s due!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure about this? Animal often communicate non-verbally because they don&#8217;t have a structured, organized universal way of communicating with one another. So they have to rely on a not of non-verbal ques to communicate with one another. Therefore you example of &#8220;walking into a room with an argument&#8221; isn&#8217;t a very good example of a &#8220;spiritual&#8221; perception, because humans display certain actions and characteristic when under pressure, and some of us have been wired to perceive these unconscious non-verbal forms of communication. Looks of worry, muscles tensing up, frowns, fidgeting&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a romantic idea that we have a soul, but to claim we have souls is to deny the elegance and beauty that is our brains. So don&#8217;t be mean to your brain, give credit where credit&#8217;s due!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodoore Aborgone</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-104611</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodoore Aborgone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-104611</guid>
		<description>40 trillion?  For what??
(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40 trillion?  For what??<br />
(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nsc</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-88849</link>
		<dc:creator>nsc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 07:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-88849</guid>
		<description>It is mind bogging yet well supported by facts...dear sir may I bring one area that could sweep all other areas...exponential increase is BADLY needed in personal conduct,wash-out of negative thinking ,and being
autonomous .
old indian scriptures DO mention that such is possible.but that is all to
it...probably suspecting misuse.   from nsc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is mind bogging yet well supported by facts&#8230;dear sir may I bring one area that could sweep all other areas&#8230;exponential increase is BADLY needed in personal conduct,wash-out of negative thinking ,and being<br />
autonomous .<br />
old indian scriptures DO mention that such is possible.but that is all to<br />
it&#8230;probably suspecting misuse.   from nsc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watching Science Unfold Live - Dynamic Patterns Research</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-42443</link>
		<dc:creator>Watching Science Unfold Live - Dynamic Patterns Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-42443</guid>
		<description>[...] Experiencing inspirational scientific events and participating in accessible scientific activities can provide great informal educational opportunities for the public. These experiences will increase our appreciation for the Universe, which is vital for our continued exponentially increasing rate of human advancement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Experiencing inspirational scientific events and participating in accessible scientific activities can provide great informal educational opportunities for the public. These experiences will increase our appreciation for the Universe, which is vital for our continued exponentially increasing rate of human advancement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Karthikeyan</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-42122</link>
		<dc:creator>M Karthikeyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 03:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-42122</guid>
		<description>UIM (Ultra Intelligent machines) 
&quot; ultra-intelligent machine could design even better machines&quot; document in 1960s are not far from reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UIM (Ultra Intelligent machines)<br />
&#8221; ultra-intelligent machine could design even better machines&#8221; document in 1960s are not far from reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let the AIs, not us, formulate a billion-year plan! &#124;Trax Asia™</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-41505</link>
		<dc:creator>Let the AIs, not us, formulate a billion-year plan! &#124;Trax Asia™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41505</guid>
		<description>[...] Unfortunately, Garretson does not mention the single most important development in the future: the coming technological Singularity, when machine intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to &#8220;technological change so rapid and profound it will represent a rupture in the fabric of human history,&#8221; according to Ray Kurzweil. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately, Garretson does not mention the single most important development in the future: the coming technological Singularity, when machine intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to &#8220;technological change so rapid and profound it will represent a rupture in the fabric of human history,&#8221; according to Ray Kurzweil. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the difference between an intelligent computer and a life form?</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-36232</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the difference between an intelligent computer and a life form?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-36232</guid>
		<description>[...] capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating&#8212;what Kurzweil calls the &quot;Law of Accelerating Returns.&quot; He writes that: So we won&#039;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century&#8212;it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating&#8212;what Kurzweil calls the &quot;Law of Accelerating Returns.&quot; He writes that: So we won&#039;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century&#8212;it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le paradis est-il un ordinateur ?</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-35905</link>
		<dc:creator>Le paradis est-il un ordinateur ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-35905</guid>
		<description>[...] qui le développement accéléré des techniques et en particulier de la puissance de calcul (cf la Loi du Retour Accéléré de Ray Kurzweil ) soutiendra naturellement une progression menant des prothèses cérébrales (implants [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] qui le développement accéléré des techniques et en particulier de la puissance de calcul (cf la Loi du Retour Accéléré de Ray Kurzweil ) soutiendra naturellement une progression menant des prothèses cérébrales (implants [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategic is the new tactical &#124; cut//through: Wayne Aspland&#039;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-33678</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategic is the new tactical &#124; cut//through: Wayne Aspland&#039;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 05:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-33678</guid>
		<description>[...] Ray Kurzweil should be paying me a commission. Ever since I stumbled across his Law of Accelerating Returns in New Scientist in the mid noughties, I’ve been touting it ad nauseum to anyone who wanted to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray Kurzweil should be paying me a commission. Ever since I stumbled across his Law of Accelerating Returns in New Scientist in the mid noughties, I’ve been touting it ad nauseum to anyone who wanted to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard W</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-27734</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-27734</guid>
		<description>Jordan - respectfully - did you read the whole essay? I agree with your criticism in a sense, in that we haven&#039;t yet established that there is a possible &quot;paradigm&quot; after integrated circuits. Pointing to the end of Moore&#039;s law and claiming their is nothing beyond that is no different than having someone circa 1956 claiming vacuum tubes are the fastest computers we can EVER make. Moore&#039;s law is projected to end sometime around 2018 - 2022. Ray is very aware of this, as he points out many times in his essay. Had his argument been of the form &quot;Moore&#039;s law --&gt; Singularity&quot; your counter argument would have been sufficient. This is not at all what he is arguing, in fact, the premise &quot;Moore&#039;s law will end&quot; is one premises of his argument (the rise an fall of new paradigms for intelligence). 

If you want to argue against a singularity occurring, you need to address the fundamental trends underlying Moore&#039;s law (things along the lines of building upon previous innovations and then work out what laws of physics may interfere with the continuation of that trend). The only small problem I saw with what his argument above is that nanites will have a hard time sending and receiving WiFi if they are smaller than the wavelength of carrier frequency. If I were to then conclude that this physical problem will prevent nanites from EVER using any kind of wireless communication, I would be adopting the same type of thinking as yours regarding Moore&#039;s law. 

All of us working together over many years of innovation and &quot;evolution&quot; have created this smooth pattern (I would argue that ALL people contribute in some small way, even the ones that don&#039;t appear to be doing anything - it all adds up). The patterns you see in a branching tree, in the periodic table, in human personality types, a fractal, the sand on the beach, a hurricane, the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction... take your pick but the &quot;Law of Accelerating Returns&quot; as Ray calls it is simply another one of those types of patterns. 

It&#039;s literally a force of nature - we recognize that we&#039;re creating that pattern, but then we delude ourselves into thinking that we&#039;re &quot;in control&quot; of it, and that just isn&#039;t the case. All of these large scale aggregate patterns constructed by an uncountable number of small scale chaotic events will be points of great interest for us going forward (they already are, but they&#039;ll become more important as we try to solve problems... like the end of Moore&#039;s law). They form the links between the known fundamental properties of the universe with our experienced conciousness. A top priority is to understand that complex and interconnected web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan &#8211; respectfully &#8211; did you read the whole essay? I agree with your criticism in a sense, in that we haven&#8217;t yet established that there is a possible &#8220;paradigm&#8221; after integrated circuits. Pointing to the end of Moore&#8217;s law and claiming their is nothing beyond that is no different than having someone circa 1956 claiming vacuum tubes are the fastest computers we can EVER make. Moore&#8217;s law is projected to end sometime around 2018 &#8211; 2022. Ray is very aware of this, as he points out many times in his essay. Had his argument been of the form &#8220;Moore&#8217;s law &#8211;&gt; Singularity&#8221; your counter argument would have been sufficient. This is not at all what he is arguing, in fact, the premise &#8220;Moore&#8217;s law will end&#8221; is one premises of his argument (the rise an fall of new paradigms for intelligence). </p>
<p>If you want to argue against a singularity occurring, you need to address the fundamental trends underlying Moore&#8217;s law (things along the lines of building upon previous innovations and then work out what laws of physics may interfere with the continuation of that trend). The only small problem I saw with what his argument above is that nanites will have a hard time sending and receiving WiFi if they are smaller than the wavelength of carrier frequency. If I were to then conclude that this physical problem will prevent nanites from EVER using any kind of wireless communication, I would be adopting the same type of thinking as yours regarding Moore&#8217;s law. </p>
<p>All of us working together over many years of innovation and &#8220;evolution&#8221; have created this smooth pattern (I would argue that ALL people contribute in some small way, even the ones that don&#8217;t appear to be doing anything &#8211; it all adds up). The patterns you see in a branching tree, in the periodic table, in human personality types, a fractal, the sand on the beach, a hurricane, the Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction&#8230; take your pick but the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns&#8221; as Ray calls it is simply another one of those types of patterns. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s literally a force of nature &#8211; we recognize that we&#8217;re creating that pattern, but then we delude ourselves into thinking that we&#8217;re &#8220;in control&#8221; of it, and that just isn&#8217;t the case. All of these large scale aggregate patterns constructed by an uncountable number of small scale chaotic events will be points of great interest for us going forward (they already are, but they&#8217;ll become more important as we try to solve problems&#8230; like the end of Moore&#8217;s law). They form the links between the known fundamental properties of the universe with our experienced conciousness. A top priority is to understand that complex and interconnected web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hickory</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-17658</link>
		<dc:creator>Hickory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17658</guid>
		<description>&quot;consciousness is an unbroken chain. if you copy yourself directly you break the chain, the new copy&#039;s consciousness would begin at that point and your old self would continue to be conscious.  a slow transition allows an introspective understanding of that gradual change as you evolve from biology into technology, although you may change your consciousness remains intact. that is my view anyway&quot;
-Eric Sartin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;consciousness is an unbroken chain. if you copy yourself directly you break the chain, the new copy&#8217;s consciousness would begin at that point and your old self would continue to be conscious.  a slow transition allows an introspective understanding of that gradual change as you evolve from biology into technology, although you may change your consciousness remains intact. that is my view anyway&#8221;<br />
-Eric Sartin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-14792</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14792</guid>
		<description>Jordan: in The Singularity Is Near book. Ray explains that Moore&#039;s law will expire in the future, and will be replaced by another process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan: in The Singularity Is Near book. Ray explains that Moore&#8217;s law will expire in the future, and will be replaced by another process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Ridgewell</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-14783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Ridgewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14783</guid>
		<description>Moore&#039;s law is just one of millions of positive feedback loops that occur in the world (in biology, sociology, economics, chemistry etc). Yet none of these feedback loops continue indefinitely, as you are assuming Moore&#039;s Law will. This is because every feedback loop, including Moore&#039;s Law, eventually has limiting factors (Usually a lack of resources / ingredients). All the technology curves will be slowed by limiting factors eventually, and the singularity won&#039;t occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moore&#8217;s law is just one of millions of positive feedback loops that occur in the world (in biology, sociology, economics, chemistry etc). Yet none of these feedback loops continue indefinitely, as you are assuming Moore&#8217;s Law will. This is because every feedback loop, including Moore&#8217;s Law, eventually has limiting factors (Usually a lack of resources / ingredients). All the technology curves will be slowed by limiting factors eventually, and the singularity won&#8217;t occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-14108</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14108</guid>
		<description>uuuuuuummmm, i was told i would recieve 40 trillion dollars....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuuuuuummmm, i was told i would recieve 40 trillion dollars&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoneMoon</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-9930</link>
		<dc:creator>GoneMoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9930</guid>
		<description>Hi to everyone, this is my first post, because I REALLY need help.  
  
Everywhere i see know this advertisements about Forex thing, got attracted, started to read about it, but still really confused about What is forex .   
All the explanations i find on the internet are very complicated. Too many smart words.  
  
Can someone explain what is forex by his own words ?  
Tired of websites.  
  
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi to everyone, this is my first post, because I REALLY need help.  </p>
<p>Everywhere i see know this advertisements about Forex thing, got attracted, started to read about it, but still really confused about What is forex .<br />
All the explanations i find on the internet are very complicated. Too many smart words.  </p>
<p>Can someone explain what is forex by his own words ?<br />
Tired of websites.  </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Glasses and the Rise of the Machines &#171; Curly &#38; Chic</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Glasses and the Rise of the Machines &#171; Curly &#38; Chic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>[...] theory hinges on what he calls The Law of Accelerating Returns, which points out that technological advancements have occurred  exponentially. Because we are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] theory hinges on what he calls The Law of Accelerating Returns, which points out that technological advancements have occurred  exponentially. Because we are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feeding Your Genes &#171; Mindful Medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-9125</link>
		<dc:creator>Feeding Your Genes &#171; Mindful Medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9125</guid>
		<description>[...] from this regarding specific dietary requirements. As technology continues to expand at exponential rates there is no doubt that it will be quick and easy to sequence your genome, and hopefully one day [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from this regarding specific dietary requirements. As technology continues to expand at exponential rates there is no doubt that it will be quick and easy to sequence your genome, and hopefully one day [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Past 5 Years of Technology &#124; Ixel Innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-9089</link>
		<dc:creator>The Past 5 Years of Technology &#124; Ixel Innovation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9089</guid>
		<description>[...] else we have ever seen. The crazy part is that technology continues to build on itself and grows exponentially. In 2010, there were 1.7 Billion people in the world connected to the Internet. Due to the growth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] else we have ever seen. The crazy part is that technology continues to build on itself and grows exponentially. In 2010, there were 1.7 Billion people in the world connected to the Internet. Due to the growth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cross &#187; Singularity University</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cross &#187; Singularity University</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8735</guid>
		<description>[...] Ray Kurzweil, the popularizer of the concept of singularity and the “Law of Accelerating Returns:”  This is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray Kurzweil, the popularizer of the concept of singularity and the “Law of Accelerating Returns:”  This is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Technology. Adapting Design. &#124; Erick Miller Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8647</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Technology. Adapting Design. &#124; Erick Miller Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8647</guid>
		<description>[...] advancements in modem technology as it reaches market stasis.  (read this article from KurzweilAI on the law of accelerating returns ) &#8212; the coolest thing to notice here is the way there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advancements in modem technology as it reaches market stasis.  (read this article from KurzweilAI on the law of accelerating returns ) &#8212; the coolest thing to notice here is the way there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extreme Supercomputing with Zettaflops</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>Extreme Supercomputing with Zettaflops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>[...] muscle. Is it worth going through all this hassle to approach this capability? Instead of the law of accelerating returns, it is more like the law of diminishing returns.The exascale research lab is tackling a few of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] muscle. Is it worth going through all this hassle to approach this capability? Instead of the law of accelerating returns, it is more like the law of diminishing returns.The exascale research lab is tackling a few of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robots will steal your job, but that&#8217;s okay: How to Survive the Coming &#8230; &#124; Bates Comp</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8467</link>
		<dc:creator>Robots will steal your job, but that&#8217;s okay: How to Survive the Coming &#8230; &#124; Bates Comp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8467</guid>
		<description>[...] Kurzweil notes that Moore&#8217;s Law was not the first to do so, but rather the fifth paradigm to provide accelerating price-performance. Computing devices have been consistently multiplying in power (per unit of time), from the mechanical calculating devices used in the 1890 U.S. Census, to Turing&#8217;s relay-based &#8220;Robinson&#8221; machine that cracked the Nazi enigma code, to the CBS vacuum tube computer that predicted the election of Eisenhower, to the transistor-based machines used in the first space launches, to the integrated-circuit-based personal computer which Kurzweil used to dictate the very essay that described this phenomenon in 2001. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kurzweil notes that Moore&#8217;s Law was not the first to do so, but rather the fifth paradigm to provide accelerating price-performance. Computing devices have been consistently multiplying in power (per unit of time), from the mechanical calculating devices used in the 1890 U.S. Census, to Turing&#8217;s relay-based &#8220;Robinson&#8221; machine that cracked the Nazi enigma code, to the CBS vacuum tube computer that predicted the election of Eisenhower, to the transistor-based machines used in the first space launches, to the integrated-circuit-based personal computer which Kurzweil used to dictate the very essay that described this phenomenon in 2001. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singularity University</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8461</link>
		<dc:creator>Singularity University</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8461</guid>
		<description>[...] Ray Kurzweil, the popularizer of the concept of singularity and the “Law of Accelerating Returns:” This is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray Kurzweil, the popularizer of the concept of singularity and the “Law of Accelerating Returns:” This is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Scientists Mapping the Connectome - Dynamic Patterns Research</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-8360</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Scientists Mapping the Connectome - Dynamic Patterns Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8360</guid>
		<description>[...] we will have to patiently wait for technological advances&#8211;although they are increasing at accelerating rates&#8211;to get us to the ability to efficiently map our personal connectomes. In the mean time, we do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we will have to patiently wait for technological advances&#8211;although they are increasing at accelerating rates&#8211;to get us to the ability to efficiently map our personal connectomes. In the mean time, we do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Intelligent Technology &#124; Things Nerds Like</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-2#comment-7682</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Intelligent Technology &#124; Things Nerds Like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7682</guid>
		<description>[...] Rise of the Machines, but with humans rising along with them, and ultimately into each other. In Kurzweil’s words: “My view is that despite our profound limitations of thought, constrained as we are today to a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rise of the Machines, but with humans rising along with them, and ultimately into each other. In Kurzweil’s words: “My view is that despite our profound limitations of thought, constrained as we are today to a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Кризис</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-7407</link>
		<dc:creator>Кризис</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7407</guid>
		<description>I just can not imagine with incredibly blog greatly that warned me! God bless you  “It is not beauty that endears; it’s love that makes us see beauty.” - Leo Tolstoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can not imagine with incredibly blog greatly that warned me! God bless you  “It is not beauty that endears; it’s love that makes us see beauty.” &#8211; Leo Tolstoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning Without Frontiers 2012 Day One &#124; Playing to Learn</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-7359</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Without Frontiers 2012 Day One &#124; Playing to Learn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7359</guid>
		<description>[...] of The Singularity University is on stage. Here&#8217;s his Website. Here&#8217;s Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns. The main topic throughout his talk was exponential growth in education, technology, biology, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of The Singularity University is on stage. Here&#8217;s his Website. Here&#8217;s Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns. The main topic throughout his talk was exponential growth in education, technology, biology, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The self-driving car: what will robotic vehicles do to jobs? &#171; Peter Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-7151</link>
		<dc:creator>The self-driving car: what will robotic vehicles do to jobs? &#171; Peter Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7151</guid>
		<description>[...] you like future tech, check out my novel Accelerating Returns.&#160; The Law of Accelerating Returns states that technology in the coming century will be so “rapid and profound it represents a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you like future tech, check out my novel Accelerating Returns.&#160; The Law of Accelerating Returns states that technology in the coming century will be so “rapid and profound it represents a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bird Flu and Science Fiction &#171; Peter Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-7147</link>
		<dc:creator>Bird Flu and Science Fiction &#171; Peter Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7147</guid>
		<description>[...] you like future tech, check out my novel Accelerating Returns.&#160; The Law of Accelerating Returns states that technology in the coming century will be so “rapid and profound it represents a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you like future tech, check out my novel Accelerating Returns.&#160; The Law of Accelerating Returns states that technology in the coming century will be so “rapid and profound it represents a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future &#8211; Knowledge Integration? &#171; Ribbon Research</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future &#8211; Knowledge Integration? &#171; Ribbon Research</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>[...] technology changes and evolves at an almost exponential rate we are looking into a future that is more or less unknown. It is thought that most university [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology changes and evolves at an almost exponential rate we are looking into a future that is more or less unknown. It is thought that most university [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artificial Intelligence Smarter than Humans &#8211; It&#8217;s Coming &#124; Hey It&#039;s Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>Artificial Intelligence Smarter than Humans &#8211; It&#8217;s Coming &#124; Hey It&#039;s Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>[...] if you really want to have your mind blown, this article will do the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you really want to have your mind blown, this article will do the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Magnificent Science Company Manifesto &#171; magnificentscience</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>The Magnificent Science Company Manifesto &#171; magnificentscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>[...] Our manifesto- we reject the concept of reductionism, short-term thinking, small ideas, the separation of art &amp; science &amp; embrace The Arts &amp; The Singularity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Our manifesto- we reject the concept of reductionism, short-term thinking, small ideas, the separation of art &amp; science &amp; embrace The Arts &amp; The Singularity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some principles for innovation units at creative agencies &#171; williamnicholls.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>Some principles for innovation units at creative agencies &#171; williamnicholls.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5380</guid>
		<description>[...] complicated chart shows just that. Futurologist and computing expert Ray Kurzweil predicts that by the 2020’s the computing power available for $1000 will be equivalent to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complicated chart shows just that. Futurologist and computing expert Ray Kurzweil predicts that by the 2020’s the computing power available for $1000 will be equivalent to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Accelerating Returns: On The Weightlifting Singularity &#124; The Iron Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law of Accelerating Returns: On The Weightlifting Singularity &#124; The Iron Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>[...] According to Kurzweil: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to Kurzweil: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singularity Summit 2011 Part II – Artificial Intelligence and the Brain &#171; Darin R. McClure &#8211; The Good Life In San Clemente</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5328</link>
		<dc:creator>Singularity Summit 2011 Part II – Artificial Intelligence and the Brain &#171; Darin R. McClure &#8211; The Good Life In San Clemente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5328</guid>
		<description>[...] counterpoint to Allen’s article is that Allen spends his time disputing Kurzweil’s article (The Law of Accelerating Returns) from 2001, admitting that he hasn’t read the much more detailed and comprehensive book “The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] counterpoint to Allen’s article is that Allen spends his time disputing Kurzweil’s article (The Law of Accelerating Returns) from 2001, admitting that he hasn’t read the much more detailed and comprehensive book “The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singularity Summit 2011 – A State of the Future &#171; Darin R. McClure &#8211; The Good Life In San Clemente</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>Singularity Summit 2011 – A State of the Future &#171; Darin R. McClure &#8211; The Good Life In San Clemente</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>[...] counterpoint to Allen’s article is that Allen spends his time disputing Kurzweil’s article (The Law of Accelerating Returns) from 2001, admitting that he hasn’t read the much more detailed and comprehensive book “The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] counterpoint to Allen’s article is that Allen spends his time disputing Kurzweil’s article (The Law of Accelerating Returns) from 2001, admitting that he hasn’t read the much more detailed and comprehensive book “The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accelerating Returns now available in Kindle and Paperback &#171; Peter Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5278</link>
		<dc:creator>Accelerating Returns now available in Kindle and Paperback &#171; Peter Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5278</guid>
		<description>[...] by Ray Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns, Bill Joy&#8217;s Why the Future Doesn&#8217;t Need Us, and Hugo de Garis&#8217; The Coming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Ray Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns, Bill Joy&#8217;s Why the Future Doesn&#8217;t Need Us, and Hugo de Garis&#8217; The Coming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilo Arcaya&#187; Ambiente &#187; Kurzweil Responds: Don’t Underestimate the Singularity</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5266</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilo Arcaya&#187; Ambiente &#187; Kurzweil Responds: Don’t Underestimate the Singularity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5266</guid>
		<description>[...] that he has not actually read the book. His only citation is to an essay I wrote in 2001 (“The Law of Accelerating Returns“) and his article does not acknowledge or respond to arguments I actually make in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he has not actually read the book. His only citation is to an essay I wrote in 2001 (“The Law of Accelerating Returns“) and his article does not acknowledge or respond to arguments I actually make in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurzweil Responds: Don&#8217;t Underestimate the Singularity &#124; KurzweilAI</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurzweil Responds: Don&#8217;t Underestimate the Singularity &#124; KurzweilAI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>[...] that he has not actually read the book. His only citation is to an essay I wrote in 2001 (&#8220;The Law of Accelerating Returns&#8220;) and his article does not acknowledge or respond to arguments I actually make in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that he has not actually read the book. His only citation is to an essay I wrote in 2001 (&#8220;The Law of Accelerating Returns&#8220;) and his article does not acknowledge or respond to arguments I actually make in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The future of technology- impossible to predict?Nerd Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5181</link>
		<dc:creator>The future of technology- impossible to predict?Nerd Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5181</guid>
		<description>[...] accelerates another, which accelerates another and so on. This idea comes from Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns and he explains it better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accelerates another, which accelerates another and so on. This idea comes from Kurzweil&#8217;s Law of Accelerating Returns and he explains it better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technoverse Blog &#124; What You Missed at Singularity Summit 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>Technoverse Blog &#124; What You Missed at Singularity Summit 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5158</guid>
		<description>[...]  The Law of Accelerating Returns (kurzweilai.net)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  The Law of Accelerating Returns (kurzweilai.net)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Technology Rewrites Our Mental Architecture &#171; Alex Yant</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5146</link>
		<dc:creator>New Technology Rewrites Our Mental Architecture &#171; Alex Yant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 04:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5146</guid>
		<description>[...] change is exponentially increasing, and will continue to do so into the future. (Read his post here). In a separate study, Kurtzweil also hypothesized that singularity, the &#8220;hypothetical future [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] change is exponentially increasing, and will continue to do so into the future. (Read his post here). In a separate study, Kurtzweil also hypothesized that singularity, the &#8220;hypothetical future [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camilo Arcaya&#187; Ambiente &#187; Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn&#8217;t Near</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5136</link>
		<dc:creator>Camilo Arcaya&#187; Ambiente &#187; Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn&#8217;t Near</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5136</guid>
		<description>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accelerating Returns, a technothriller, now available in paperback! &#171; Peter Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>Accelerating Returns, a technothriller, now available in paperback! &#171; Peter Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>[...] by Ray Kurzweil’s Law of Accelerating Returns, Bill Joy’s Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us, and Hugo de Garis’ The Coming Artilect War. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Ray Kurzweil’s Law of Accelerating Returns, Bill Joy’s Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us, and Hugo de Garis’ The Coming Artilect War. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How does military spending effect the country? &#171; Military Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>How does military spending effect the country? &#171; Military Budget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns" rel="nofollow">http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Singularity? Decades away. The Zombie Apocalypse? Much closer! &#171; Anguished Repose</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5062</link>
		<dc:creator>The Singularity? Decades away. The Zombie Apocalypse? Much closer! &#171; Anguished Repose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5062</guid>
		<description>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes that: So we won&#8217;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century—it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes that: So we won&#8217;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century—it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn't Near</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5036</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn't Near</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5036</guid>
		<description>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes that: So we won&#8217;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century—it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes that: So we won&#8217;t experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century—it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog &#8211; Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn&#8217;t Near &#171; News Hub Today</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns/comment-page-1#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#8211; Paul Allen: The Singularity Isn&#8217;t Near &#171; News Hub Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increasing capability, but is in fact exponentially accelerating—what Kurzweil calls the &#8220;Law of Accelerating Returns.&#8221; He writes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
