<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mind and How to Build One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one</link>
	<description>Accelerating Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:06:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granola</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one/comment-page-1#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Granola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=97302#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Luckily, it&#039;s a lot easier to reverse-engineer something than it is to understand it. We&#039;ve already been doing it for a while with smaller regions of the brain, as Kurzweil has noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily, it&#8217;s a lot easier to reverse-engineer something than it is to understand it. We&#8217;ve already been doing it for a while with smaller regions of the brain, as Kurzweil has noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melajara</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one/comment-page-1#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>melajara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=97302#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s start by fully reverse engineer tiny brains with circa 100&#039;000 neurons but brains nevertheless capable of amazing feats (e.g. bees who solve everyday &#039;on the fly&#039; an equivalent of the salesman travelling problem, i.e. the optimized order of flowers visitation to spare their tiny resources). Think of it that way, the humble bees seemingly suggesting that actually P = NP !

By the way, the true power and capability of a single neuron is grossly underestimated IMHO, and so is the implicit computational power of chemical pathways among neurons (neurotransmitters). It&#039;s even possible that some form of quantum computation is harnessed at some infra level of neural activity, unravelling incredible hidden powers.

Remember, for ancient engineers, the brain was like a complex set of connected clepsydra, then cogs, then an electrical switchboard and now most proponents of strong AI are still thinking the &quot;wetware&quot; would be in principle reducible (emulated) in purely electrical &quot;neural nets&quot;. But each age is revealling a new order of complexity with implicit computations performed herein. The current view, even Kurzweil&#039;s one, is very probably still way too much simplist.  

I&#039;m still longing for a functionalist computational equivalent  of a fly brain. Let&#039;s do it before attacking the bigger version we are endowed with!

Unfortunately, we are still very very far from understanding the true capability of a bee brain. 

At the root of evil, again and again,  hubris and over confidence in the possible achievements of a too reductionist epistemology...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s start by fully reverse engineer tiny brains with circa 100&#8217;000 neurons but brains nevertheless capable of amazing feats (e.g. bees who solve everyday &#8216;on the fly&#8217; an equivalent of the salesman travelling problem, i.e. the optimized order of flowers visitation to spare their tiny resources). Think of it that way, the humble bees seemingly suggesting that actually P = NP !</p>
<p>By the way, the true power and capability of a single neuron is grossly underestimated IMHO, and so is the implicit computational power of chemical pathways among neurons (neurotransmitters). It&#8217;s even possible that some form of quantum computation is harnessed at some infra level of neural activity, unravelling incredible hidden powers.</p>
<p>Remember, for ancient engineers, the brain was like a complex set of connected clepsydra, then cogs, then an electrical switchboard and now most proponents of strong AI are still thinking the &#8220;wetware&#8221; would be in principle reducible (emulated) in purely electrical &#8220;neural nets&#8221;. But each age is revealling a new order of complexity with implicit computations performed herein. The current view, even Kurzweil&#8217;s one, is very probably still way too much simplist.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still longing for a functionalist computational equivalent  of a fly brain. Let&#8217;s do it before attacking the bigger version we are endowed with!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, we are still very very far from understanding the true capability of a bee brain. </p>
<p>At the root of evil, again and again,  hubris and over confidence in the possible achievements of a too reductionist epistemology&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragger2k</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one/comment-page-1#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>dragger2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=97302#comment-473</guid>
		<description>building a brain is NOT the equivalent of building a mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>building a brain is NOT the equivalent of building a mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kendall</title>
		<link>http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-mind-and-how-to-build-one/comment-page-1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>kendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=97302#comment-427</guid>
		<description>How long til the book is available?  Psyched about it.  And will it be available in the ibookstore or on the kindle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long til the book is available?  Psyched about it.  And will it be available in the ibookstore or on the kindle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
