The Reality of ESP: A Physicist’s Proof of Psychic Abilities
May 21, 2012
- Author:
- Russell Targ
- Publisher:
- Quest Books (3/27/2012)
Amazon | On February 4, 1974, members of the Symbionese Liberation Army kidnapped nineteen-year-old newspaper heiress Patricia Hearst from her Berkeley, California apartment. Desperate to find her, the police called physicist Russell Targ and Pat Price, a psychic retired police commissioner. As Price turned the pages of the police mug book filled with hundreds of photos, suddenly he pointed to one of them and announced, “That’s the ringleader.” The man was Donald DeFreeze, who was indeed subsequently so identified. Price also described the type and location of the kidnap car, enabling the police to find it within minutes. That remarkable event is one reason Targ believes in ESP. Another occurred when his group made $120,000 by forecasting for nine weeks in a row the changes in the silver-commodity futures market.
As a scientist, Targ demands proof. His experience is based on two decades of investigations at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI), which he cofounded with physicist Harold Puthoff in 1972. This twenty-million dollar program launched during the Cold War was supported by the CIA, NASA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and Army and Air Force Intelligence. The experiments they conducted routinely presented results could have happened by chance less than once in a million. Targ describes four types of experiments:
1. Remote Viewing, in which a person describes places and events independent of space and time. For example, while in California Price drew to scale a Soviet weapons factory at Semipalitinsk with great accuracy later confirmed by Satellite photography. In another remote viewing, Targ accurately sketched an airport in San Andreas, Columbia himself.
2. Distant Mental Influence, where the thoughts of the experimenter can positively or negatively affect the physiology (heart rate, skin resistance, etc.) of a distant person.
3. Whole field isolation, where someone in a state of sensory isolation accurately describes the visual experiences of someone else in another place.
4. Precognition and retrocausality, showing that the future can affect the past. That is, the elephant you see on television in the morning can be the cause of your having dreamed about elephants the previous night.
Final chapters present evidence for survival after death; explain how ESP works based on the Buddhist/Hindu view of our selves as nonlocal, eternal awareness; discuss the ethics of exercising psychic abilities, and show us how to explore ESP ourselves. “I am convinced,” Targ says, “that most people can learn to move from their ordinary mind to one not obstructed by conventional barriers of space and time. Who would not want to try that?”
Comments (12)
by Scott Bryson
As usual the knee-jerk skeptics are ready to criticize without even looking into the background of the story. This man has impeccable credentials and work as a physicist besides his Stanford ESP research.
All you all so ignorant that you think you know more than Stanford Research Institute, the CIA and DOD, who dropped $25M on this work? If nothing this is a perfect demonstration of how ignorant skeptics can be of proper science that refutes their desperate grip on Old World science.
by Mr.X
@Scott Four things:
First: All you seem to have on your side are appeals to authority (a type of logical fallacy).It seems this is truly all you can say, while being rude and betraying your lack of manners at the same time. You believers can stay sheeples if you want but please refrain from urging others to do likewise.Or, at least, be polite about it.
Besides, no credential (which is a human invention) in the world will change “the laws of reality” by force of it’s authority.You can have tons of credentials and work within a domain, if you say sth that’s obviously incorrect, it is still incorrect.
Second: There is no such thing as Old World science.And despite what people like you, with only little knowledge of the big, wide world think… the fact remains that the “Old World” that you so much despise contributes at least as much to scientific progress as the new world and is more highly developed in general.
Third: You just believe what you want to belief.History shows that’s a bad guide… this should (usually) go without saying.
Fourth:If you can show the existence of such phenomena sceptics would believe in them.The way you use the word it is such a label for believers in order to avoid grappling with the inconvinient truths that may be inside the words of those who chose to be thinking for themselves and paying the prices you have to pay if you value truth and the solution of problems over sugarcoating reality.
But while showing sth to be true/likely you must adhere to some standards.Some easy thinking should show you why, and it would not harm you to do it yourself (instead of relying on others and a feeling of what you want to be true, nobody cares about these things anyway).
Ps:
There is no such thing as proper science, “improper science” is no science at all.That’s what makes science so different and effective.Necromancers like you should stick within the realm of their competencies.
by Bri
I don’t see how his comments are rude. You knew that I would likely respond to your post. At some point you will see the truth. I know you’ll rebuff my post. It doesn’t matter. It’s your opinion against mine. Every single day I get ample proof of the reslity of psi phenomena. In not so long a period of time you’ll see exactly what I mean. Till then your words will be wasted energy. I’m sorry and I apologize, I don’t mean to be rude. You are sadly mistaken. You have no idea what I do and unfortunately at this time I can’t be forthcoming. What I will demonstrate will settle this debate decisively and permanently. Till then i bid you a good day.
by Jack
It’s been awhile since I’ve come to this blog. Someone new is in charge. First you post something from prisonplanet, now this. Seriously? Will I see books on the latest science in communicating with aliens next? This baloney has nothing to do with Kurzweil’s work and the reason people are subscribed to this blog… Or am I wrong?
by Critic
Stuff like this shouldnt be posted on KurzweilAI.
by silentrage
Ridiculous comments like yours makes me question the capability of people to investigate and think for their goddam selves instead of just believing whatever they’re told.
by Dylan
Ridiculous content such as this makes me question the credibility of this website as a source for science and technology news.
by Ben S.
I foresee a day in my mind’s eye, in the not too distant future, when this book will be available for the Kindle.
by /:set\AI
those who still think Psi is ‘woo’ need to examine their
lives and their thinking- this is now mainstream science
with a huge body of peer-reviewed evidence that has
been more thoroughly vetted and checked than any
other set of experiments- so the last hold-outs who
questioned the experiments have to cease and desist-
why hold on to an irrational position against these
phenomena? there are no more arguments- we are
maturing past classical materialist mechanism to the
network dynamics of quantum information- this is
happening is ALL the sciences-
by None
Why is this on Kurzweil AI?
by silentrage
I agree with some of what you say, but you may also have to keep in mind that many experiments which are done very professionally as to deserve being published never do because of the sheer number of buttons they push in the science community.
by Titus Nachbauer
I must say I am very dissapointed you would publish an article like this. If the scientist mentioned did indeed publish any results from controled and repeatable experiments in a respectable peer reviewed journal, then point us to that article, but not to a book with mentions of individual positive (and therefore by definition cherry picked) cases. At least your summary makes it look like that.