The robot revolution is just beginning
April 26, 2012
Rodney Brooks’ “lips are sealed,” as The Economist put it last week, about what exactly he and Heartland Robotics are up to in a converted warehouse in South Boston’s Innovation District. But venture capitalists have already gambled $32 million on the premise that whatever it is they produce, it’s going to set a whole new direction in the field.
Rodney Brooks has just resigned as MIT’s Panasonic Professor of Robotics to be chairman and chief technology officer of Heartland Robotics. In robotics, “today’s technology is going to look so incredibly primitive in a couple of decades,” he said. .
Over the years, Brooks set up several companies; his first big success was one that became known as iRobot, which introduced the vacuum-cleaning robot called Roomba. The company also produces military robots that are widely used by U.S. forces to disarm explosives and explore dangerous areas.
Brooks’ latest concept for next-generation robots could, he thinks, revolutionize manufacturing. Instead of huge machines that need to be kept inside protective cages so they won’t injure nearby workers, he envisions smaller, nimbler, more responsive robots that could work alongside people, helping them with tasks. The new robots, he says, will compare to today’s lumbering industrial robots in much the way that an iPhone compares to an earlier, room-sized mainframe computer.
Brooks isn’t revealing anything yet about what his new robots will look like, or what they’ll be capable of doing. But based on his comments at MIT, don’t expect them to look much like people. “If you make them too humanlike, people’s expectations go up, and they’re easily disappointed,” he said. “You don’t want to make it look like Einstein!”

Comments (4)
by Scott
Here come all of the stupid and short-sighted “Hurr hurr… SKYNET! DUUUURRR!!!” comments that swarm in with EVERY article that has to do with robotics. Really, people? That’s all you can extrapolate from the potential of this technology? *sigh*
by GatorALLin
…skynet calling on line one for you (Hal 2000)
by Dan Foley
Will they have feelings? Should they? Being able to respond to feelings could be useful and perhaps economically viable. But what would be the advantage of an anxious or petulant robot? http://wfnt.com/robots-who-need-robots-are-the-luckiest-robots/
by John Doe
It isn’t hard to guess what it’s going to be. Just look at his video here
http://fora.tv/2009/05/30/Rodney_Brooks_Remaking_Manufacturing_With_Robotics
Two arms, various sensors, some decent spatial awareness software and some kind of bespoke programming solution to allow the various manufacturers to work seamlessly with human workers. Hopefully it’ll also make me a damn sandwich.
There won’t be any surprises but it will be neat.