The slower you grow, the longer you live
January 3, 2013

Stickleback fish (credit: GerardM/Ron Offermans/Wikimedia Commons)
New research from the University of Glasgow suggests that lifespan is affected by the rate at which bodies grow early in life: manipulating growth rates in stickleback fish can extend their lifespan by nearly a third or reduce it by 15 percent.
A team from the University’s Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine altered the growth rate of 240 fish by exposing them to brief cold or warm spells, which put them behind or ahead their normal growth schedule.
Once the environmental temperature was returned to normal, the fish got back on track by accelerating or slowing their growth accordingly. However, the change in growth rate also affected their rate of aging.
While the normal lifespan of sticklebacks is around two years, the slow-growth fish lived for more than 30 percent longer, with an average lifespan of nearly 1000 days. In contrast, the accelerated-growth fish had a lifespan that was 15% shorter than normal.
These effects occurred despite all fish reaching the same adult size, and were even stronger when the rate of growth was increased by artificially manipulating the length of daylight the fish were exposed to, “tricking” their bodies into growing faster to reach their target size before the start of the breeding season.
Professor Neil Metcalfe, who worked on the study, said: “The results of the study are striking. It appears that bodies which grow quickly accumulate greater tissue damage than those that grow more slowly and their lifespan is substantially reduced as a result. The study also demonstrates the surprising ways in which a slight change in environmental conditions in early life can have long-term consequences.
“These findings are likely to apply to many other species, including humans, since the manner in which organs and tissues grow and age is similar across very different kinds of animal. It has already been documented in humans, for example, that rapid growth in early childhood is associated with a greater risk of developing ailments later in life such as cardiovascular disease in middle or old age, possibly because of the way in which the tissues of a fast-grown heart are laid down.
Earlier attempts to test links between growth rates and lifespan by altering diet have been inconclusive, as results could be affected by the diet itself rather than its effect on growth. The Glasgow team avoided that problem by keeping the fish on identical diets; all that changed were the temperatures to which they were exposed.
Comments (9)
by rick
This sounds like a species-specific adaptation to a particular set of environmental conditions. Don’t look for direct human similarities, but potential signals we might have adapted to with our own evolutionary history. Or simply focus on the response mechanisms and forget about the environmental triggers.
by Jim Mooney
Hah, hobbits rule. They grow slower. All you tall guys with the foot of extra protoplasm that gets you higher executive pay no matter how dumb or inept you are, will die sooner.
by Mr.X
Hm.What about midgets!?Aren’t they “grown up” fairly early in their lives?
by josdorpjossie
Lucky me. In school I was always the smallest of the class, but I kept on growing till in my 20s and reached a normal size. I’ll let you guys know when I reach 100 years.
by eldras
I think we’re still up against highly complex bio stuff, needing supercomputing to simulate and intervene in it.
Why dont people from cold climates live longest?
by Oracle3
I was wondering just that eldras
by Jerry
I believe you’ll find that human’s don’t have the same link between environment and growth schedules for humans in cold climates to live longer.
Though a colder climate does reduce the need for oxygen, increasing your odds of surviving from oxygen-depriving conditions like heart attacks.
by George
This is interesting. I have always wondered why the few guys in my class who started shaving in the 7th grade looked so much older than most of my chronological peers later in life. Those guys were also bigger and stronger than most of us until well into high school. I realize this is anecdotal, but many of the women in my class who were not fully developed by high school graduation, were often very attractive at the 5 and 10 year reunions. Many of the high school beauties had aged at what appeared to be a faster rate than the late bloomers.
by Bri
I’ll have to remember to do this next time.