http://www.kurzweilai.net/transparent-graphene-based-material-could-revolutionize-wearable-electronics-solar-panels Accelerating Intelligence Tue, 21 May 2013 17:28:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 http://www.kurzweilai.net/transparent-graphene-based-material-could-revolutionize-wearable-electronics-solar-panels/comment-page-1#comment-14646 craigtown61 Fri, 04 May 2012 17:18:14 +0000 http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=149947#comment-14646 another example of evolutionary forces at work, as one resource becomes more expensive and looks like its running out another is invented to take its place with greater abundance and lower eventual cost. Buckey is still alive! Ephemeralization is still a viable law another example of evolutionary forces at work, as one resource becomes more expensive and looks like its running out another is invented to take its place with greater abundance and lower eventual cost. Buckey is still alive! Ephemeralization is still a viable law

]]> http://www.kurzweilai.net/transparent-graphene-based-material-could-revolutionize-wearable-electronics-solar-panels/comment-page-1#comment-14372 Editor Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:34:21 +0000 http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=149947#comment-14372 Trakk: see http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.201200489/abstract (linked from the Ref. at the bottom). Conductivity of GraphExeter (doped graphene) is not specified, except between ~ 90% to 95% transmittance, where it is about 2 to 3 times higher. I'm getting the full paper and will learn more. Trakk: see http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.201200489/abstract (linked from the Ref. at the bottom). Conductivity of GraphExeter (doped graphene) is not specified, except between ~ 90% to 95% transmittance, where it is about 2 to 3 times higher. I’m getting the full paper and will learn more.

]]> http://www.kurzweilai.net/transparent-graphene-based-material-could-revolutionize-wearable-electronics-solar-panels/comment-page-1#comment-14363 trakk Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:19:14 +0000 http://www.kurzweilai.net/?p=149947#comment-14363 How is it conductivity wise compared to ITO? How is it conductivity wise compared to ITO?

]]>