Warp drive may be more feasible than thought, scientists say
September 18, 2012

A ring-shaped warp drive device could transport a football-shape starship (center) to effective speeds 10 times faster than light (credit: Harold White)
A warp drive to achieve faster-than-light travel — a concept popularized in television’s Star Trek — may not be as unrealistic as once thought, according to scientists at the 100 Year Starship Symposium, Space.com reports.
A warp drive would manipulate space-time itself to move a starship, taking advantage of a loophole in the laws of physics that prevent anything from moving faster than light.
A concept for a real-life warp drive was suggested in 1994 by Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre; however, subsequent calculations found that such a device would require prohibitive amounts of energy.
Now physicists say that adjustments can be made to the proposed warp drive that would enable it to run on significantly less energy, potentially bringing the idea back from the realm of science fiction into science, according to Harold “Sonny” White of NASA’s Johnson Space Center.
Warping space-time
An Alcubierre warp drive would involve a football-shape spacecraft attached to a large ring encircling it. This ring, potentially made of exotic matter, would cause space-time to warp around the starship, creating a region of contracted space in front of it and expanded space behind.
Meanwhile, the starship itself would stay inside a bubble of flat space-time that wasn’t being warped at all.
With this concept, the spacecraft would be able to achieve an effective speed of about 10 times the speed of light, all without breaking the cosmic speed limit.
The only problem is, previous studies estimated the warp drive would require a minimum amount of energy about equal to the mass-energy of the planet Jupiter.
But recently White calculated what would happen if the shape of the ring encircling the spacecraft was adjusted into more of a rounded donut, as opposed to a flat ring. He found in that case, the warp drive could be powered by a mass-energy equivalent to that of a spacecraft like the Voyager 1 probe NASA launched in 1977.
Comments (35)
by daveb
So, what you’re saying is … if you take some kind of special material, idunno, maybe “metallic” and shape it so that is “Circular or elliptical in shape, flat on bottom and domed on top” maybe … it just … might … work?
http://www.roswellfiles.com/FOIA/twining.htm
by Graham Rounce
Would a very tiny one be possible, as a test?
by Hans Busse
Sounds like what Mr. Dyson did with the fan to accelerate air you can do with space, a neat concept.
by Ralph Dratman
Not sure we should burn up Jupiter for takeoff. And of course you would have to take another gas giant with you for the return trip. Do we really want huge empty spaces in the sky? I think we should hang onto these large objects. Someday they could become collectibles. Then we would be kicking ourselves for using them as firewood.
by rob falgiano
Nice!
by martinandsusie
Obviously you didn’t “get” the article. That was before some added calculations were done. Now, with a shape adjustment from an oval football shape to a more circular shape, the power needed to power this ship would be the equivilant to 2 Saturn V rockets. Or… was ya’ll just joshin’? :-)
by Jonny bubonic
Wouldn’t a bumper or maybe a snowplow on the front work?
by Comacine
“Exotic matter” commodity trading is about to go through the roof, get in now before it’s too late. Also, “powered by a mass about the size of Voyager” is a nonsense phrase. Power and mass are distinct concepts, author. This article does not belong on this site.
by Noahventure
E=MC^2
by cacarr
“powered by a mass about the size of Voyager”
A Voyager mass worth of energy, presumably.
by Editor
yes, fixed
by Tony
If you could turn the drive on and off rapidly( maybe 30 times a second) then you could see where you were going and navigate, to avoid stopping in middle of a star perhaps.
by Brad
10 times the speed of light isn’t fast enough to have to worry about hitting stars. The next closest star to the sun is about 4 light-years away. So at 10*C it would take about 5 months to get there. Also, you could speed off in any direction and there is almost no chance of ever hitting a star, even if you continued forever on to other galaxies. Space is very empty.
by Craigers
You forget the time contraction effect. to the people travelling on the ship time would contract, the time to the star for them would be much much faster then 5 months.
by star0
FTL can be used to violate the principle of causality. That should make people rather skeptical of this work.
by Bri
I wonder. If your traveling at ten times the speed of light and you hit a small black hole, would you pass through? ( Captain what as that? I don’t know! Why does everything look funny?)
by Nick
Although exciting and I would like to know more…it makes me think of the movie Event Horizon. What happens when you are in that area (whatever it is called) where time/space is going around you?
by tesla111
How would sensors work if you are traveling 10x light speed; Navigation would be impossible without Warp Sensors – a lot of exploding ships as Davery noted. A recent Kz article noted that scientists may have refuted the Heisenberg Princlple making ‘beaming’ & ‘replicators’ at least a possibility. It looks like we’ll have the computing power soon; so along with the actual tech for Warp we will also need Long-range Navigation Sensors, Shielding and some type of Weapons system. Ah ha: Star Trek!
by Gorden Russell
Remembering all those shows on Nova about rubber sheet physics makes one wonder how this ship comes up with all the gravity needed to warp time and space. Also, just what is in this “exotic matter”…unobtanium?
by Marcos Marin
“exotic matter” is the name we give to our ignorance of particle physics.
by Carl Brooks
exotic matter tends to be anti-matter. problem with anti matter it tends to want to annihilate itself with normal matter. BOOM
by GAUSS
“exotic matter tends to be anti-matter.” Not necessarily. In this case the engine would need to be made of negative matter, or matter with negative mass. There’s nothing absolute in physics to say that this can’t exact. There’s a potential slot for it, so to speak. A hint at this is observed via the Casimir effect, though negative pressure and negative mass may be completely unrelated.
Antimatter proved Dirac’s hint toward matter with opposite charge. Negative matter hasn’t quite been proposed yet that I know of. But again, there’s nothing to say it can’t exist. If it did exist, it would imply that its interaction with the Higgs field was the inverse of that of matter. Hence why discovering the Higgs boson and antimatter (officially) were necessary steps – soon we can begin exploring the possibility of particles experiencing a negative interaction with the Higgs field, or possibly obtaining negative mass through some other phenomenon.
by asiwel
Something that interacted inversely with the Higgs field would not necessarily be negative matter … it could be “meta-matter.” Pretty soon we would be discussing gravity-cloaks … which would be followed by anti-gravity.
by David
There is a LOT we don’t know about the natural world. Quantum theory can’t tell us how the classical world arises and there may be other large scale information worlds that are generated by it and can interact with gravity. It seems to me that the main problem is that our science is very poor at investigating phenomena that we don’t yet know how to repeat. There are many indicators that such interactions exist and could ultimately be used for space travel. On the bright side uk schools do now teach this (deficit) at the start of their physics courses – the existence of well documented and currently totally inexplicable phenomena. Also check out what is known and has been discovered about chi energy. Quite repeatable if you have 20 years to spare and the right teacher.
by Bri
@David: on You tube there are a few chi demonstrations. Can you direct us to any scientific research reports. There was a report on meditations effects on the brain on this website. It profoundly affected every structure and functioning, causing a tremendous amount of synchronization and strengthening of connectivity. From my own experiences I can tell you that the chakras exist. Focus on the heart center first. Once you get past the babbling brain you’ll find what is described as the hearts cave. In it you’ll feel the connectivity to things. Later you can explore the others.
by David
@Bri: Effie Chow eastwestqi might know of some. This was my point, science isn’t set up to look at such things, at least in an open way, publications are in obscure journals, but the physical effects are there all the same and if you are lucky you can sometimes get private demonstrations. How to get a warp drive? This is a speculative web page so… Abstract information and some form of unknown body energy seems to have a real existence and cause direct physical effects on the world, in rare situations. So the human body would have to be the initial research tool. The ancient Chinese developed this art quite successfully and physical effects are well known among serious meditators. I think this is possible, but rather than go into that one has to look at the consequences of knowing that information effects are a part of the natural universe. The inner world and personal development then takes on much more importance, and that would completely change our society, and probably much of the scientific outlook too.
by mikeymikemike
If you could somehow transport entangled particles that could some be used to send information (I know, currently impossible) so that communication could be instantaneous instead of waiting for information at light speed, we could be talking about true intergalactic communities that travel and communicate with each other. Fascinating to think about.
by Gorden Russell
That’s the way to go, mikeymikemike. An entangled-particle communicator is a must. When all the charted graph lines of technological progress go vertical in the year 2046, then somebody will see how it’s done.
by rob falgiano
Just before i got to mikey’s comment, that’s exactly what i was thinking. (no, really i was.) that you’d have to exploit entanglement somehow so that the travel is instantaneous. well actually, there’s no travel at all – you just ‘pop’ from one location to another by some quantum trick.
by Davery
Shame that any collision in the Oort cloud or any other spec of dust at those speeds would totally destroy the ship. Shielding?
by Gorden Russell
If space-time can really be warped, the ship would be safe in a bubble of normal space. Unseen space rocks would be surfed away by the bow wave of warped space-time. But it might be a good idea to make short jumps so you could scout out the course with powerful telescopes. Don’t want to run into a dark, rogue world along the way. But maybe while you’re in the bubble you would be out of the rest of space-time, so you could pass right through any obstacle. These scientists need to give us more information — especially about the exotic matter and just where does the gravity come from to warp all that space-time?
by Wisdo
No, the ship will not be “travelling” very fast at all , thats the beauty of it. Theres no acceleration (due to the warp field boost) so no “inertial dampners’ a la star trek are needed. Anything the ship encounters “along the way” enters the warp field and is only travelling at the real speed of the ship, not the warp boosted speed.
by Bri
Alpha centori wouldn’t be four light years away. It would be a little over four months!
by Gorden Russell
Yeah, Bri. I’ve wanted to know just what’s in the Alpha Centauri system since I was an eight-year-old kid. Even the red dwarf Alpha Centauri C could have a rocky little world in its habitable zone. The odds are against it, for a lot of reasons, but it’s not impossible. Still, stars A and B are closer in size to Sol, so they are the ones to bet on for a habitable planet.
by GAUSS
We’ll get there. It’ll take while, but we’ll get there.