What comes after the cloud? How about the fog?
February 11, 2013

(Credit: Rick Hyman/iStockphoto)
Startup Symform thinks it can provide better disaster resilience than even data centers hundreds of miles apart. And, says Bassam Tabbara, Symform cofounder and Chief Technical Officer, it can do that in a way that’s extremely cheap — and in some cases free — to its customers, Tekla Perry writes on IEEE Spectrum.
Tabbara describes Symform’s approach as a “decentralized, distributed, virtual, and crowd-sourced” cloud. .
Here’s how it works. Most of Symform’s customers act as hosts as well as customers, that is, they allocate some amount of their on-site storage for use by Symform.
Pricing depends on just how much storage they make available; if they allow twice as much data to be stored as they are uploading into the Symform fog, then their fog storage is free. (Otherwise, pricing is 15 cents per gigabyte per month.) This approach is similar to the SETI@home effort in which volunteers donate idle computer cycles to analyze radio data as part of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence; Symform asks customers to provide idle storage.
When a Symform customer uploads a file to the fog, Symform’s software replicates it for redundancy, shreds it into tiny pieces, encrypts each piece, and then distributes it to other Symform customers around the continent or multiple continents….
(More)
Comments (7)
by donjoe
So Freenet without the security, then.
by Haytham El Mardi
The question is why we need Sumform to store data on their cloud SERVERS if we can use the same model collectively and have reciprocal agreements between business partners. I mean if we have companies A and B then company A can upload data to B and reciprocally B will upload A and that is that. If the issue is trust then why trust company C?
I mean Symform make sense for transactional information on the run but for old gigantic backups.
by Aaron Wright
So, if I want to store 10 Gb of data in the cloud, I need to allow someone else to store 20 Gb on my computer for it to be free? That seems like a lot of storage space so I can back up my data. This business model is… questionable. Why would I pay for so much storage to back up someone else’s files?
by WLGJR
We all know that information is more important than money.
by David
Hi Aaron
The trick is distributed backup. If the data is important, you don’t want the backup saved in the same locale. Then, If a disaster occurs, nothing is lost. The free bit is secondary for people with precious data. And many have lots of open drive space on secondary servers.
This is somewhat like how torrents work in distributed file-sharing. But I’d want to test the system very thoroughly to ensure it’s reliable. Encrypting each packet and storing them randomly adds a lot of points for failure and many simpler backup systems fail in practice.
by hlampert
Love how they totally disregard bandwidth usage and cost considerations.
by mika69
Per month pricing is not the solution… ask Kim Dotcom