Who’s in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain
December 14, 2011
- Author:
- Michael S. Gazzaniga
- Publisher:
- Ecco (11/15/2011)
Amazon | The father of cognitive neuroscience and author of Human offers a provocative argument against the common belief that our lives are wholly determined by physical processes and we are therefore not responsible for our actions.
A powerful orthodoxy in the study of the brain has taken hold in recent years: Since physical laws govern the physical world and our own brains are part of that world, physical laws therefore govern our behavior and even our conscious selves. Free will is meaningless, goes the mantra; we live in a determined world.
Not so, argues the renowned neuroscientist Michael S. Gazzaniga in this thoughtful, provocative book based on his Gifford Lectures — one of the foremost lecture series in the world dealing with religion, science, and philosophy. Who’s in Charge? proposes that the mind, which is somehow generated by the physical processes of the brain, constrains the brain just as cars are constrained by the traffic they create. Writing with what Steven Pinker has called his trademark wit and lack of pretension, Gazzaniga shows how determinism immeasurably weakens our views of human responsibility; it allows a murderer to argue, in effect, It wasnt me who did it — it was my brain. Gazzaniga convincingly argues that even given the latest insights into the physical mechanisms of the mind, there is an undeniable human reality: We are responsible agents who should be held accountable for our actions, because responsibility is found in how people interact, not in brains.
An extraordinary book that ranges across neuroscience, psychology, ethics, and the law with a light touch but profound implications, Whos in Charge? is a lasting contribution from one of the leading thinkers of our time.

Comments (2)
by Tom Burroughes
This looks to be a very good book. I have read quite a lot on this subject lately after getting into a debate with a “hard determinist” who, no matter how many arguments provided for the existence of volition/free will, would just respond, “But it was determined”.
I would also suggest John Searle as one of the great defenders of free will. I remember reading Ray’s thoughts about him in The Singularity is Near.
Brgds
by NakedApe
Murderers are akin to deadly bacteria or viruses. We don’t question why these creatures kill us, we just try to eliminate them first. Humans who have not been sufficiently socialized by evolution into coexisting with their fellow humans in an altruistic fashion need to be eliminated from society just like those bugs. I feel badly that such dysfunctional humans exist but why belabour free will and determinism? I feel no remourse for eliminating such scum as Ted Bundy et al. from our society. Just make darn sure you’re not eliminating innocents through a flawed legal system. We also allow psychopaths to run whole countries and offer them all kinds of protection. Why do this? We allow millions to be tortured and murdered by the likes of Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and Kim Jong-Il. This is sheer foolishness on our part and it must change. If you need a driver’s license to drive a car, shouldn’t you have some legitimate credentials to run a country?