With evolved brains, robots creep closer to animal-like learning
February 7, 2013

Aracna (credit: Cornell University)
Get ready for four-legged bots of all shapes and sizes — and for all sorts of uses — that learn how to maneuver through landscapes with the grace of a cheetah, Fast Company reports.
The most nightmare-inducing characteristic of Big Dog, DARPA’s robotic military mule, might be the way it moves so stiffly, yet unrelentingly, over treacherous battleground. Turns out the repetitive mechanical gait that calls to mind some coming robopocalypse is also a huge headache for Big Dog’s makers — and lots of the big thinkers behind walking bots envisioned for everyday domestic use.
Units like Big Dog move so awkwardly because of their rudimentary brains, which require pre-programming for every little action. A four-legged walking bot could jump smoothly over rocks or weave through trees with the fluid grace and reflexes of a cheetah — if it only had a better brain. One that was more animal-like.
Thanks to breakthroughs in understanding how biological brains evolve, a team of robotic researchers say they’re close.
“We are working on evolving brains that can be downloaded onto a robot, wake up, and begin exploring their environment to figure out how to accomplish the high-level objectives we give them (e.g. avoid getting damaged, find recharging stations, locate survivors, pick up trash, etc.),” says Jeffrey Clune, Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of Wyoming, who is part of the robotics team. …
(More)
Comments (15)
by Cybernettr
I downloaded a screensaver like this once that was supposed to evolve more and more sophisticated behavior. The problem is that as time went on, the screensaver took longer and longer to invoke until finally it took 20 minutes, which kinda defeated the purpose of a screensaver. Never did get very evolved behavior from it.
by Stephen
Didn’t I see something similar 20 years ago.
by WLGJR
At least they have not lost it (the level of technology).
BTW I expected better, quality discussions on KurzweilAI.
by Alex
Spiders are terrifying, why are we using technology to create even more of them?
by Aaron
…And so begins the prelude to the Cylon War. That’s how it happened in the show, I believe; they made the robots smarter to increase efficiency while ignoring the fact that eventually they would ascend to a certain level of intelligence whereby they would stop being tools and at some point become sentient, self-aware beings.
by Bob Vasquez
So there I am protecting my home with my 100-round military-style assault weapon and a SWAT team surrounds my home (to get me, of course). The SWAT captain says, “okay, send in about 1000 robotic spiders, then, go get us some coffee. “He’ll come out.”
by Rob Fleming
As I said to the the ARPA program manager 30 years ago, “Mules, Clinton, Mules”. In 30 years they could have bred much smarter mules that do not have the terrible “tails to teeth” ratio that most military technology has.
by Roland
“Tails to teeth”ratio. What does that mean?
by ChrisF
Correct me if i’m wrong Bob, but I think it contrasts the cost of deploying and supporting a certain capability (the “tail”), to the benefit it actually delivers (or the damage it does – the “teeth”). Bigdog and it’s ilk are very cool, but imagine all the supporting tech that has to travel with it – plus all the servicing and tuning to keep it ready for battle.
by ChrisF
Rob not Bob – sorry !
by Daniel
Mules also require servicing, they need feeding and and care during periods of inactivity where a robot can be turned off and put into storage. Also, robots don’t poop.
by Gorden Russell
“Tails to teeth,” for mules in Missouri, that means, “one end kicks, the other end bites.”
by Jabbah
Here’s a link to the project home page with some videos:
http://creativemachines.cornell.edu/evolved-quadruped-gaits
by Bri
These guys could use some tree spider brains. I like how the robots look like they are dancing.
by BJ
Didn’t Rodney Brooks already develop neural net equipped mechanical bugs that learned to walk/skuttle better than this at MIT 20 years ago?