Your future smartphone and tablet will have 48 cores: Intel
November 2, 2012 by Amara D. Angelica
Intel researchers are working on a 48-core processor for smartphones and tablets — making them many times more powerful than today’s desktop computers within the next five to ten years, reports Computerworld.
Intel is distributing 100 of the experimental 48-core chips so researchers can work on the advanced parallel-computing programming models and software need to support these cores.
Intel says it’s using a prototype of a ”single-chip cloud computer” to develop the chip.
Adding cores to processors is a power-efficient way of boosting chip performance, instead of increasing CPU clock speed, which led to excessive heat dissipation and power consumption.
Intel CTO Justin Rattner said functions such as speech recognition and augmented reality will push the need for this kind of computational power.
“If we’re going to have this technology in five to 10 years, [the smartphone] won’t have just one camera,” said Enric Herrero, a research scientist at Intel Labs in Barcelona. “It would have two to three cameras that are always on. It could build a three-dimensional map of what it’s looking at and do object recognition.”
Smarter, faster cloud search
But can these functions be achieved with dedicated chips, better software, and tight cloud integration — instead of the humungous 25 to 125 Watts (two light bulbs!) needed, according to Intel — compared to less than ~5 Watts max with current cell phones?
Case in point: I’m impressed with the voice search feature in the just-released iOS/Android Google Search app upgrade, which blows away Siri in speed (I clocked it repeatedly at less than a second for Google searches on an iPhone 5), and with excellent voice recognition and voice quality (replacing Siri’s irritating robot voice).
Granted, it can’t access contacts and launch apps, like Siri, but for fast, intelligent searching, move over Siri: it will be Google voice search + Watson.
Examples of questions the Google Search app can answer (via Official Google blog):
- “What does Yankee Stadium look like?” Google will show you hundreds of pictures instantly.
- “Play me a trailer of the upcoming James Bond movie.” The trailer starts playing immediately right within Google Search.
- “When does daylight savings time end?” The answer will appear above the search results, so you can set your clock without having to click on a link.
- “Who’s in the cast of The Office?” See a complete cast list and find out who made you crack up last night.
Also, if we’re talking 10 years, we’re probably in post-silicon land, perhaps with intelligent low-power neurosynaptic chips based on carbon nanotubes or instant graphene devices on demand, powered by solar cells painted onto our devices or clothing.
Will power-gulping multiple cores still be relevant?

Comments (41)
by Tony
But from what I’ve been reading from the Investment folks is that the latest phones are data hungry, like crazy. Imagine your 2 gb data plan costs about $40, then imagine these new 4g LTE phones gobbling that up in about 32 minutes of data useage. And the new Iphone 5 is supposed to be hungrier than that. No wonder the bean counters have figured out that our communication devices are eating up a disproprtionate amount of our diposable income! And the greatest investment into that future is buying into the hardware infrastructure to keep powering that huge data useage!
by Strin
“I think there is a world market for maybe 5 chips with 1000 cores.”
by bodazyphir
grep |more !!!
by Vhan
Since this was happening back in 09, does this mean we’ll be seeing this in 2~7 more years!! Can only hope. Especially for augmented reality.
by Mr.Jade CADELINA
Why 48 cores? Why not one core equivalent to 100 cores and from a new wireless power source.
by nick
No one will ever need more than 640 cores
by Hugh Chatfield
I’ll get impressed when these devices can answer questions like:
What was the name of the fellow I met at ICAI’06 who presented the paper on autonomous robots – also bring up his paper?
Are there any references to my ICAI’06 paper on Searle’s Chinese Room thought experiment?
Explain to me how Cramer’s transactional theory interprets quantum mechanics.
Can you find any references to who the father of my mother was?
Show me the current James Bond Trailer indeed!!
by Pommodore 94
I read somewhere that my Galaxy S3 is quad core. But 48? wooow
by Glen Lincoln
48 cores? I have an iPhone, so how many cores do I have? One? Three? Ten? Give me a baseline so I can appreciate the substance of your metric. 48 cores is only a slight improvement if my iPhone already has, say, 42 cores.
by Editor
iPhone 4S and 5 have 2 cores
by Cybernettr
I knew when Apple released Siri it wouldn’t be long before other developers came out with their own superior versions. That’s the competitive nature of this incredible, exponentially advancing technology. Now watch for Apple to release its own greatly improved version, etc. Things are really picking up speed. Hang on, it’s going to be a wild ride!!!
by Matt
You can bet on the cloud being the number cruncher, with the 48+ cores doing local interface to analog world and digital infotainment ecosystem (home automation, shops, car info and nav, digital mindfullness). yeah … you heard it here first: Digital Mindfullness.
by Aaron
More likely that these will be SIMD cores. MIMD would use too much power and take up too much space on the die.
by Gorden Russell
Right, Aaron; when you have 48 cores in your phone, they can afford to be SIMD. Besides, they want the phones to be thinner and slimmer, so you have to be right.
by Vin
Hot on the heels of paralellia?
by GAUSS
It does seem that way, doesn’t it?
by Uri
desktop?
by Gorden Russell
Right, Uri. Three years ago I got an 8 GB HP. This year the most powerful I’ve seen is a 10 GB. By Moore’s Law, there should have been two doublings in this time. We should have a 32 GB desktop now. So what’s going on?
by GAUSS
8GB of RAM? If you’re talking about RAM, 32GB is not hard to get right now. You can pretty easily build a world-class workstation with 8 cores, 32GB RAM, and plenty of other goodies for like $1500-$2000. I’m presently building a workstation with 64GB of RAM and 12 cores, plus ports for FPGAs and two GPUs. It’s not hard to get this stuff. :)
by Gorden Russell
Well, what can I say? I’m just not as smart as you are, GAUSS. I don’t know how to build a computer. I’m just a tired old man who graduated with a degree in Public Communications. I don’t know how to build a computer. I can only buy one that comes in a box. Last time I was at the mall, the biggest they had on the shelf was an 8 GB. They did have a 10, but they had only one and then they sold it.
by GAUSS
Oh, I was merely pointing out the availability of the parts – no disrespect intended!
by Bri
Check out You tube Gordon. It’s really very easy. It costs a little more, but you have the flexibility to make a computer for your needs, and then upgrade it as needed.
by Cybernettr
My last iMac held a maximum of 4 GB of RAM. Four years later my current iMac maxes at 16 GB. That’s pretty much right in line with Moore’s law, capacity doubling every couple of years. In less than a year the new iMacs will be capable of holding 32 GB. Whoops! Edit: the new 27″ iMac will shortly be configurable to 16GB or 32GB
by Gorden Russell
That’s hot news, Cybernettr. Thanks.
by melajara
Gordon, you can find decent deals over eBay, see e.g.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313&_nkw=lenovo+w530+32&_sacat=0&_from=R40
(e.g. i73820 with 32GbRAM for less than $1’500)
I have 7 (yes, seven!) of those Thinkpads, all rock solid :)
by Robi5
What are you doing with seven W530 laptops, if you don’t mind asking?
by Robi5
Ah I see, I guess selling them :-)
by pt
Building computers is like grown-up legos, anyone can do it, especially with how easy they’ve made it these days (10+ years ago it was a bit more tedious and confusing). Guarantee you you can build one, just have to read a basic tutorial and you’d be good to go.
by Gorden Russell
By the way, GAUSS, since you know about these things, can you help me out? My monthly diagnostic passed on everything except for one thing. It gave me a warning on the Multicore Test. Do I have anything to worry about inside my processor?
by Matthew
I build my own computers also. Though never a computer that costs 2k!
Anyway, its likely the test you getting relates to computer performance. Why not instead look at how satisfied you are with your desktop rather than relying on a 3rd party metric? If you are satisifed, and the message relates to performance only, then do not worry.
An example message: “The processor might not have performed at optimal speed due to unknown reason(s). Please try running the test again when other applications are not running.”
by GAUSS
Matthew: Thanks for the answer.
Gorden: You probably don’t have anything to worry about, but if you’re really concerned about it we can discuss it. What program is running these tests?
by Gorden Russell
The HP monthly diagnostic ran the test.
by Giancarlo
Posted on I wish I had seen this how-to! I would have tried it also and I’m sure would have ended up the same.(What a year for Halloween disasters, never had so many msyelf actually.)Scary is the point though, huh?
by snake0
Desktop/tablet/smartphone have already started to merge. In the future they will probably be indistinguishable from one another apart from the size of the device and battery life.
by GAUSS
I’ll always prefer a beefy desktop for development, but tablets are kinda fun.
by snake0
If Cloud Computing really does keep improving, theoretically you could do your development on a tablet-like device (connected to monitor and keyboard of course) and have an Incredibuild type scenario where you connected to a free/low priced remote build server, which would give you the freedom to work anywhere, and a faster build than a single desktop.
by Gorden Russell
Say, snake0, when you say “development,” what are you talking about developing? Are you talking about CAD/CAM of new machines?
by GAUSS
A company I worked for explored this. Boss wrote an API using Sphinx to get speech input for coding on a Galaxy tablet, which was synchronized over a VPN to a remote test server much as you describe. It had kinks to work out, but the idea was nifty. We got tired of pounding away at keyboards in front of a rectangle all day, so we thought it’d be great to go program in the park using speech and a few gestures.
by Bri
The wave of the future. ” Computer on. Oh how quaint.”
by snake0
You’d sure get some weird looks if you audibly spoke programming code in the middle of a public park, that’s for sure.
by GAUSS
Haha yeah, but maybe people would get curious and wanna learn how to code! :)