Breakthrough nanoparticle halts multiple sclerosis, diabetes, allergies
November 20, 2012

Microparticle image (credit: Daniel R. Getts et al./Northwestern University)
Northwestern Medicine researchers have developed a biodegradable nanoparticle that stealthily delivers an antigen that tricks the immune system into stopping its attack on myelin and haltd a model of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in mice, according to new research.
The nanoparticles can also be applied to other immune-mediated diseases, including Type 1 diabetes, food allergies, and asthma.
In MS, the immune system attacks the myelin membrane that insulates nerves cells in the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerve. When the insulation is destroyed, electrical signals can’t be effectively conducted, resulting in symptoms that range from mild limb numbness to paralysis or blindness. About 80 percent of MS patients are diagnosed with the relapsing remitting form of the disease.
The nanoparticles do not suppress the entire immune system, as do current therapies for MS, which make patients more susceptible to everyday infections and higher rates of cancer. Rather, when the nanoparticles are attached to myelin antigens and injected into the mice, the immune system is reset to normal. The immune system stops recognizing myelin as an alien invader and halts its attack on it.
“This is a highly significant breakthrough in translational immunotherapy,” said Stephen Miller, a corresponding author of the study and the Judy Gugenheim Research Professor of Microbiology-Immunology at Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine. “The beauty of this new technology is it can be used in many immune-related diseases. We simply change the antigen that’s delivered.”
“The holy grail is to develop a therapy that is specific to the pathological immune response, in this case the body attacking myelin,” Miller added. “Our approach resets the immune system so it no longer attacks myelin, but leaves the function of the normal immune system intact.“
As effective as white blood cells
The nanoparticle was developed by Lonnie Shea, professor of chemical and biological engineering at Northwestern’s McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science.
The study’s method is the same approach now being tested in multiple sclerosis patients in a phase I/II clinical trial — with one key difference. The trial uses a patient’s own white blood cells — a costly and labor intensive procedure — to deliver the antigen. The purpose of the new study was to see if nanoparticles could be as effective as the white blood cells as delivery vehicles.
The nanoparticles are made from an easily produced and already FDA-approved substance, a polymer called Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG), which consists of lactic acid and glycolic acid, both natural metabolites in the human body. PLG is most commonly used for biodegradable sutures.
The fact that PLG is already FDA approved for other applications should facilitate translating the research to patients, Shea noted. The researchers tested nanoparticles of various sizes and discovered that 500 nanometers was most effective at modulating the immune response.
Nanoparticles have many advantages: they can be readily produced in a laboratory and standardized for manufacturing; and they would make the potential therapy cheaper and more accessible to a general population.
“We administered these particles to animals who have a disease very similar to relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and stopped it in its tracks,” Miller said. “We prevented any future relapses for up to 100 days, which is the equivalent of several years in the life of an MS patient.”
Study results
Shea and Miller also are currently testing the nanoparticles to treat Type one diabetes and airway diseases such as asthma. In the study, researchers attached myelin antigens to the nanoparticles and injected them intravenously into the mice. The particles entered the spleen, which filters the blood and helps the body dispose of aging and dying blood cells.
There, the particles were engulfed by macrophages, a type of immune cell, which then displayed the antigens on their cell surface. The immune system viewed the nanoparticles as ordinary dying blood cells and nothing to be concerned about. This created immune tolerance to the antigen by directly inhibiting the activity of myelin responsive T cells and by increasing the numbers of regulatory T cells, which further calmed the autoimmune response.
“The key here is that this antigen/particle-based approach to induction of tolerance is selective and targeted. Unlike generalized immunosuppression, which is the current therapy used for autoimmune diseases, this new process does not shut down the whole immune system,” said Christine Kelley, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering director of the division of Discovery Science and Technology at the National Institutes of Health, which supported the research.
The research is supported by a grant from the Myelin Repair Foundation and grants from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health and Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
Comments (23)
by pme
Great but wonder how long before it gets shelved by the industry..If this works and its cheap what happens to the 13 billion dollar MS drug industry? You dont think they will let that happen..Awesome how our taxpayer funded universities discover these things then hand off the the pharma industry and then we pay 50k a year for drugs that may or may not work
by jd
Amen! I have both MS and Type 1 diabetes and the drug companies have and are making a fortune off of people with these diseases. Once they find out that you need something to survive, it is very difficult for better alternatives to become available. I have had these diseases for 35 yrs now and I know that I have paid out a lot!
by Dr. Paul Blake, N.D.
It is funny how new discoveries look like the answer in the beginning like this one and then before long degrade down to something like this.
“Vioxx is perhaps one of the better examples of what can happen when a drug is manufactured and sold under false pretenses. It killed more than 60,000 people in just a few years time, before it was removed from the market. In the case of Vioxx, there are lingering questions about the soundness of the research backing the drug in the first place. Back in 2008, Dr. Joseph S. Ross of New York’s Mount Sinai School of Medicine came across ghostwritten research studies for Vioxx while reviewing documents related to lawsuits filed against Merck.”
“According to an April 16, 2008 article on MedHeadlinesiii”:
“In about 96 journal publications, Ross and his colleagues discovered internal Merck documents and e-mail messages pertaining to clinical study reports and review articles, some of which were developed by the company’s marketing department, not its scientific department. In others, there is little evidence that the authors recruited for the report made substantial contribution to the research itself. … Some of the authors listed in the Merck study reports of concern… question the true nature of ghostwriting. One neurologist originally listed as “External author?” and then listed as Dr. Leon J. Thal, of the University of California, San Diego in the final draft, died a year ago in an airplane crash.”
From Article: Why Your Doctor’s Advice May Be Fatally Flawed, July 12, 2012, Mercola
Doc Blake
by Vir Koul
Seems a significant development. Hope it succeeds human trials & acts as well in other immunodeficiency ailments like Crohn’s.
by JC
The power and simplicity of this is very amazing and a little alarming. Fiction writers can certainly imagine plots where a character brews up some of this and weakens his opponent’s immune reaction to some ubiquitous virus, just before some key encounter.
by Tim
My suggestion: THROW YOUR SUPPORT BEHIND THE MYELIN REPAIR FOUNDATION! I have been following their work and donating to them for several years and I am convinced that they are totally dedicated to getting treatments to the patients who need them. See for their approach and qualifications. I am very happy to note they are one of the financial supporters of the study and co-authors of the report. I think they are the perfect antidote to the many above comments expressing concern that big pharma is going to acquire this technology and bury it in their vaults to preserve their profits.
by melajara
Many comments here and elsewhere are expressing skepticism, if not discouragement, about the real availability of this treatment or other seemingly marvelous ones.
I’m myself a proponent of the cover up theory by big pharmas swallowing and burying fundamental advances to preserve their profits, the very process made possible by their powerful lobbies acting on FDA or Washington in order continue to milk the cow with captive “treatments” .
It’s about time for citizens to unite and oppose a counterpower to such depressing practices.
One step is to vote ONLY for political figures who will engage not to abide to those lobbies, this is tough.
But first step is to convince people that, indeed, there is an inadmissible cover up. Cases have to be monitored and evidence gathered as most of the news we are reading about here are over hyped, so where is the truth?
by JC
Would your campaign work best in countries where they have a single-payer government medical system? Since they would have the biggest cohesive group of people, all taxpayers, that will benefit from low-cost yet effective treatments.
by Ron Abate
Does this treatment merely stop progression of the disease in mice or does actually reverse (cure) the disease?
by Locke
This should be cheap to manufacture and have a wide range of applications. Plus if it is really biodegradable it should be approved for use soon.
Of course greed will override all that, and we either will never hear about this again (especially considering that treating diabetes is the bread and butter of the pharmaceutical industry) or it will be prohibitively expensive. Drug companies do not like effective treatments that last for years or lifetimes per dose.
Just look at the gene rewriting drug approved recently in Europe ( http://dvice.com/archives/2012/11/europe-approves-1.php ), which is a staggering $1.6million per dose. It makes you wonder why they chose a relatively obscure disease as the target of that drug, considering the techniques could be applied to every genetic disease out there.
by Steve
The autoimmune theory of aging is a programmed theory of aging that ascribes aging and cell death to preprogrammed decline in T-cell function with age, which causes decreased self/nonself recognition and increased development of infections, tumors, and autoimmune disorders.
If the the theory is correct, this treatment might extend way beyond curing diseases.
by Thomas Idzikowski
“We administered these particles to animals who have a disease very similar to relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and stopped it in its tracks,” Miller said. “We prevented any future relapses for up to 100 days, which is the equivalent of several years in the life of an MS patient.”
Is there any evidence logic like this actually applies? Can life spans in different animals actually be proportionately compared to determine efficacy of a treatment? Off the top of my head, I would think basal metabolic rate would be a better measure than proportion of life span..
Note: I’m all for this treatment being approved soon, just wanting to apply reasonable measures to estimate its effect and not give in to hyperbole.
by Hugh
I imagine they have studied disease models pretty well for these kinds of trials, surely they could see the rates of relapses in animals and compare them to human rates, thus giving an estimate of how long comparative disease time-scales are?
by egore
There should be some way for people to moniter something like this, so it does not get covered up, like so many other treatments have.
by graham caldwell
My niece has M/S how long before she can get this treatment i hope soon or is it going to be years away.
by Gorden Russell
“The nanoparticles can also be applied to other immune-mediated diseases, including Type 1 diabetes, food allergies, and asthma.”
Asthma? I’ve had asthma since infancy and not one doctor ever mentioned that it could be an auto-immune ailment. Now they tell me?
by ErikSMeyer
Gordon, I’ve also had extrinsic (allergy based) asthma my entire life… it’s unclear to me how that could be an automimmune disorder, it basically involves the body overreacting to the presence of some allergin (like ragweed) by constricting the airways, overproducing mucus in the lungs/etc. But I’m not a doctor… I’d be interested in seeing an explanation of that theory.
by Aaron
They said “other immune-mediated diseases”, not “other autoimmune diseases”.
by Francine Eisner, RN
Asthma certainly can have autoimmune components. You should read about the structure of the immune system, and the different kinds of immune system reactions, in a pathophysiology book. There is no way anyone can explain the human immune system in 3 sentences. It’s very, very complex. I recommend that you purchase a pathophysiology textbook that is 2 or 3 years old. It will not be inexpensive, as there are updated editions published quite frequently
by Francine Eisner, RN
You might read this, to start:
http://www.bio.davidson.edu/courses/immunology/students/spring2003/cubre/project2.html
by july pavone
could this also be used to stop inmunne responses in organ transplants?
by Bri
This technique will transform autoimmune disease treatment. Millions of people will have normal lives. Everyone should get behind this and push for it’s adoption. Billions of dollars would be saved.
by Vin
I agree, wow this is astounding. They actually reprogrammed the Immune system! The implications are mind-boggling.