Cheap, easy technique to snip DNA could revolutionize gene therapy
January 8, 2013

A simple, precise, and inexpensive method for cutting DNA to insert genes into human cells could transform genetic medicine, making routine what now are expensive, complicated and rare procedures for replacing defective genes to fix genetic disease or even cure AIDS.
Discovered last year, two new papers published last week in the journal Science Express demonstrate that the technique also works in human cells.
“The ability to modify specific elements of an organism’s genes has been essential to advance our understanding of biology, including human health,” said Jennifer Doudna, a professor of molecular and cell biology and of chemistry and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator at UC Berkeley.
“However, the techniques for making these modifications in animals and humans have been a huge bottleneck in both research and the development of human therapeutics. This is going to remove this bottleneck, because it means that essentially anybody can use this kind of genome editing or reprogramming to introduce genetic changes into mammalian or, quite likely, other eukaryotic systems.”
“I think this is going to be a real hit,” said George Church, professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and principal author of one of the Science Express papers. “There are going to be a lot of people practicing this method because it is easier and about 100 times more compact than other techniques.”
“Based on the feedback we’ve received, it’s possible that this technique will completely revolutionize genome engineering in animals and plants,” said Doudna, who also holds an appointment at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. “It’s easy to program and could potentially be as powerful as the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).”
The latter technique made it easy to generate millions of copies of small pieces of DNA and permanently altered biological research and medical genetics.
Two developments – zinc-finger nucleases and TALEN (Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases) proteins – have gotten a lot of attention recently, including being together named one of the top 10 scientific breakthroughs of 2012 by Science magazine. The magazine labeled them “cruise missiles” because both techniques allow researchers to home in on a particular part of a genome and snip the double-stranded DNA there and there only.
Researchers can use these methods to make two precise cuts to remove a piece of DNA and, if an alternative piece of DNA is supplied, the cell will plug it into the cut instead. In this way, doctors can excise a defective or mutated gene and replace it with a normal copy. Sangamo Biosciences, a clinical stage biospharmaceutical company, has already shown that replacing one specific gene in a person infected with HIV can make him or her resistant to AIDS.
Both the zinc finger and TALEN techniques require synthesizing a large new gene encoding a specific protein for each new site in the DNA that is to be changed. By contrast, the new technique uses a single protein that requires only a short RNA molecule to program it for site-specific DNA recognition, Doudna said.
In the new Science Express paper, Church compared the new technique, which involves an enzyme called Cas9, with the TALEN method for inserting a gene into a mammalian cell and found it five times more efficient.
“It (the Cas9-RNA complex) is easier to make than TALEN proteins, and it’s smaller,” making it easier to slip into cells and even to program hundreds of snips simultaneously, he said. The complex also has lower toxicity in mammalian cells than other techniques, he added.
“It’s too early to declare total victory” over TALENs and zinc-fingers, Church said, “but it looks promising.”
Based on the immune systems of bacteria
Doudna discovered the Cas9 enzyme while working on the immune system of bacteria that have evolved enzymes that cut DNA to defend themselves against viruses. These bacteria cut up viral DNA and stick pieces of it into their own DNA, from which they make RNA that binds and inactivates the viruses.
UC Berkeley professor of earth and planetary science Jill Banfield brought this unusual viral immune system to Doudna’s attention a few years ago, and Doudna became intrigued. Her research focuses on how cells use RNA (ribonucleic acids), which are essentially the working copies that cells make of the DNA in their genes.
Doudna and her team worked out the details of how the enzyme-RNA complex cuts DNA: the Cas9 protein assembles with two short lengths of RNA, and together the complex binds a very specific area of DNA determined by the RNA sequence. The scientists then simplified the system to work with only one piece of RNA and showed in the earlier Science paper that they could target and snip specific areas of bacterial DNA.
“The beauty of this compared to any of the other systems that have come along over the past few decades for doing genome engineering is that it uses a single enzyme,” Doudna said. “The enzyme doesn’t have to change for every site that you want to target – you simply have to reprogram it with a different RNA transcript, which is easy to design and implement.”
The three research shows this bacterial system works beautifully in human cells as well as in bacteria.
“Out of this somewhat obscure bacterial immune system comes a technology that has the potential to really transform the way that we work on and manipulate mammalian cells and other types of animal and plant cells,” Doudna said. “This is a poster child for the role of basic science in making fundamental discoveries that affect human health.”
Doudna’s work was sponsored by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
References:
- Martin Jinek et al., RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells, accepted for publication in eLife (open access PDF)
- Prashant Mali et al., RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9, Science Express, 2013, DOI: 10.1126/science.1232033
- Le Cong et al., Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems, Science Express, 2013, DOI:
Comments (13)
by Leo Allen
I’m a big fan of these scientists. They are true geniuses. Keep up the good work guys. Pretty soon all deseases will be cured, including aging. Capitalism and progress is great! Go faster, faster, faster!
by Alex
When do you think aging is going to be cured? What do you think the medical world will be like at the end of this decade, the end of the 2020s, and the end of the 2030s?
by eldras
Nope. Incremental stuff is going to be dwarfed by A.I.
But without SAI dont bank on a lot.
by JC
This could be the key to one step in Aubrey de Grey’s SENS rejuvenation technology. Snip in a section of DNA that overdrives the cell cleanup of ‘junk’ from living several decades. Then snip the original bit back in after the six month ‘cleanse program’ is complete.
by Bri
This one technique will change the face of medicine. Soon any malady will be reprogrammable. What even more exciting is the simplicity of the molecule. It should be relatively easy to print the from DNA printing machines. A tiny amount of material to affect the exact source of a disease process.
by The Man
Do you think that Lupus might be treatable soon, like before the end of this decade or the end of the next one? My sister has Lupus, and there’s been very little progress made in the treatment of the disease during her lifetime. The only real advance has been the prohibitively expensive Benlysta.
by Gorden Russell
“Doudna’s work was sponsored by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.”
Just think, Howard Hughes started his Medical Institute as a tax dodge and now it’s doing some of the most important work in the world.
I was surrounded by constant interruptions while trying to read this article. Did anybody notice if this procedure has to be done only on cells in a dish, or can it be done throughout your body? I’m sitting here gasping from COPD that sprang from being an asthmatic surrounded by a smokers in the workplace. I’d sure like an inhaler that could snip out my defective lung genes and replace them with the genes of an Olympic swimming medalist — but without the marijuana, of course.
by Luzarius
Why take out the best park GR?
by Luzarius
oops part not park… too much MJ!
by PedroC.
In vitro only, at the moment.
In vivo gene therapy still needs an appropriate vector. This method uses smaller molecules, so liposomes could be used, but they have the disadvantage of being non-discriminatory and very localized to the injection site.
Nevertheless, this is a VERY important breakthrough. Zinc-fingers were not developed properly due to Sangamo’s greed and completely unethical patents (as is the case in biotech’s ridiculously all-encompassing patents).
by Bri
Treatments for things like asthma will be soon on the way! That wasn’t a bong he was smoking, it was a musical instrument.
by Mr.X
Who smokes musical instruments? A former drug-dealer gone jazz player?
by Luzarius
Why smoke when you can vaporize?!? ;)