Extend your life span without dieting!
October 18, 2012 by Amara D. Angelica

Want double fries with that Big Mac? No prob — just ask for a side order of FGF21! (Credit: McDonald’s)
Woo hoo!
UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers have found that a starvation hormone markedly extends life span in mice without the need for calorie restriction.
Yes! I am sooo ready. I’ve waited years to have fries!
Restricting food intake has been shown to extend lifespan in several different kinds of animals. But in the UT study, the researchers found transgenic mice that produced more of the hormone fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) got the benefits of dieting without having to limit their food intake.
Male mice that overproduced the hormone had about a 30 percent increase in average life span and female mice had about a 40 percent increase in average life span,” said senior author Dr. Steven Kliewer, professor of molecular biology and pharmacology.
Yeah, yeah, but where can I get some of that FGF21? Let’s get to the point here!
The study published online in eLife — a new peer-reviewed, open access journal — defined average life span as the point at which half the members of a given test group remained alive. A study to determine differences in maximum life span is ongoing: While none of the untreated mice lived longer than about 3 years, some of the female mice that overproduced FGF21 were still alive at nearly 4 years, the researchers report.
FGF21, a hormone secreted by the liver during fasting that helps the body adapt to starvation, seems to provide its health benefits by increasing insulin sensitivity and blocking the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway. When too abundant, growth hormone can contribute to insulin resistance, cancer, and other diseases, the researchers said.
“Prolonged overproduction of the hormone FGF21 causes mice to live extraordinary long lives without requiring a decrease in food intake. It mimics the health benefits of dieting without having to diet,” said co-author Dr. David Mangelsdorf, chairman of pharmacology and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) investigator at UT Southwestern.
“Aging and aging-related diseases represent an increasing burden on modern society. Drugs that slow the aging process would be very desirable. These findings raise the possibility of a hormone therapy to extend life span,” said Dr. Mangelsdorf, who runs a research laboratory with Dr. Kliewer. They first identified FGF21’s starvation-fighting effects in a 2007 study.
OK, shoot me up, doc!
Lead author Dr. Yuan Zhang, an instructor of pharmacology, said the study was considered risky because all involved understood it would be at least two years — an average mouse life span — before there would be any evidence of whether elevated production of FGF21 would affect longevity.
Two years??!! I was planning to have a happy meal this afternoon!
Previous research has found that FGF21 can reduce weight in obese mice. The mice that overproduced FGF21 in this latest study were lean throughout their lives and remained lean even while eating slightly more than the wild-type mice, the researchers said.
The hormone does have some downsides: FGF21 overproducers tended to be smaller than wild-type mice and the female mice were infertile. While FGF21 overproducers had significantly lower bone density than wild-type mice, the FGF21-abundant mice exhibited no ill effects from the reduced bone density and remained active into old age without any broken bones, the researchers said.
Huh? Can’t they fix that?
“FGF21 is not affecting their mobility. These guys are spry. They live nice, long lives,” Dr. Kliewer said. “But the decreased bone density and female infertility will require additional research to determine if it is possible to separate out the hormone’s life span-extending effects from its effect on bone,” he added.
Wait, you mean this only works for mice?
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Robert A. Welch Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust,and the HHMI.
Comments (43)
by user
I think all this drug will do is tell your body that you’re starving and your body will react by slowing everything down to conserver energy. In turn all your ogans will have less work to do and they will not wear out as fast.
If you read studies relating to metabolic rate and life span, a person or animal with a faster metabolism will die younger than one with a slower metabolism.
by Matt
Science aside, the idea of ‘helping’ people in the first world glut themselves without consequence while many, many people die of starvation – REAL starvation – goes beyond irony to some place of terminal self-obsession I find pretty horrific. But hey, I guess that’s human behaviour.
by Ben
Combine this with the venus project and you will be getting somewhere. For all those who question this re the financial aspect, please check out the venus project and see how locked your minds are into the current system.
Free your minds…
by hey
can you please remove the mcdonald’s add ?
by Glen
Calorie restriction is not something that works in human. They have been barking up this tree for years and they’re not going to get results from it. Humans are naturally long lived and this kind of therapy would have a highly marginal effect. These scientists are looking for a quick simple fix that just isn’t there. If you want to live longer you’ll have to invest in the science that actually repairs the damage ageing causes e.g. SENS.
by Ron @ Wire EDM Machine
@ Mooney: I agree. Whats the point. I’ll live my life like a rockstar and die happy and young.
by someday69
So with this study,now public..Maybe it will,spur’more research into’this,,trouble’tree,,,,Mean’while,,excersize’eat’right’and”fast”’often,,,
by Jim Mooney
1) The global economy collapses and we live in the dystopian world of Mad Max.
2) The Singularity arrives and we all become robots.
Where is the advantage in living long?
by Gabriel
“Where is the advantage in living long”…..you know, it’s questions like that which just blow my mind and make it difficult to answer >_<
You may as well be asking where is the advantage in living, period – in which case, like your two "examples", you have two options: Life, or death?
by A4i
It is not just living longer. The best part is living healthier. Most of us spent half of our income on medical treatment for some health related issues. If I have the opportunity to live with healthy teeth , without spending stupendous amount of money for dental care and enduring agonizing pain for a long time, why not?
by scott
Then just die early, then! Like anyone else cares. No one’s forcing anyone to live longer. Never heard anyone actually complaining about the prospect of an extended lifespan. People even bitch about LIVING LONGER! Jesus Larry Christ…
by Eli
I’m down to live forever. Make me a cyborg now.
by mjblake
If that’s your thought process, you may as well end it right now. Meanwhile, those of us with some optimism about the future will continue to hope they solve the age problem.
by Jim Mooney
Extending your life span 5 years by starving yourself elicits the same comment I use when someone orders decaffeinated coffee: “What’s the point?”
by John
My eight year old son and I have only been using Ten Minute Trainer for a week and a half and we are both seeing results. My sister said this is the first time she has seen my waistline since my C-section and two hernia surgeries. This is very exciting for me. I wasn’t sure it was possible! My son has shown progress, too. He is a big and tall 8 year old, weighing in at 85 pounds. We did this workout together to keep him in shape in between baseball season and football season. Check out http://www.fatlossfactoring.com/10-minute-trainer to try it out!
by Jim Mooney
Nah, Russian Kettlebells are the secret. And you can sing the Volga Boatmen song while you’re using them.
by Mr.X
Well, kettlebells are really good.But in general, I’d just adjust my diet.
Btw: As far as I know these kettlebells aren’t really from Russia, but frome these batlic states neighboring (^^) it.But they’ve been made popular in the west by Russians.
by Bri
It’s all about physical activity. If you become sedentary, your body will store excess food. It thinks it’s a time of reduced resources, such as winter or drought. If your very active, the body stays lean for greater mobility. It thinks it’s a time of plenty, and of activities such as hunting and home building. Trying to diet only will make you fight the bodies hormones. You’ll be allways hungry, and the body will put on everything it can get out of what you eat.
by Mr.X
@Bri: Well, I guarantee you that you can get lean by diet alone.I have done it several times myself.You’re grossly oversimplyfing the body, and use the word diet in it’s colloquial sense (forgive this tone).I, by diet, mean the way you eat, all the time.
I have never seen anyone getting in any physical shape just by moving around a bit.
In fact, I’m pretty lean right now, though, granted, I also train.
I eat lowcarb (70-150 carbs for me), sometimes less, sometimes more- no need to force myself- most of the carbs from lowcarb bread and nuts, some treats- the rest high fat high protein food).I also have one refeed day, all-you-want to eat.2-3 liters of water.
Now you may say this only works when you’re young, but I helped a 70 year old family-member to lose 25 pounds.If you have a small frame that’s a big difference.Just check it out.
If you want an additional source I only have this dubios site at hand, and I don’t assume you’d buy books just because I say they support my arguments.
Ignore the informal tone and pseudoscience bits, if they bother you:
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/2_ways_to_lose_fat_only_1_way_to_get_ripped&cr=
by Travis
I smell sometihing fishy…. a person in the reference listed as (RONALD M. evens)!!!
very interesting.
by PacRim Jim
Lucky mice!
by Dirk Bruere
I can has chhezeburger
by mickey
Stop experimenting on defenceless rodents just to get a grant.
by Editor
Um, OK, would you like to volunteer?
by Toby
The point of animal testing is that it’s necessary if you ever want to get past the “cells in a petri dish” stage, but don’t want to instantly be giving potentially dangerous things to humans.
You can’t halt research entirely, as these advances improve quality of life for human beings.
So you’re left with the option of either being dangerously unethical to humans or rats. Take your pick.
by tim the realist
It looks like this effect has been researched since 1960 ?
by tim the realist
http://www.jbc.org/content/235/7/2134.full.pdf
by tim the realist
everyone knows that larger humans generally do not live as long as smaller humans. Has anyone measured FGF21 levels in people and correlated statistics across populations for size, fertility, and longevity? this seems like a simple experiment and analysis, without having to commence a long term study.
by Jim Mooney
Yeah, go to any hospital and see the people dying of TB, AIDS, and Cancer. They’re all Skinny. Hah! Being skinny is Deadly. (There may be some flawed statistics in there but I just had three beers and can’t cipher them.)
by user
This depends on what you consider “larger”. Yes, obese people will get diseases and die younger, but people that are considered fat by todays standars do not have to be overweight. Studies have shown that people with slower metabolisms live longer than people with fast metabolisms.
I think a faster metabolism keeps your body working harder an puts more strain on everything like running an engine at higher rpm’s all the time.
by sholy
Now we can all live longer – and collect social security longer – and run up the
national deficit faster – and go over the economic cliff sooner – maybe we had
better put a “top secret” classification on this FGF stuff and forget about it !!
by Mr.X
@Sholy: Hey.Maybe.Well.If you’re healty -which is a necessity in most age-related interventions- you can go work.The system just needs some adjustment.
by Travis
the foundtion must be laid before the roof is in place.
by SpiritShout
Pork Rinds with Cholula sauce….mmmmmmmm…
by SpiritShout
It sounds like it is tricking the body into thinking that its fasting. Now all we need is a counter gene to thicken the bone mass….or not.
by Mr.X
Sadly, this discovery comes too late.When you’re all robots/Ais/oneHivemind/Mr.Kurzweil (aka satan2030) by tommorow, you won’t need to eat.
But well, at least these western-cannibals have less to worry about when they devour their rich food right now.
by clains
Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21).
Science.
by Bruce Wright
It’s well-known that starvation will reduce fertility, and this might well be part of the mechanism. I wonder however if some of these effects might be caused by genes that are genetically linked to the one responsible for overproducing the FGF21 hormone.
Even if it does cause infertility, if it’s using the same mechanism as what causes infertility during periods of starvation, there’s a simple enough fix: Go off the hormone while you try to conceive. It’s hardly as if human females spend their entire adult lives trying to produce as many babies as possible – unlike some animals (mice, for example).
by snake0
You can still get a happy meal, just throw out the fries and keep the toy.
by Mr.X
@ Snake: You’re right, unless it’s fried it won’t contain too many calories.
by Chrispium
Umm! deep-fried plastic.
by infinitos
I read the title > made a meal with more contents > read the article > got tricked :P
by Editor
That’ll learn ya.