Heated nanotubes kill cancer stem cells
February 10, 2012
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center researchers have shown that injecting multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) into breast cancer tumors and heating them with a quick, 30-second laser treatment can kill them.
The results of their first effort involving kidney tumors was published in 2009, but now they’ve directed the science at breast cancer tumors — specifically, the tumor-initiating cancer stem cells. These stem cells are hard to kill because they don’t divide very often; and many anti-cancer strategies are directed at killing the cells that divide frequently.
The research is a result of a collaborative effort between Wake Forest School of Medicine, the Wake Forest University Center for Nanotechnology and Molecular Materials, and Rice University. Lead investigator and professor of biochemistry Suzy V. Torti, Ph.D., of Wake Forest Baptist, said the breast cancer stem cells tend to be resistant to drugs and radiotherapy, so targeting these particular cells is of great interest in the scientific community.
“They are tough. These are cells that don’t divide very often. They just sort of sit there, but when they receive some sort of trigger — and that’s not really well understood — it’s believed they can migrate to other sites and start a metastasis somewhere else,” Torti explained. “Heat-based cancer treatments represent a promising approach for the clinical management of cancers, including breast cancer.”
Non-invasively heating nanotubes
Using a mouse model, the researchers injected tumors containing breast cancer stem cells with nanotubes, which are very small tubes made of carbon, then exposed the nanotubes to laser-generated, near-infrared radiation to make them vibrate and produce heat.
This combination can produce a local region in the tumor that is very hot, she said. Using this method, the group was able to stop the growth of tumors that were largely composed of breast cancer stem cells. This suggests that nanotube-mediated thermal treatment can eliminate both the differentiated cells that constitute the bulk of the tumor and the cancer stem cells that drive tumor growth and recurrence.
“To truly cure a cancer, you have to get rid of the entire tumor, including the small population of cancer stem cells that could give rise to metastasis,” Torti said. “There’s more research to be done. We’re looking at five to 10 years of more study and development. But what this study shows is that all that effort may be worth it; it gives us a direction to go for a cure.”
Ref.: Andrew R. Burke, et al., The resistance of breast cancer stem cells to conventional hyperthermia and their sensitivity to nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy, Biomaterials, 2012; 33 (10): 2961 [DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.052]
Comments (2)
by Alex
Arent MWCNTs very carcinogenic?…
using carbon nanotubes for curing cancer seems unrealistic … but then again i work in materials science
by Bennie Beaver
For years I continue to read about breaking new on cancer research, often, reporting that in maybe 3-5 yrs. we could have an answer for cancer. I’ve heard of many breakthoughs in nanotechnologies from RNA, viral, chemical, heat therapy nanobots. I read about a heat therapy nanobot breakthrought from Hall University some months ago.
I understand it’s a complicated research area, but it’s beginning to sound like old reports of how flat screen televisions would be on the market very soon. It took yrs. They said robot for the home would be on the market very soon. It hasn’t happened yet! I believe it will soon.
The question is: When will all those different researchers get together and get something on the market. I go to my doctor and nothing is different. It’s that same old doctor’s office.
At the same time, I feel that those researchers much be waiting for some technology that will make them more money. I mean. What would they do if they really did cure cancer and a host of other diseases? They’d go broke. They wouldn’t have any more patients. How would they keep their funding, and jobs? Is that what going on! I want to believe that that those researchers are truly altrusitic, and I don’t particularly have proof that they’re not.
As an older individual with no particular health issues, I wish that all those researchers would get together and pick a therapy and do something for the people, waiting, and waiting, and dying.
If this is just one of those misconceptions from the public, then what is the truth? Otherwise, I’m very appreciative of all the good work in science and discovery, and wish the best for all of you.
For all those sincere scientist out there, keep up the good work. Just be more clear when breakthroughs will arrive in the doctors office. And someone get together and come up with three or four best possibilities and let’s have a Manhattan Project.