Italy elects first transhumanist MP
August 26, 2012 by Giulio Prisco
A transhumanist congressman? In Italy? Seriously?
Yes. In July, Italy — ironically, a stronghold of the Catholic Church — became the first major Western nation to elect an active transhumanist.
Giuseppe Vatinno, a member of the Italian Parliament, ran on a platform of “politics that strive to improve the human condition, making use of appropriate advanced technologies.”
And not a moment too soon, as Italy slides dangerously toward bankruptcy and urgently needs a new direction.
How did this happen?
Transhumanism1 — the idea that we can radically change ourselves by merging with technology — already had a precedent in Italy: former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi invested in MolMed, which aims to raise average life expectancy to 120 years and beyond — perhaps to continue ruling until that age? And transhumanism was already present in the work of the Futurist movement of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, which had an important influence in Italian politics in the first half of the 20th century, and is explicitly transhumanist in its modern revival.
But it took someone more dedicated to the cause. Vatinno’s influential Il transumanesimo. Una nuova filosofia per l’uomo del XXI secolo (Transhumanism. A new philosophy for the man of the XXI century) has helped counter some of the cultural hostility to transhumanism, which is especially evident in Italy. (See video at 00:45.)
A graduate of the University La Sapienza in Rome in theoretical physics and specialized in particle physics, cognitive psychology, neural networks, and image processing, Vatinno teaches in the Masters program on energy and environmental issues at the Politecnico in Milan and the University La Sapienza in Rome.
As a member of the Parliamentary Commission for Environment and Public Works, Vatinno brings his futurist vision to policy making, especially in the energy sector.
He also credits the Italian Transhumanist Association (AIT), the Italian chapter of Humanity+, through its magazine Divenire (Becoming) for promoting transhumanist ideas in Italy. (Full disclosure: I have known Giuseppe for many years, and I serve with him on the Board of Directors of the AIT.)
A transnational movement
But Vatinno doesn’t see transhumanism limited to Italy. “I think transhumanism has the strength of a transnational movement,” he says, offering these tips:
- Support your arguments by a clear logical framework, based on the principle of cause-effect, and backed by data and forecasting models.
- Propose technological and scientific solutions. ”For example, I believe that the environmental problem, an ‘existential risk,’ can be basically solved by advanced technology, combining the Proactionary Principle of the extropian philosopher Max More with sustainability, in a perspective that could be called ‘Tecnogaianism.’”
- Explain science. “The reactions of people during the election campaign, after explaining things, was always positive.” (Here’s where being a journalist and a writer helped Vatinno.) “But the scientists, the ‘lords of technology,’ must understand that sometimes they need to talk to ordinary people — explain and discuss — because only then we can hope to achieve a political consensus, crucial to real social change.”
“Transhumanism is a revolutionary philosophy, which tends to subvert old values, and create new ones,” says Vatinno. ” This is what useful technologies do: they just win, and that’s it.”
Transhumanism is a class of philosophies that seek to guide us towards a posthuman condition. Transhumanism shares many elements of humanism, including a respect for reason and science, a commitment to progress, and a valuing of human (or transhuman) existence in this life rather than in some supernatural “afterlife.” Transhumanism differs from humanism in recognizing and anticipating the radical alterations in the nature and possibilities of our lives resulting from various sciences and technologies such as neuroscience, neuropharmacology, life extension, nanotechnology, artificial ultraintelligence, and space habitation, combined with a rational philosophy and value system. — Max More



Comments (29)
by Mr.X
Concerning the title of his book: Is transhumanism really that new?
I think traces of it have been around almost as long as mankind.
by Edwin Masters
Sounds like a chicken, looks like a chicken, taste like a chicken, I mean religion! Except they’ll give you paradise here through they’re magic powers! Everything has led to this way, don’t you see! Then your too stupid, behind the times or something else. eventually the things will be embarassed to even have the word Human. If words are even part of their communication at all! Sorry, but I haven’t given up on us! I’m not afraid of Death! It’s just a part of existance. When we become our tools, we will no longer be special due to the finiteness of life. Stars die, what’s wrong with that? Pax! EAM
by Giulio Prisco
New Scientist | Meet the world’s first transhumanist politician
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528826.100-meet-the-worlds-first-transhumanist-politician.html
by Sean Henderson
Wish him the best. I think we’ll be seeing alot more focus on Transhumanist related research and biotechnological rights.
by Giulio Prisco
Well, politicians are constrained by many things, especially public support. When WE, the people in the street, will vocally and actively support transhumanist related research and biotechnological rights, politicians will follow en masse.
In the meantime, there are encouraging signs. As you can see from Giuseppe’s comment below, politicians read KurzweilAI, which is good! Of course, we must keep working and reaching out to the public, the voters.
by Mr.X
Maybe he just keeps track of the things that are said about him.It is not that hard to do.For a politician, that would actually make sense;)
by Giuseppe Vatinno
Thank you for yours nice words and a particular greeting to Amara Graps.
I’ll try to do my best.
Giuseppe Vatinno
Rome, Italy
by beppe
Is not so ironical that this happens in Italy, where Leonardo Da Vinci tried to build a flying machine. And, I think, religious fanaticism is more widespread in the United States rather than in Italy…
by Mr.x
I totally agree with your comment.
by EQ
As do I.
by srgg67
Me too :)
by Tom Mooney
Brilliant idea! This is the type of positive,incisive thinking necessary to make”indefinite life extension a reality”.
by melajara
I’m very happy such a man won a public political mandate. In the mean time the head of Swiss confederation Mrs Evy Widmer-Schlumpf issued her support for the project of taxing oil in order to bill the consumer CHF 5.- per liter ( this roughly equates to $20 a gallon). Not now of course but in 2050!!!
One has to applaud the Swiss authorities for such foresight. On the other hand one has to lament for the total lack of imagination or recognition of the expectable contribution from science and technology in solving the impending energy crisis (notwithstanding the potential occurrence of the “Singularity” before 2050).
This is so typical of the current crop of politicians so devoid of genuine vision. Yet another example of the blindness to the nonlinearity of technological progress Ray is so often denouncing.
The average public and his representing authorities still fall short of true appreciation of this phenomenon and are backing under ambitious claims for the possible achievements in 2050.
Note that there are blaring counterexamples. Considering Neil Armstrong achievement in 1969, it is such a pity that there is, 43 years ahead, nobody and no installation on the moon now.
John F. Kennedy would be ashamed!
by Giulio Prisco
Well, a Futurist government (see other comments on Futurism) would have established a permanent Moonbase in the 70s. Too bad that the strident clang of metal, loved by Futurists, would not be heard on the surface of the Moon out of the base.
Many politicians have nothing against vision, it is just that they love power and cash more. Unpopular causes don’t attract voters. It is _our_ fault that we have fallen out of love with space. If we loved space like in the 60s, politicians would love it too.
by melajara
It is indeed lack of foresight as Nixon dropped the Apollo project because at this stage it was clear that U.S.A. had won the “race”.
What race? Just a childish pretense at space mastery by planting a national flag on the moon.
Yet another stupid phallocratic egomaniac demonstration of the real rubbish motivations driving this achievement.
It would have been time to grow up by preparing for a permanent base, but no, nothing then and nothing now.
by Amara Graps
I’m surprised by this news. I have strong memories of the upheavals triggered by and around Vatinno in the Italian transhumanist community.
by Andrew Gibson
“All politicians are rubbish! This one is different though! Until he becomes rubbish.” Transhumanist tribalism is still tribalism, and anti-democratic nonsense to boot.
by melajara
Democracy by itself is not a very valuable political regime. Besides “Power by the people and for the people”, certain and essential supplemental conditions have to be met to ensure its value.
(Re)read Plato Republic for a convincing elaboration ;-)
by peteni.
The real issue for humans is the fact we are a diversifying species attempting to survive in a finite space. Loose groupings, each attempting to solve the confusion of persistence feel threatened by other groups solutions generating natural funnels of direction (diversity!). It’s what got us here in the first place. The two principles we should use to ensure something of our creativity is propogated into the future are ‘respect”; we are non of us ‘sacred’, however beautiful we are,your idea is as valid as mine even if I don’t agree with it and ‘frankness’, the human skill of self-deceit is our greatest accomplishment, we need to open up the conversation by clearly separating the fairy stories from the future stories.
by Khannea Suntzu
Hey I think I met the guy while I was in Milan.
by Bri
What happened to no personal attacks?
by Editor
Post deleted. We do not have an automated process yet for deleting these.
by Vin
He sounds better than the usual type of politician, but I must admit results are important too. But I’d probably vote for him over every politician and peer in the current English government who are well trapped in mediaevalism and myth it seems most times. I guess, energy resourcing is a balancing act but perhaps tipping over more to alternative to oil with each increase in tech. When that happens, it is probably best to have a tech and science savvy politician about to explain in rational terms …erm .. why the government, as typical, isn’t backing it :D.
by Bri
I agree. Most of our politicians seem in the dark, as to what is happening in relation to the singularity and tech in general. Hard to govern well with ones eyes shut.
by Mr.x
Italy has an history of enamouredness with technology.From the ancient engineering feats of the Roman Empire to the inventions of the renaissance and fascism’s steel monsters, Italy has often been at the forefront of technological developments.Fascism, for example, thought the time was come to exhange weak humans for migthy machines on the battlefield, leading to some (at that time) very advanced technologies but badly schooled soldiers.
Since that could be controversial on here I qoute from wiki: “Mussolini’s use of systematic propaganda to pass on simple slogans such as “believe, obey, fight” and his exploitation of the radio developed under the influence of Italian Futurism. Futurism was an intellectual movement which forcefully emphasized three main ideas: technology, speed, and violence.
@Gibson: In the moment in which you call other forms of groupbuilding than yours tribalism you yourself are engaging in it.Identifiyng as member of one group does not exclude the membership of an rather abstract “human/all group”.This tribalism charge often comes from people who grew up in “immigration countries”, who should neither take themselves to be representative for humanity as a whole nor for the pinnacle of civilization.Just look at your crime rates.
And anti-democratic does not nessecarily have to be something bad (I know, I am evil); for example pure democratic rule would often trample the rights of minorities.As for today, most people killed by foreign powers seem to be killed by self-styled democracies.
@James.Transhumanism advocates extreme intervention and changes in the human body, thus changing what’s build in god’s likeness.Back then, when christians had more might than today, even examination of dead bodies was forbidden.This hardly meshes with the pro-science,pro human point of view.
by Giulio Prisco
Re “Futurism was an intellectual movement which forcefully emphasized three main ideas: technology, speed, and violence.”
Futurism emphasized speed and technology. It also emphasized violence, in the sense of eliminating the old to make place for the new, but we should not forget that most ideologies promoted violence at that time, and most nations were at war all the time. So, I think the emphasis on violence was an incidental concession to the zeitgeist rather than a defining feature of Futurism. Today’s Italian Futurists, who claim Marinetti’s heritage (see link in the post), are peaceful and non-violent.
by Mr.x
I really agree with you, and in no way wanted to say that todays futurists are like that.Even the quote says:”Futurism was”.After all futurism is just a word and words often mean what the majority of people who care say they mean (talking just about communication as it is, not should be).Maybe I should have said it explicitly, but I thought the context would indicate that the quote was about a past historical movement, not a new one going under the same name.
I mentioned this past movement to give evidence to my claim/thought that technology seems to have been an important thing to the people who lived (and live, it seems) in what is modern day Italy.Even in times of dictatorship, which I think is rather remarkable. For all I know, most manifestations of dictatorship are anti-science/ change in their outlook because new technology and new insights can be destabilizing (e.g leading to change, thereby enhancing the probability of social change) and thus really have potential to get in the way of maximizing the payoff of leaders (they’d rather play it safe).This normaly leads to relative backwardness, something which, at least technological, was not the case in Italy.
Maybe this not being afraid of change, in general, was rooted in the fact that (Christianity aside) Rome/Italy was often very pluralistic.Many Gods, many non-Italian provinces, lots of different philosophy (e.g Greek influence), later many states with different allies outside Italy etc.It is also one of the younger nation states.
Of course, these are just some of my ideas after reading this Article, and I am not presumptious enough to try and “explain”/argue about Italy to an Italian.
Ps: It seems many proponents of transhumanism have an interdisciplinary background, by that I mean studied many different subjects to a deeper level.Something they have in common with past’s renaissance men.
by James McLean Ledford
This does not suprise me Christianity and Transhumanism are ULTIMATELY one and the same :) http://www.hyper-evolution.com
by melajara
I thought you would refer to Teilhard de Chardin and his cosmism as a preferred and collective path to God.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Teilhard_de_Chardin