Optogenetics illuminates pathways of motivation and depression through brain
November 20, 2012

Effects of stimulating the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (a) Optogenetic inhibition of nerve axons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), implicated in major depressive disorder (b) Fluorescence in the DRN detects effects. (Credit: Melissa R. Warden et al./Nature)
Karl Deisseroth, MD, PhD, a professor of bioengineering and of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University, and postdoctoral scholar Melissa Warden, PhD, have isolated the neurons that carry the split-second decisions to act, from the higher brain to the brain stem. In doing so, they have provided insight into the causes of severe brain disorders such as depression.
In organisms as complex as humans, the neural mechanisms that help answer the question, “Is it worth my effort?” can fail, leading to debilitating mental illnesses. Major depressive disorder, for instance, which affects nearly 20 percent of people at some point in life, is correlated with underperformance in the parts of the brain involved in motivation. But researchers have struggled to work out the exact cause and effect.
“It’s challenging because we do not have a fundamental understanding of the circuitry that controls this sort of behavioral pattern selection,” Deisseroth said. ”We don’t understand what the brain is doing wrong when these behaviors become dysfunctional, or even what the brain is supposed to be doing when things are working right. This is the level of the mystery we face in this field.”
Clinicians refer to this slowing down of motivation in depressed patients as “psychomotor retardation.” According to Deisseroth, who is also a practicing psychiatrist, patients may experience this symptom mentally, finding it hard to envision the positive results of an action, or, he said, they may feel physically heavy, like their limbs just do not want to move.
“This is one of the most debilitating aspects of depression, and motivation to take action is something that we can model in animals. That’s the exciting opportunity for us as researchers,” said Deisseroth, who also holds the D.H. Chen Professorship.
Light coercion
Psychiatrists, Deisseroth included, believe the will to act may be born in the prefrontal cortex — the foremost part of the brain that helps plan and coordinate action. It then zips through the brain as a series of electrical signals, passing from neuron to neuron along countless branching pathways until it reaches the nerves that directly implement movement. Until this study, however, it was not clear which of these pathways might control the willingness to meet challenges, or the anticipation that action might be worthwhile in a difficult situation.
To isolate these pathways relevant to depression, Deisseroth’s team needed to stimulate specific brain cells in rodents and observe changes in their behavior. They used optogenetics, a technique Deisseroth developed at Stanford in 2005, which has since revolutionized the fields of bioengineering and neuroscience.
Green algae produce a protein called channelrhodopsin that makes them sensitive to sunlight. Borrowing and engineering the gene for this protein, Deisseroth has been able to create neurons that respond to light delivered from fiber-optic cables. He can turn the neurons on and off by sending bursts of light to activate different areas of the brain and then observe the effects on behavior.
Working backward
Surprisingly, the researchers found that simply stimulating the prefrontal cortices of rodents didn’t motivate them to try any harder in a laboratory challenge. It turns out that motivation is not as simple as stimulating a region of the brain. Instead of one switch in the prefrontal cortex that turns motivation on, multiple switches work in concert. Some neurons excite motivated activity and others inhibit it. Broadly stimulating the executive part of the brain will not generate a simple effect on behavior.
“It’s one step more subtle,” said Deisseroth, “but this is something that optogenetics was very well-suited to resolve.”
An optogenetic method called projection targeting allowed the scientists to work backward from the brain stem and find the exact pathway from neurons in the prefrontal cortex that signal motivation.
The researchers first introduced their light-sensitive protein into cells in the prefrontal cortex. The light sensitivity then spread out like the branches of a tree through all the outgoing connections and eventually made its way to the brain stem, making those regions light sensitive, too.
Then, illuminating the newly light-sensitive regions of the brain stem thought to control motivational movement, Deisseroth and Warden watched the behavioral effects as a subgroup of neurons in the prefrontal cortex that sent connections to the brain stem were activated. They could see not only which cells are possibly involved in motivation, but the way motivation moves from one brain region to another.
Mapping motivation
The researchers suspected that one part of the brain stem in particular, the dorsal raphe nucleus, might be crucial to behaviors that control effort. This cluster of cells is a production hub for serotonin — a chemical messenger that changes the firing behavior of other cells. Serotonin is associated with mood modulation; many antidepressant drugs, for instance, may act by increasing serotonin concentration in the brain.
When the pathway between the prefrontal cortex and the dorsal raphe nucleus was stimulated, rodents facing a challenge in the lab showed an immediate and dramatic surge in motivation.
Curiously, however, when the rodents were relaxing in their home environment, the same stimulation had no effect. The pathway was not merely linked to any action, or to agitation; it was, more specifically, helping to “set the effort that the organism was willing to put forth to meet a challenge,” Deisseroth said.
Researchers were also able to produce the opposite effect — reduced effort in response to challenge — by stimulating prefrontal neurons that project to the lateral habenula, a region perched atop the brain stem that is thought to play a role in depression. When this region was getting signals driven optogenetically from the prefrontal cortex, rodents put forward less effort.
Insight into how motivation works
These findings are part of a larger puzzle that Deisseroth and his team have pieced together by using optogenetics to model human behavior in animal subjects. The work has already helped clinicians and researchers to better understand what is going on in a patient’s brain.
Connecting depressive symptoms with brain pathways may be helpful in the development of drugs, but according to Deisseroth, the most important part of this research is its insight into how motivation works in both depressed and healthy people.
He has observed that this insight alone can be helpful to those dealing with mental illness and seeking an explanation for troubling symptoms that feel deeply personal. For those patients, he said, simply knowing that a biological reality underlies their experience can be a motivational force in itself.
This research was supported by the Wiegers Family Fund, the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, a Stanford graduate fellowship, a Samsung scholarship, a Berry Foundation fellowship, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the U.S. Department of Defense, the Keck Foundation, the McKnight Foundation, the Yu, Snyder, Tarlton, and Woo Foundations, and the Gatsby Charitable Foundation.
The work was also supported by Stanford’s Department of Bioengineering, which is jointly operated by the School of Engineering and the School of Medicine.
References:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11617
Comments (12)
by lizardlabs
I read some of your post and I learned a lot of knowledge from it. Thanks for posting such interesting articles.
by marek pyka
“Then, illuminating the newly light-sensitive regions of the brain stem thought to control motivational movement, Deisseroth and Warden watched the behavioral effects as a subgroup of neurons in the prefrontal cortex that sent connections to the brain stem were activated. They could see not only which cells are possibly involved in motivation, but the way motivation moves from one brain region to another.”
I doubt that a cell is so simple that turning on some reaction to light is the same as doing something else the cell is capable of. Cells are complicated, and have many gates and channels, and cell activity is not uniform and designed to do the same things or triggered by all one mechanism…we cannot be so simplistic. Some are inhibitory and others excitatory, in the same cell. Some effects occur when a certain proportion of cells fire, or for a certain duration occurs, or cells with the proper interconnections are accumulated by signal, which can also differ by type of signal or mechanism.
by Bri
The implications of this type of research are far ranging. It is essential for an understanding of how human intelligence works. If we are to get robots to do things on their own, we will have to understand why we do them in the first place.. The same old issue of promise and peril looms large. It’s the same issue that is at the heart of UN oversight of the Internet. Once we can control a persons or robots motivation, what do we intend to do with it? Who should make those decisions? Who watches the watchmen? Hopefully it is us. That is the central idea of democracy. That the constituents educate themselves and engage the political system. Once we can control motivation, an individual or our government could send a robotic bee in through your window , and alter who you are. We need to engage in a much more thurough discussion of morals and ethics, and how these relate to everyone. Especially our governments. Honestly I don’t think that discussion will take place. Who watches the watchmen? I’m very Jungian. I believe in the collective unconsciousness. The answer was in Ozzy”s office. I had one that was very similiar. Mine didn’t have a makeup palette commemorating tha unification of the two lands. He built his Karnak to glorify his conquests, but that’s not what the other symbols mean. Whoever was in charge of props, wasn’t versed in Egyptian mythology, but none the less, they have a meaning that I have seen since I was very small. We need to imposed the UN to exemplify justice, not to cower behind closed doors and promulgate the will of the few. All these ethical issues will keep rearing their ugly heads, and we need to engage in the debate. We need to empower the individual to work for the good of the whole, not themselves.
by marek pyka
” we will have to understand why we do them in the first place..
No, just how. Why is anthropomorphic projection, a source of error.
“That is the central idea of democracy.” You’re joking, right? Or are you projecting again? That is a very lazy scientist, to bypass the scientific method that actually produces advances.
by marek pyka
” We need to imposed the UN to exemplify justice, not to cower behind closed doors and promulgate the will of the few.”
Now THAT’s the purpose and function of democracy: to promulgate the will of the few…it is just an alternative method to other political systems, but it has the exact same large outcome as any other system: an alternative to outright murder and lawlessness, period. Just a variation of form, not of function, to any other conquest based enterprise, which is: dominance of the many by the few, and in as many ways as possible.
If by programming we can replace animal instinct (reptile brain) influences that subtly weave us right back into excesses, then THAT’s the reason for advances…and learning the HOW, not the WHY. Thus we can re-wire ourselves to avoid irrational destructive excesses, by bypassing the reptilian and animal “in-humane” excesses when we don’t need more food or shelter or knowledge or power in our immediate persons. The UN is just another iteration of the same old power and brutality of our reptilian impulses dominating to excess.
by JC
One implication of the work is that it may be useless to give therapy or drugs to help with motivation in a ‘relaxing home environment’. Perhaps we should only bother applying therapy when an engaging challenge is directly in front of the person.
by marek pyka
Why not just use drugs or other forms of “soma” available today?
by A4i
Healthy people may feel themselves depressed, so that condition is not irreversible. Sometimes even the best effort is meaningless. It all depends on how depressant or stimulating is the environment. The appetite comes in eating. Nothing to eat – no appetite.
by marek pyka
The brain IS one’s environment, successful signalling produces emotion and motivation. If the wires are lit properly, then mood and attention are fine…if wires elsewhere are too active someplace else, then they produce anxiety or autism.
by Sherrie
Great work. Can the pathways be stimulated by other means, non0nvasive and external to reduce suffering in humans, if not now, eventually? Could this type of approach be used with addictions?
by Jerry
rTMS and tDCS seems to show some benefits, a quick google showed http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0022812 which concluded there was some reduction in negative stimuli during tDCS.
Having clinical depression since early teens I’ve been keeping an eye on the study of tDCS, rTMS and neurofeedback and all three are really showing promise with lasting effects / neuroplasticity. Not sure on addictions though.
by marek pyka
Repitition over long consistent periods are necessary to migrate or stimulate growth in receptors.