Researchers turn one form of neuron into another in the brain
January 22, 2013

Diagram of a typical motor neuron (credit: Wikimedia Commons)
A new finding by Harvard stem cell biologists turns one of the basics of neurobiology on its head — demonstrating that it is possible to turn one type of already differentiated (formed from a stem cell) neuron into another within the brain.
The discovery by Paola Arlotta and Caroline Rouaux indicates that “maybe the brain is not as immutable as we always thought, because at least during an early window of time, one can reprogram the identity of one neuronal class into another,” said Arlotta, an Associate Professor in Harvard’s Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology (SCRB).
The principle of direct lineage reprogramming of differentiated cells within the body was first proven by SCRB co-chair and Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) co-director Doug Melton and colleagues five years ago, when they reprogrammed exocrine pancreatic cells directly into insulin producing beta cells.
Arlotta and Rouaux now have proven that neurons too can change their mind.
In their experiments, Arlotta targeted callosal projection neurons, which connect the two hemispheres of the brain, and turned them into neurons similar to corticospinal motor neurons, one of two populations of neurons destroyed in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease.
To achieve such reprogramming of neuronal identity, the researchers used a transcription factor called Fezf2, which long as been known for playing a central role in the development of corticospinal neurons in the embryo.
Implications for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
What makes the finding even more significant is that the work was done in the brains of living mice, rather than in collections of cells in laboratory dishes. The mice were young, so researchers still do not know if neuronal reprogramming will be possible in older laboratory animals — and humans. If it is possible, this has enormous implications for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.
“Neurodegenerative diseases typically effect a specific population of neurons, leaving many others untouched. For example, in ALS it is corticospinal motor neurons in the brain and motor neurons in the spinal cord, among the many neurons of the nervous system, that selectively die,” Arlotta said.
“What if one could take neurons that are spared in a given disease and turn them directly into the neurons that die off? In ALS, if you could generate even a small percentage of corticospinal motor neurons, it would likely be sufficient to recover basic functioning,” she said.
The work in Arlotta’s lab is focused on the cerebral cortex, but “it opens the door to reprogramming in other areas of the central nervous system,” she said.
Arlotta, an HSCI principal faculty member, is now working with colleague Takao Hensch, of Harvard’s Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, to explicate the physiology of the reprogrammed neurons, and learn how they communicate within pre-existing neuronal networks.
“My hope is that this will facilitate work in a new field of neurobiology that explores the boundaries and power of neuronal reprogramming to re-engineer circuits relevant to disease,” said Arlotta.
This work was financed by a seed grant from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, and by support from the National Institutes of Health, and the Spastic Parapelgia Foundation.
Comments (5)
by Singularity Utopia
Have Paola Arlotta and Caroline Rouaux (Harvard) really made this “discovery?” I am not sure thus I would appreciate clarification. I ask because recently I posted about some very similar news to my G+ Page. On 15th Jan I posted this: http://goo.gl/yi6ID regarding “In vivo reprogramming of circuit connectivity in postmitotic neocortical neurons,” (Université de Genève) which was submitted to Nature on 1th Sept 2012, whereas “Direct lineage reprogramming of post-mitotic callosal neurons into corticofugal neurons in vivo” (Harvard) was submitted to Nature on 19th October 2012, here are the links: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nn.3299.html and http://www.nature.com/ncb/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ncb2660.html
Both articles in Nature mention the Fezf2 transcription factor and both articles are regarding neurons changing their identity. Fezf2 does seem interesting, Paola Arlotta and Caroline Rouaux also published “Fezf2 directs the differentiation of corticofugal neurons from striatal progenitors in vivo” in July 2010: http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v13/n11/abs/nn.2658.html
Both the recent articles in Nature fail to mention the authors for the other article thus I think we are looking at separate and slightly different research regarding the same issue, or maybe I am merely being sleepy thus I’ve missed an obvious connection?
Here is some more info about Fezf2: http://www.pnas.org/content/105/32/11382.figures-only
by Whittaker
What are you going to do then, sue them?
BTW, why don’t you just publish your “discovery” on KurzweilAI, being a freqent visitor?
Or ask KAI staff to help you?
by Whittaker
I expected immediate reply. One full day has passed.
I wonder whether I can make similar discovery and win some kind of funds or prize.
by Logic
This is a remarkable discovery with massive implications. Please post follow-ups as they appear.
by JC
Great discovery for curing diseases! Also tempting for rich totalitarian governments to improve their young math students, to make them more mathier.