Rice unveils super-efficient solar-energy technology
November 21, 2012
The solar steam device developed at Rice University has an overall energy efficiency of 24 percent, far surpassing that of photovoltaic solar panels. It may first be used in sanitation and water-purification applications in the developing world. (Credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)
Rice University scientists have unveiled a revolutionary new technology that uses silicon dioxide/gold nanoshells and N115 carbon nanoparticles to convert solar energy directly into steam. The new “solar steam” method from Rice’s Laboratory for Nanophotonics (LANP) is so effective it can even produce steam from icy cold water.
The technology has an overall energy efficiency of 24 percent. Photovoltaic solar panels, by comparison, typically have an overall energy efficiency around 15 percent. However, the inventors of solar steam said they expect the first uses of the new technology will not be for electricity generation but rather for sanitation and water purification in developing countries.
“This is about a lot more than electricity,” said LANP Director Naomi Halas, the lead scientist on the project. “With this technology, we are beginning to think about solar thermal power in a completely different way.”
New solar steam technology developed at Rice University uses nanoparticles so effective at turning sunlight into heat that it can produce steam from icy-cold water (credit: Jeff Fitlow/Rice University)
The efficiency of solar steam is due to the light-capturing nanoparticles that convert sunlight into heat. When submerged in water and exposed to sunlight, the particles heat up so quickly they instantly vaporize water and create steam.
Halas said the solar steam’s overall energy efficiency can probably be increased as the technology is refined.
“We’re going from heating water on the macro scale to heating it at the nanoscale,” Halas said. “Our particles are very small — even smaller than a wavelength of light — which means they have an extremely small surface area to dissipate heat.
This intense heating allows us to generate steam locally, right at the surface of the particle.”
Steam is one of the world’s most-used industrial fluids. About 90 percent of electricity is produced from steam, and steam is also used to sterilize medical waste and surgical instruments, to prepare food and to purify water.
Most industrial steam is produced in large boilers, and Halas said solar steam’s efficiency could allow steam to become economical on a much smaller scale.
People in developing countries will be among the first to see the benefits of solar steam. Rice engineering undergraduates have already created a solar steam-powered autoclave that’s capable of sterilizing medical and dental instruments at clinics that lack electricity. Halas also won a Grand Challenges grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to create an ultra-small-scale system for treating human waste in areas without sewer systems or electricity.
“Solar steam is remarkable because of its efficiency,” said Neumann, the lead co-author on the paper. “It does not require acres of mirrors or solar panels. In fact, the footprint can be very small. For example, the light window in our demonstration autoclave was just a few square centimeters.”
Another potential use could be in powering hybrid air-conditioning and heating systems that run off of sunlight during the day and electricity at night. Halas, Neumann and colleagues have also conducted distillation experiments and found that solar steam is about two-and-a-half times more efficient than existing distillation columns.
Halas, the Rice Stanley C. Moore Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, professor of physics, professor of chemistry and professor of biomedical engineering, is one of the world’s most-cited chemists. Her lab specializes in creating and studying light-activated particles. One of her creations, gold nanoshells, is the subject of several clinical trials for cancer treatment.
For the cancer treatment technology and many other applications, Halas’ team chooses particles that interact with just a few wavelengths of light. For the solar steam project, Halas and Neumann set out to design a particle that would interact with the widest possible spectrum of sunlight energy. Their new nanoparticles are activated by both visible sunlight and shorter wavelengths that humans cannot see.
“We’re not changing any of the laws of thermodynamics,” Halas said. “We’re just boiling water in a radically different way.”
The research was supported by the Welch Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Comments (28)
by Vin
ah, my completely off-grid living fantasy seems to be closer. But wow, how you become a professor of so many abstruse disciplines in just one lifetime is completely beyond my ken!
by Eric
Cool but would not look as nice as solar panels on a roof.
by Gorden Russell
It would be cooler than solar cells, a real status symbol. All the neighbors will want one.
by AZryan
I hope you’re joking? Many home community bylaws prohibit satellite dishes on people’s roofs because enough people hate them to try to ban them. Thankfully, that’s illegal so people can have them up there anyway (under 3′ dia I think?)
Just saying there’s actual evidence that many people would HATE these things on roofs. It would need a large redesign for homes IMO.
The one in the vid looks so large it would need to go on the ground -not that a lab design means much. Maybe they could make a long half-tube type model instead of a round dish. That might work along the edge of a roof.
by gaoptimize
Fresnel lenses for the dishaphobes.
by asiwel
How long will the nanoparticles last? Do they degrade or wear out or get lost?It looks sort of like gravity is holding them near the bottom of the tube in the fluid at the light focal point. What happens to the waste particles, etc., in the water when used for desalination or waste treatment? How are these collected/disposed of? When they say “…[the] new nanoparticles are activated by both visible sunlight and shorter wavelengths that humans cannot see…”, does that meanwhile ultraviolet light energy? Or did they mean “longer” wavelengths and infrared energy>
by Nick Radonic
And if you boil off water, you leave behind salts and calcium deposits. That would tend to gunk up the nanocrystals, rendering them unusable. I can forsee a lot of flushing steps that waste energy.
Maybe we need a water purification step first.
by Rob Fleming
Seems like the applications mentioned are a very small subset of the possibilities. Making booze (“sunshine”, not “moonshine”) comes to mind……..
What other distributed/off the grid process heat requirements might this meet?
by Gorden Russell
That’s a great idea, Rob Fleming, except that the revenours or revanewers, (however you spell it) are up there with drones, looking for stills. That mirror will be a dead giveaway.
by gaoptimize
They are going to have a tough time working around the Leidenfrost effect. Maybe operating at an increased pressure would minimize the insulating gas boundary layer?
by Mr.X
One could think this article is about biotechnology.
by Marcos Marin
I would not call that “thinking”.
by Mr.X
@Marcos: Who cares about you?It is not as if you’re smart^^
by Mr.X
Seriously.If you don’t call it thinking it must be almost perfect.
by Marcos Marin
This makes even less sense.
by Mr.X
“This makes even less sense.”
Only to someone who “thinks” like you.
by Marcos Marin
in the original sense of “thinking”? or the one you used?
by Mr.X
Which is the original sense of thinking, and which is the sense I used?
Maybe you can clarify what YOU “think”, so that I can answer properly.
Ps: Well: “Thought generally refers to any mental or intellectual activity involving an individual’s subjective consciousness.”
Wiki.
This is the kind of thinking I meant.Which also means my first comment described something that could be the end-result of a thinking process.
So, what’s your “original” sense of thinking?I guess the colloquial meaning of “being right (if not, you didn’t think enough/right) or having “common sense”"; or whatever.Which would explain your dumb comment about my first comment.
by Mr.X
Answer’s pending ;)
by Marcos Marin
Just as much as they care about you;-)
by Mr.X
“Just as much as they care about you;-)”
You see.Your opinion doesn’t matter.
by Marcos Marin
Exactly. To most at least. Which is a good thing.
But wait, does this also means the opinion my opinion doesn’t matter doesn’t matter?
by Mr.X
Depends on your purpose/intent.
But in general, it doesn’t matter.Do you feel smart because of this question?
It is the kind of thing kids sometimes do to feel smart: Seeing if a claim includes itself in a seemingly contradicting way.
“There is no absolute truth”- really?
by Marcos Marin
I agree. Gödel was such a prick! I hate him.
I see no contradiction there though.
what? uh? who said that?
by Bri
In the video, the speaker say’s that the efficiency is 80 to 90%. in the article it say’s that it’s overall efficiency is 24%.what’s causing the loss?
by asiwel
In the video she said 80%-90% of the thermal energy actually absorbed by the nanoparticles – I guess that is different from the total amount of energy available in the incident light from the sun.
by Jerry
I believe it’s 80-90% of the energy from the 24% of solar energy gathered is used to turn water into steam.
by AZryan
That doesn’t make sense to me. I think she said it collected 80-90% of the light that hits it. She didn’t say that 24% of the light is gathered and then 90% of that is turned into steam energy. Did she even say 24% anything at all in that video? I didn’t think so.