Study offers new clue on how brain processes visual information
July 24, 2012

Schematic diagram of the monkey brain and areas in which recordings were performed. AS, arcuate sulcus; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; PS, principal sulcus; STS, superior temporal sulcus. (Credit: F. Katsuki et al./Nature Neuroscience)
Researchers at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center have discovered an important clue to how the human brain — which is constantly bombarded with millions of pieces of visual information, can filter out what’s unimportant and focus on what’s most useful.
Evidence from an animal study shows that the prefrontal cortex is involved in a previously unknown way.
“Our findings suggest that both the ability to focus attention intentionally and shifting attention to eye-catching but sometimes unimportant stimuli depend on the prefrontal cortex,” said Christos Constantinidis, Ph.D., associate professor of neurobiology and anatomy at Wake Forest Baptist and senior author of the study.
“Our findings provide insights on the neural mechanisms behind the guidance of attention.”
Two types of attention are utilized in the selective attention process:
- Bottom-up attention is automatically guided to images that stand out from a background by virtue of color, shape or motion, such as a billboard on a highway.
- Top-down attention occurs when one’s focus is consciously shifted to look for a known target in a visual scene, as when searching for a relative in a crowd.
Traditionally, scientists have believed that separate areas of the brain controlled these two processes, with bottom-up attention occurring in the posterior parietal cortex and top-down attention occurring in the prefrontal cortex.
“This has implications for conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which affects millions of people worldwide. People with ADHD have difficulty filtering information and focusing attention.”
In the Wake Forest Baptist study, two monkeys were trained to detect images on a computer screen while activity in both areas of the brain was recorded. The visual display was designed to let one image “pop out” due to its color difference from the background, such as a red circle surrounded by green. To trigger bottom-up attention, neither the identity nor the location of the pop-out image could be predicted before it appeared. The monkeys indicated that they detected the pop-out image by pushing a lever.
The neural activity associated with identifying the pop-out images occurred in the prefrontal cortex at the same time as in the posterior parietal cortex. This unexpected finding indicates early involvement of the prefrontal cortex in bottom-up attention, in addition to its known role in top-down attention, and provides new insights into the neural mechanisms of attention.
“We hope that our findings will guide future work targeting attention deficits,” Constantinidis said.
The research was supported by the National Eye Institute contract ROI EY016773 and the Tab Williams Family Endowment.
Comments (5)
by GatorALLin
All animals have basic pattern recognition built in as a core learning tool. Our puppy would run in the field and any flower or tall plant that would stand out would get his attention. I noticed he would pee on them… then realized that other older dogs would do the same thing… he quickly realized anything sticking out in the field were calling cards or scent spots to check out… and the filed was huge… When we walk him in the neighborhood he notices anything out of place… a garbage can out by the house or any single thing out of place on a 2 mile walk you see him notice. My gut says every animal builds a very fast library of visual images and learns to scan and use pattern recognition very quickly.
by Doc C
A delusion implies a perception unlinked to a reality. A “me” that is capable of changing its environment based on its underlying operational processes is not a delusion. So, for exale, if I say I want my body waste to be processed away from where I eat and sleep, and build plumbing, where is the delusion?
by Jon
With the information available today, I’d say ‘you’ as an emergent property of the functioning of the brain is most likely. That doesn’t make our ‘self’ more or less ‘real’ than if it were separate from the organic brain, since we experience it the way we do.
We experience a sense of self, of conciousness, regardless of it’s nature. The continuity of that conciousness is probably the illusion, but again that is irrelevant – as long as we can maintain that illusion. Same goes for free will.
I’d love to explore the reality behind it one day, though. Fiddle with my mind’s settings and architecture, using nanotechnology most likely. And if the brain is deterministic, and run by its underlying processes, than merely making it more complex (and massive) would make us more aware, and more human.
by Bri
Really makes you wonder where the “you” is, in all those circuits.
by Editor
… or if “you” is a delusion….