The search for ET continues — in West Virginia
May 15, 2011 by Amara D. Angelica

Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope (GBT), the world's largest fully steerable single-aperture antenna (credit: NRAO)
Now that NASA’s Kepler space telescope has identified 1,235 possible planets around stars in our galaxy, astronomers at the University of California, Berkeley, are aiming a radio telescope — the 100 meter Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope, the largest steerable radio telescope in the world — at the most Earth-like of these worlds to see if they can detect signals from an advanced civilization.
“The SETI Institute is also checking out the most attractive of the new worlds discovered by Kepler, in hopes of discovering that some might shelter — not just life — but technically sophisticated life,” SETI Institute senior astronomer Seth Shostak told KurzweilAI. :”We do this over a very wide range of radio frequencies, and with the ability to immediately check out any interesting signals. The real excitement, of course, is that SETI practitioners now have some very compelling directions in which to aim their antennas. Really, it’s like trying to discover Antarctica two centuries ago: the chances improve when everyone aims their ships toward the south!”
The search began on a week ago on May 8, when astronomers dedicated an hour to eight stars with candidate planets in the star’s habitable zone (ones with a surface temperature between zero and 100 degrees Celsius, so liquid water could be maintained and they are likely to harbor life).
They plan to acquire 24 hours of data on a total of 86 Earth-like planets, do a coarse analysis, and then, in about two months, ask an estimated 1 million users of SETI@home (the world’s largest distributed computer) to conduct a more detailed analysis on their home computers.
Targeting habitable planets
The Kepler Mission uses a satellite to watch for the small dip in light received from a star when an orbiting planet passes between our line of sight with the star.
So far, around 1300 planet candidates have been found by the Kepler Satellite.
The 86 stars were chosen from the 1,235 candidate planetary systems, called Kepler Objects of Interest, or KOIs. The targets include the 54 KOIs identified by the Kepler team as being in the habitable temperature range and with sizes ranging from Earth-size to larger than Jupiter.
There are also 10 KOIs not on the Kepler team’s habitable list but with orbits less than three times Earth’s orbit and orbital periods greater than 50 days, and systems with four or more possible planets.
After the Green Bank telescope has targeted each star, it will scan the entire Kepler field for signals from planets other than the 86 targets. “If you extrapolate from the Kepler data, there could be 50 billion planets in the galaxy,” physicist Dan Werthimer, chief scientist for SETI@home, said. “It’s really exciting to be able to look at this first batch of Earth-like planets.”
Why the Green Bank Telescope?
Werthimer conducted a brief SETI project using the Allen Telescope Array (ATA), which hosted a broader search for intelligent signals from space run by the SETI Institute. That search ended last month after the institute and UC Berkeley ran out of money to operate it. Now the action has moved to West Virginia.
So why not use Arecibo? Because the Arecibo dish can’t view the area of the northern sky on which Kepler focuses. Arecibo also has limited frequency coverage (it centers on the 21 centimeter or 1420 MHz “water hole,” a natural window in which water-based life forms would signal their existence, since its wavelengths easily pass through the dust clouds that obscure much of the galaxy).
“With a new data recorder on the Green Bank telescope, we can scan a 800 megaHertz range of frequencies simultaneously, which is 300 times the range we can get at Arecibo,” said Werthimer. One day on the Green Bank telescope provides as much data as one year’s worth of observations at Arecibo: about 60 terabytes.
For more information:
Related Site Content:
No related posts.



Comments (8)
by SparkyFire
time variation /mass/distance
by SparkyFire
freq changes w/resistance
by SparkyFire
every star has its own freq changes in freq modulation of planetary body will confirm
by ks1u
I would like to see this search based upon a “radio signature” of the planet. This would take at least one orbit of the planet around the star and rather than look for a narrow band signal, a wide spectrum view would enable us to see the impact of an ionosphere on signals from the planet in question. I mentioned this to Dr. Shostak, and while he was polite though not enthusiastic, I still feel it has a higher probability of succeeding than searching for a +/- 1.4 gHz signal aimed at us. Surely any planet with technologically advanced life must have some type of ionosphere which varies from day to night and throughout the course of the stellar cycle.
by Amara D. Angelica
KS1U: Interesting idea. I assume you mean by measuring differential day/night absorption or reflection of planetary (and ionospheric) RF in the HF region (or higher — think tropospheric ducting?) due to ionization layers (implying an atmosphere)? Supporting that, http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/jaa/9/225-229.pdf reports solar RF flux measured down to 19 MHz. I’ve been talking to an amateur-radio researcher doing moon bounce at Arecibo — we just need to add an HF yagi and task Arecibo to monitor these targets. Or add a yagi on the GBT? Or should we send CQ?
Problem is how to deal with HF attenuation from our own ionosphere (without going into space) — Amara (KF6TEJ)
by ks1u
Amara, thanks for the comments. Yes, you are correct. In addition, there should be a solar cycle, which for an exoplanet may not be 11 years like here. The problem with antennas at these frequencies may be helped by fractal antennas. Unfortunately, until I retire and can implement some of these ideas, I can only share them for now. I thought about this in the early 80s and within the last few years have begun to discuss them more freely. There are certainly many glitches which would be encountered, but any method will likely have those. I also think it might be interesting to look for diversity transmitters within that wide band. Much like we get here for WWV. The military uses diversity reception with multiple receivers on different frequencies listening to the same transmission data. When one frequency fades the others may not. Of course finding the same signal on two or more frequencies simultaneously from an exoplanet would make for a very interesting occurrence.
by Amara D. Angelica
Agreed re fractal antennas. Paul Shuch (N6TX) of SETI League has designed some excellent ones. And right, freq. diversity might help penetrate the high noise level at non-waterhole frequencies. I’ve proposed ultra wideband as a logical ET strategy — if we knew the timing code (use Pi digits?). One idea that just occurred to me: create an autonomous bot that automatically learns to improve its data communication in noise, and use the timing codes it derives as search templates? Could do via SETI@home using fuzzy set-similarity joins (http://www.ics.uci.edu/~rares/pub/sigmod10-p495-vernica-long.pdf) via Hadoop (currently discussed on the AGI list re OpenCog)?
by Editor
Comment by SETI Institute’s Seth Shostak added.